地球前变率的演变和晚新生代的快速下降

IF 4.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
David Waltham , Mattias Green
{"title":"地球前变率的演变和晚新生代的快速下降","authors":"David Waltham ,&nbsp;Mattias Green","doi":"10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We consider the use of cyclostratigraphic estimates of ancient Earth-axis precession rates, <em>k</em>, as a proxy for ancient length of day and ancient Earth-Moon distance. Analysis of published estimates for <em>k</em> indicate a statistically robust acceleration in the rate at which <em>k</em> fell during the Late Proterozoic. We investigate whether this accelerated fall-rate can be reasonably explained by an increase in tidal drag, at that time, or whether alternate explanations are needed. A tidal drag explanation requires an unusually large and long-lived resonance in Earth's oceans. However, alternate explanations are even less viable. A rearrangement of Earth's internal structure can be ruled out by the excessive geothermal heat production this would have caused, whilst mass redistribution due to Late Proterozoic glaciation can also be ruled out as the <em>k</em>-history did not return to its former trend after glaciation ended. Disruption of the Earth-Moon-Sun system by a nearby passing star is similarly unable to account for the observations since the required disruption is much too large to have happened without additional, clearly observable effects. We also consider a possible impact from thermally driven, atmospheric tides but reject this explanation as it would decelerate the fall in precession rather than accelerate it. These conclusions required development of novel techniques for inverse modelling the <em>k</em>-history to directly give (i) tidal-drag and (ii) the potential energy liberated by internal mass distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11481,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","volume":"648 ","pages":"Article 119086"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earth's precession rate evolution and rapid fall during the Late Proterozoic\",\"authors\":\"David Waltham ,&nbsp;Mattias Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We consider the use of cyclostratigraphic estimates of ancient Earth-axis precession rates, <em>k</em>, as a proxy for ancient length of day and ancient Earth-Moon distance. Analysis of published estimates for <em>k</em> indicate a statistically robust acceleration in the rate at which <em>k</em> fell during the Late Proterozoic. We investigate whether this accelerated fall-rate can be reasonably explained by an increase in tidal drag, at that time, or whether alternate explanations are needed. A tidal drag explanation requires an unusually large and long-lived resonance in Earth's oceans. However, alternate explanations are even less viable. A rearrangement of Earth's internal structure can be ruled out by the excessive geothermal heat production this would have caused, whilst mass redistribution due to Late Proterozoic glaciation can also be ruled out as the <em>k</em>-history did not return to its former trend after glaciation ended. Disruption of the Earth-Moon-Sun system by a nearby passing star is similarly unable to account for the observations since the required disruption is much too large to have happened without additional, clearly observable effects. We also consider a possible impact from thermally driven, atmospheric tides but reject this explanation as it would decelerate the fall in precession rather than accelerate it. These conclusions required development of novel techniques for inverse modelling the <em>k</em>-history to directly give (i) tidal-drag and (ii) the potential energy liberated by internal mass distribution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth and Planetary Science Letters\",\"volume\":\"648 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth and Planetary Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24005181\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24005181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑使用古地轴前向率(k)的循环地层学估算值来替代古昼长和古地月距离。对已发表的 k 估算值的分析表明,在晚新生代,k 的下降速率在统计学上出现了强劲的加速。我们研究了是否可以用当时潮汐阻力的增加来合理解释这种加速下降的速率,或者是否需要其他解释。潮汐阻力的解释需要地球海洋中存在异常巨大和持久的共振。然而,其他解释就更不可行了。地球内部结构的重新排列可以排除,因为这会导致过多的地热产生,而由于晚新生代冰川作用导致的质量重新分布也可以排除,因为冰川作用结束后,k-历史并没有恢复到以前的趋势。附近一颗流逝的恒星对地-月-日系统的扰动同样无法解释观测结果,因为所需的扰动太大,如果没有额外的、明显可观测到的影响,是不可能发生的。我们还考虑了由热驱动的大气潮汐可能造成的影响,但拒绝接受这种解释,因为它将减慢而不是加速前向下落。要得出这些结论,就需要发展新的技术,对 k 历史进行反建模,以直接给出 (i) 潮汐阻力和 (ii) 内部质量分布释放的势能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Earth's precession rate evolution and rapid fall during the Late Proterozoic
We consider the use of cyclostratigraphic estimates of ancient Earth-axis precession rates, k, as a proxy for ancient length of day and ancient Earth-Moon distance. Analysis of published estimates for k indicate a statistically robust acceleration in the rate at which k fell during the Late Proterozoic. We investigate whether this accelerated fall-rate can be reasonably explained by an increase in tidal drag, at that time, or whether alternate explanations are needed. A tidal drag explanation requires an unusually large and long-lived resonance in Earth's oceans. However, alternate explanations are even less viable. A rearrangement of Earth's internal structure can be ruled out by the excessive geothermal heat production this would have caused, whilst mass redistribution due to Late Proterozoic glaciation can also be ruled out as the k-history did not return to its former trend after glaciation ended. Disruption of the Earth-Moon-Sun system by a nearby passing star is similarly unable to account for the observations since the required disruption is much too large to have happened without additional, clearly observable effects. We also consider a possible impact from thermally driven, atmospheric tides but reject this explanation as it would decelerate the fall in precession rather than accelerate it. These conclusions required development of novel techniques for inverse modelling the k-history to directly give (i) tidal-drag and (ii) the potential energy liberated by internal mass distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
475
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) is a leading journal for researchers across the entire Earth and planetary sciences community. It publishes concise, exciting, high-impact articles ("Letters") of broad interest. Its focus is on physical and chemical processes, the evolution and general properties of the Earth and planets - from their deep interiors to their atmospheres. EPSL also includes a Frontiers section, featuring invited high-profile synthesis articles by leading experts on timely topics to bring cutting-edge research to the wider community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信