营养充足对重症患者炎症、呼吸系统改善和机械通气断流成功率的影响:单盲随机对照临床试验

Q3 Nursing
Hamideh mohammadi , Nafiseh Shokri-Mashhadi , Saeed Abbasi , Hossein Mahjobipoor , Maryam Eghbali Babadi
{"title":"营养充足对重症患者炎症、呼吸系统改善和机械通气断流成功率的影响:单盲随机对照临床试验","authors":"Hamideh mohammadi ,&nbsp;Nafiseh Shokri-Mashhadi ,&nbsp;Saeed Abbasi ,&nbsp;Hossein Mahjobipoor ,&nbsp;Maryam Eghbali Babadi","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This prospective interventional study aimed to investigate the effect of nutritional adequacy through a multidisciplinary approach on the success of ventilator weaning in patients admitted to ICU considering patients' nutritional status at baseline and monitoring nutritional measurements during the study.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this randomized, single-blind, two-arm clinical trial (IRCT20201229049876N1, Registration date: 2021-01-06), subjects were selected from patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of three medical centers between January 2021 and June 2022. The intervention group received multidisciplinary nutritional support rounds twice weekly, while the control group received the usual nutrition therapy (physician-centered NS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results showed that 92% of patients in the intervention group had a higher daily energy intake (≥80% of goal Kcal) compared with the control group, 62% of patients (<em>P</em>≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of BMI, and values of respiratory function parameters between the two groups (all <em>P</em>&gt; 0.1) at the end of the study. However, the mean score of the Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP), and circulating levels of C-reactive protein were significantly changed in the interventional group than in the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Applying a multidisciplinary nutrition support program could improve nutrition adequacy, CRP levels, and the BWAP score in ventilated ICU patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 227-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of nutrition adequacy on inflammation, respiratory improvement, and success of weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: A single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Hamideh mohammadi ,&nbsp;Nafiseh Shokri-Mashhadi ,&nbsp;Saeed Abbasi ,&nbsp;Hossein Mahjobipoor ,&nbsp;Maryam Eghbali Babadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This prospective interventional study aimed to investigate the effect of nutritional adequacy through a multidisciplinary approach on the success of ventilator weaning in patients admitted to ICU considering patients' nutritional status at baseline and monitoring nutritional measurements during the study.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this randomized, single-blind, two-arm clinical trial (IRCT20201229049876N1, Registration date: 2021-01-06), subjects were selected from patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of three medical centers between January 2021 and June 2022. The intervention group received multidisciplinary nutritional support rounds twice weekly, while the control group received the usual nutrition therapy (physician-centered NS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results showed that 92% of patients in the intervention group had a higher daily energy intake (≥80% of goal Kcal) compared with the control group, 62% of patients (<em>P</em>≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of BMI, and values of respiratory function parameters between the two groups (all <em>P</em>&gt; 0.1) at the end of the study. However, the mean score of the Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP), and circulating levels of C-reactive protein were significantly changed in the interventional group than in the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Applying a multidisciplinary nutrition support program could improve nutrition adequacy, CRP levels, and the BWAP score in ventilated ICU patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nutrition Open Science\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 227-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nutrition Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项前瞻性干预研究旨在通过多学科方法研究营养充足性对重症监护室住院患者呼吸机断流成功率的影响,研究中考虑了患者的基线营养状况并监测了营养测量结果。材料与方法在这项随机、单盲、双臂临床试验(IRCT20201229049876N1,注册日期:2021-01-06)中,受试者选自 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在三家医疗中心的重症监护病房(ICU)接受机械通气治疗的患者。结果我们的研究结果显示,与对照组62%的患者相比,干预组92%的患者每日能量摄入量更高(≥目标千卡的80%)(P≤0.05)。研究结束时,两组患者的体重指数和呼吸功能参数值无明显差异(P> 0.1)。结论应用多学科营养支持计划可改善 ICU 通气患者的营养充足性、CRP 水平和 BWAP 评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of nutrition adequacy on inflammation, respiratory improvement, and success of weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: A single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

This prospective interventional study aimed to investigate the effect of nutritional adequacy through a multidisciplinary approach on the success of ventilator weaning in patients admitted to ICU considering patients' nutritional status at baseline and monitoring nutritional measurements during the study.

Materials and methods

In this randomized, single-blind, two-arm clinical trial (IRCT20201229049876N1, Registration date: 2021-01-06), subjects were selected from patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of three medical centers between January 2021 and June 2022. The intervention group received multidisciplinary nutritional support rounds twice weekly, while the control group received the usual nutrition therapy (physician-centered NS).

Results

Our results showed that 92% of patients in the intervention group had a higher daily energy intake (≥80% of goal Kcal) compared with the control group, 62% of patients (P≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of BMI, and values of respiratory function parameters between the two groups (all P> 0.1) at the end of the study. However, the mean score of the Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP), and circulating levels of C-reactive protein were significantly changed in the interventional group than in the control group.

Conclusion

Applying a multidisciplinary nutrition support program could improve nutrition adequacy, CRP levels, and the BWAP score in ventilated ICU patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信