{"title":"GRAIN 研究--粒细胞抗感染--造血干细胞移植中粒细胞输注的应用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Granulocyte transfusions (GTx) combat infections in neutropenic patients. However, immune-mediated off-target effects in transplant settings are unknown. Between January 2020 and December 2021, all transplants that used GTx during the peri-transplant period were analysed. Engraftment, infections, and days to clearance were retrieved from clinical records. Overall survival is compared with the mean total PMN count and the different products. Pooled buffy coat was used in 110 patients (98 %), of which 38 (34 %) additionally received an apheresed product. The median days of GTx was 4. The median bags pooled to prepare a single buffy coat product was 4. The mean total PMN count was 0.98 × 10<sup>10</sup>/ L granulocytes per pooled buffy coat and 1.93 × 10<sup>10</sup>/L granulocytes per apheresis product. A higher PMN count (>1 × 10<sup>10</sup>/L) was achieved in 48 % with pooled buffy coat versus 85 % with apheresis. Respiratory worsening occurred in 39 % receiving GTx. All patients who received granulocytes had engrafted with a median time of 14 days for neutrophil and 20 days for platelet engraftment. Blood cultures cleared in 81 %, whereas only 28 % cleared other cultures. Fungal pneumonia cleared in 25 %, and invasive fungal sinusitis or otitis cleared in 50 %. Overall survival was 47 %, non-significantly higher (57 % vs 39 %, P = 0.1) with a higher PMN dose. The pooled buffy coat is an affordable alternative to apheresis for an effective PMN dose. Ease of availability and low cost of pooled buffy coat, with comparable overall survival points toward a safe and efficacious product, in the peri-transplant period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GRAIN Study - Granulocytes Against Infections - Use of granulocyte transfusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Granulocyte transfusions (GTx) combat infections in neutropenic patients. However, immune-mediated off-target effects in transplant settings are unknown. Between January 2020 and December 2021, all transplants that used GTx during the peri-transplant period were analysed. Engraftment, infections, and days to clearance were retrieved from clinical records. Overall survival is compared with the mean total PMN count and the different products. Pooled buffy coat was used in 110 patients (98 %), of which 38 (34 %) additionally received an apheresed product. The median days of GTx was 4. The median bags pooled to prepare a single buffy coat product was 4. The mean total PMN count was 0.98 × 10<sup>10</sup>/ L granulocytes per pooled buffy coat and 1.93 × 10<sup>10</sup>/L granulocytes per apheresis product. A higher PMN count (>1 × 10<sup>10</sup>/L) was achieved in 48 % with pooled buffy coat versus 85 % with apheresis. Respiratory worsening occurred in 39 % receiving GTx. All patients who received granulocytes had engrafted with a median time of 14 days for neutrophil and 20 days for platelet engraftment. Blood cultures cleared in 81 %, whereas only 28 % cleared other cultures. Fungal pneumonia cleared in 25 %, and invasive fungal sinusitis or otitis cleared in 50 %. Overall survival was 47 %, non-significantly higher (57 % vs 39 %, P = 0.1) with a higher PMN dose. The pooled buffy coat is an affordable alternative to apheresis for an effective PMN dose. Ease of availability and low cost of pooled buffy coat, with comparable overall survival points toward a safe and efficacious product, in the peri-transplant period.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion and Apheresis Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion and Apheresis Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224002015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224002015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
GRAIN Study - Granulocytes Against Infections - Use of granulocyte transfusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant
Granulocyte transfusions (GTx) combat infections in neutropenic patients. However, immune-mediated off-target effects in transplant settings are unknown. Between January 2020 and December 2021, all transplants that used GTx during the peri-transplant period were analysed. Engraftment, infections, and days to clearance were retrieved from clinical records. Overall survival is compared with the mean total PMN count and the different products. Pooled buffy coat was used in 110 patients (98 %), of which 38 (34 %) additionally received an apheresed product. The median days of GTx was 4. The median bags pooled to prepare a single buffy coat product was 4. The mean total PMN count was 0.98 × 1010/ L granulocytes per pooled buffy coat and 1.93 × 1010/L granulocytes per apheresis product. A higher PMN count (>1 × 1010/L) was achieved in 48 % with pooled buffy coat versus 85 % with apheresis. Respiratory worsening occurred in 39 % receiving GTx. All patients who received granulocytes had engrafted with a median time of 14 days for neutrophil and 20 days for platelet engraftment. Blood cultures cleared in 81 %, whereas only 28 % cleared other cultures. Fungal pneumonia cleared in 25 %, and invasive fungal sinusitis or otitis cleared in 50 %. Overall survival was 47 %, non-significantly higher (57 % vs 39 %, P = 0.1) with a higher PMN dose. The pooled buffy coat is an affordable alternative to apheresis for an effective PMN dose. Ease of availability and low cost of pooled buffy coat, with comparable overall survival points toward a safe and efficacious product, in the peri-transplant period.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.