道路交通事故风险分析方法的开发与应用

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Radfan Abdulrahman, Meshal Almoshaogeh, Husnain Haider, Fawaz Alharbi, Arshad Jamal
{"title":"道路交通事故风险分析方法的开发与应用","authors":"Radfan Abdulrahman,&nbsp;Meshal Almoshaogeh,&nbsp;Husnain Haider,&nbsp;Fawaz Alharbi,&nbsp;Arshad Jamal","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collision, rollover, swerving, and vehicle fire are road traffic accidents (RTAs) caused by driver, vehicle, and environment-related factors, resulting in diverse severity levels, such as property damages, injuries, and fatality. In addition, vagueness in detectability, e.g., close circuit television and driver admittance, culminates RTAs' risk analysis into a multifaceted problem. The present study performed root cause analysis to investigate RTAs, where the fishbone diagram categorized RTAs (e.g., collision and swerving) and identified primary (e.g., driver and environment) and secondary (e.g., overspeeding and tire burst) root causes. For 1158 km of intercity highways in Qassim (Saudi Arabia), fuzzy-failure mode and effect analysis evaluated 171 failure modes using 3500 RTAs' recorded over three years and knowledge of practice and experts. The study highlights collision, driver-related issues, and property damage as the leading category, root cause, and consequence. Comparing the baseline with the first realistic mitigation (speed camera installation) acknowledged a 53 % reduction in risk probability number. Automated driver assistance systems, rumble strips, variable speed limits, and increasing penalties for traffic violations hypothetically dropped 76 % of cumulative risk. The methodology handles limited data and subjective risk factors to help decision-makers minimize RTAs in Saudi Arabia and other jurisdictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 293-305"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and application of a risk analysis methodology for road traffic accidents\",\"authors\":\"Radfan Abdulrahman,&nbsp;Meshal Almoshaogeh,&nbsp;Husnain Haider,&nbsp;Fawaz Alharbi,&nbsp;Arshad Jamal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Collision, rollover, swerving, and vehicle fire are road traffic accidents (RTAs) caused by driver, vehicle, and environment-related factors, resulting in diverse severity levels, such as property damages, injuries, and fatality. In addition, vagueness in detectability, e.g., close circuit television and driver admittance, culminates RTAs' risk analysis into a multifaceted problem. The present study performed root cause analysis to investigate RTAs, where the fishbone diagram categorized RTAs (e.g., collision and swerving) and identified primary (e.g., driver and environment) and secondary (e.g., overspeeding and tire burst) root causes. For 1158 km of intercity highways in Qassim (Saudi Arabia), fuzzy-failure mode and effect analysis evaluated 171 failure modes using 3500 RTAs' recorded over three years and knowledge of practice and experts. The study highlights collision, driver-related issues, and property damage as the leading category, root cause, and consequence. Comparing the baseline with the first realistic mitigation (speed camera installation) acknowledged a 53 % reduction in risk probability number. Automated driver assistance systems, rumble strips, variable speed limits, and increasing penalties for traffic violations hypothetically dropped 76 % of cumulative risk. The methodology handles limited data and subjective risk factors to help decision-makers minimize RTAs in Saudi Arabia and other jurisdictions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 293-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016824012031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016824012031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碰撞、侧翻、转向和车辆起火是由驾驶员、车辆和环境相关因素造成的道路交通事故(RTA),其严重程度各不相同,如财产损失、人员伤亡等。此外,由于闭路电视和驾驶员承认等可探测性的模糊性,导致 RTA 风险分析成为一个多方面的问题。本研究对 RTA 进行了根本原因分析,其中鱼骨图对 RTA 进行了分类(如碰撞和急转弯),并确定了主要(如驾驶员和环境)和次要(如超速和轮胎爆裂)根本原因。在沙特阿拉伯卡西姆的 1158 公里城际高速公路上,模糊故障模式和影响分析利用三年来记录的 3500 次道路交通事故以及实践和专家知识,评估了 171 种故障模式。研究强调碰撞、驾驶员相关问题和财产损失是主要类别、根本原因和后果。将基线与第一个现实的缓解措施(安装测速摄像头)进行比较后发现,风险概率降低了 53%。自动驾驶辅助系统、隆隆声带、可变限速以及加大对交通违规行为的处罚力度等措施可使累积风险降低 76%。该方法可处理有限的数据和主观风险因素,帮助决策者最大限度地减少沙特阿拉伯和其他司法管辖区的道路交通事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and application of a risk analysis methodology for road traffic accidents
Collision, rollover, swerving, and vehicle fire are road traffic accidents (RTAs) caused by driver, vehicle, and environment-related factors, resulting in diverse severity levels, such as property damages, injuries, and fatality. In addition, vagueness in detectability, e.g., close circuit television and driver admittance, culminates RTAs' risk analysis into a multifaceted problem. The present study performed root cause analysis to investigate RTAs, where the fishbone diagram categorized RTAs (e.g., collision and swerving) and identified primary (e.g., driver and environment) and secondary (e.g., overspeeding and tire burst) root causes. For 1158 km of intercity highways in Qassim (Saudi Arabia), fuzzy-failure mode and effect analysis evaluated 171 failure modes using 3500 RTAs' recorded over three years and knowledge of practice and experts. The study highlights collision, driver-related issues, and property damage as the leading category, root cause, and consequence. Comparing the baseline with the first realistic mitigation (speed camera installation) acknowledged a 53 % reduction in risk probability number. Automated driver assistance systems, rumble strips, variable speed limits, and increasing penalties for traffic violations hypothetically dropped 76 % of cumulative risk. The methodology handles limited data and subjective risk factors to help decision-makers minimize RTAs in Saudi Arabia and other jurisdictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信