James C. Coons , Jennifer Kliner , Michael A. Mathier , Suresh Mulukutla , Floyd Thoma , Ahmet Sezer , Mary Keebler
{"title":"优化用药诊所降低了射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的住院率和死亡率","authors":"James C. Coons , Jennifer Kliner , Michael A. Mathier , Suresh Mulukutla , Floyd Thoma , Ahmet Sezer , Mary Keebler","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Large health system with academic and community hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>GDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan−Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication optimization clinic decreases hospitalizations and mortality for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction\",\"authors\":\"James C. Coons , Jennifer Kliner , Michael A. Mathier , Suresh Mulukutla , Floyd Thoma , Ahmet Sezer , Mary Keebler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Large health system with academic and community hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>GDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan−Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224001137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224001137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的评估药物优化门诊(MOC)与常规护理对高频低氧血症(HFrEF)患者GDMT和预后的影响.设计对一个多站点MOC进行了回顾性评估.设置由学术医院和社区医院组成的大型医疗系统.参与者由心脏病专家转诊至MOC的高频低氧血症(HFrEF)患者与常规护理.干预由高级医疗服务提供者或临床药剂师通过每周的远程医疗访问管理GDMT的使用.主要结果测量主要结果是高频住院。还评估了心血管疾病住院率和全因死亡率。结果1419名MOC组患者与5116名对照组患者进行了比较。在 MOC 组中,GDMT 的使用率明显更高:四联疗法(49 % vs. 19 %;p <;0.0001)、血管紧张素受体肾素抑制剂(62 % vs. 45 %;p <;0.0001)、β-受体阻滞剂(92 % vs. 88 %;p <;0.0001)。88%;p <;0.0001)、矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(69% 对 45%;p <;0.0001)和钠葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂(68% 对 35%;p <;0.0001)。竞争风险分析表明,在所有时间点(3、6 和 12 个月),MOC 与对照组相比,心房颤动和冠心病住院率均显著降低(p <0.001)。MOC与对照组相比,全因死亡率在6个月(p = 0.006)和12个月(p < 0.001)时明显降低,但在3个月(p = 0.35)时并无差异。
Medication optimization clinic decreases hospitalizations and mortality for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Study objective
To evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care.
Design
Retrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted.
Setting
Large health system with academic and community hospitals.
Participants
Patients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care.
Interventions
GDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan−Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted.
Results
1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control.
Conclusions
MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.