利用扩展松冈-中井屈服准则计算浅层隧道排水三维稳定性的下限和上限

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
A.N. Antão , M. Vicente da Silva
{"title":"利用扩展松冈-中井屈服准则计算浅层隧道排水三维稳定性的下限和上限","authors":"A.N. Antão ,&nbsp;M. Vicente da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper focuses on determining lower and upper approximations of the pressure required on the unlined part of a tunnel’s front under drained conditions. This work is carried out within the framework of classic limit analysis. In the last three decades, various approaches have been explored to enhance the understanding of the minimum pressure required for ensuring the stability of the massif during tunnel excavation under drained conditions. Methods for solving this problem are typically categorized as limit equilibrium methods, limit analysis methods, or elasto-plastic stress–strain calculations. However, the failure criterion used has almost invariably been the Mohr–Coulomb criterion. Despite its broad application, this criterion has certain limitations in evaluating the effect of the three principal stresses on the yield of earthy or rocky materials. Over time, alternative failure criteria have been proposed to address this issue, including one developed by Matsuoka and Nakai.</div><div>This work applies Limit Analysis theorems to this problem using an extended Matsuoka-Nakai criterion. Besides providing highly accurate stability factors for tunnels using this criterion, the novelty of this study also lies in the comparative analysis of numerical results with experimental data, demonstrating that the Matsuoka-Nakai criterion offers a more accurate model of the experimental data compared to the traditional Mohr–Coulomb approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 106137"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower and upper bounds for the drained three-dimensional stability of shallow tunnels using the Extended Matsuoka-Nakai yield criterion\",\"authors\":\"A.N. Antão ,&nbsp;M. Vicente da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The paper focuses on determining lower and upper approximations of the pressure required on the unlined part of a tunnel’s front under drained conditions. This work is carried out within the framework of classic limit analysis. In the last three decades, various approaches have been explored to enhance the understanding of the minimum pressure required for ensuring the stability of the massif during tunnel excavation under drained conditions. Methods for solving this problem are typically categorized as limit equilibrium methods, limit analysis methods, or elasto-plastic stress–strain calculations. However, the failure criterion used has almost invariably been the Mohr–Coulomb criterion. Despite its broad application, this criterion has certain limitations in evaluating the effect of the three principal stresses on the yield of earthy or rocky materials. Over time, alternative failure criteria have been proposed to address this issue, including one developed by Matsuoka and Nakai.</div><div>This work applies Limit Analysis theorems to this problem using an extended Matsuoka-Nakai criterion. Besides providing highly accurate stability factors for tunnels using this criterion, the novelty of this study also lies in the comparative analysis of numerical results with experimental data, demonstrating that the Matsuoka-Nakai criterion offers a more accurate model of the experimental data compared to the traditional Mohr–Coulomb approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824005558\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824005558","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是确定在排水条件下隧道前沿无衬砌部分所需的压力的下限和上限近似值。这项工作是在经典极限分析框架内进行的。在过去的三十年中,人们探索了各种方法,以加深对在排水条件下隧道开挖过程中确保地表稳定所需的最小压力的理解。解决这一问题的方法通常分为极限平衡法、极限分析法或弹塑性应力应变计算法。不过,所使用的破坏标准几乎都是莫尔-库仑标准。尽管该准则应用广泛,但在评估三个主要应力对土质或岩质材料屈服的影响时有一定的局限性。随着时间的推移,人们提出了其他失效准则来解决这一问题,其中包括松冈和中井开发的准则。除了使用该准则为隧道提供高度精确的稳定系数外,本研究的新颖之处还在于将数值结果与实验数据进行了对比分析,证明松冈-中井准则与传统的莫尔-库仑方法相比,提供了更精确的实验数据模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower and upper bounds for the drained three-dimensional stability of shallow tunnels using the Extended Matsuoka-Nakai yield criterion
The paper focuses on determining lower and upper approximations of the pressure required on the unlined part of a tunnel’s front under drained conditions. This work is carried out within the framework of classic limit analysis. In the last three decades, various approaches have been explored to enhance the understanding of the minimum pressure required for ensuring the stability of the massif during tunnel excavation under drained conditions. Methods for solving this problem are typically categorized as limit equilibrium methods, limit analysis methods, or elasto-plastic stress–strain calculations. However, the failure criterion used has almost invariably been the Mohr–Coulomb criterion. Despite its broad application, this criterion has certain limitations in evaluating the effect of the three principal stresses on the yield of earthy or rocky materials. Over time, alternative failure criteria have been proposed to address this issue, including one developed by Matsuoka and Nakai.
This work applies Limit Analysis theorems to this problem using an extended Matsuoka-Nakai criterion. Besides providing highly accurate stability factors for tunnels using this criterion, the novelty of this study also lies in the comparative analysis of numerical results with experimental data, demonstrating that the Matsuoka-Nakai criterion offers a more accurate model of the experimental data compared to the traditional Mohr–Coulomb approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信