API 等级钢的机械性能和抗咬合性能：比较研究

IF 5.3 1区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL

Wear Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2024.205593

Juan P. Abdelnabe , Walter R. Tuckart , Martín I. Crespo , Germán Prieto

{"title":"API 等级钢的机械性能和抗咬合性能：比较研究","authors":"Juan P. Abdelnabe , Walter R. Tuckart , Martín I. Crespo , Germán Prieto","doi":"10.1016/j.wear.2024.205593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Galling is a type of wear that affects the oil and gas industry causing loss of profits due to unexpected stops in the exploration and extraction process. In the present work, the galling resistance of four API grade steels (L80 type 1, T95 type 2, P110, and Q125) used in the industry was evaluated by means of cross-cylinder tests. The surfaces were analyzed, and a Galling Tendency number was computed in order to rank the materials. Additionally, tensile and hardness tests were conducted to analyze the influence of the mechanical properties on galling. It was found that P110 exhibited the worst response and T95 the best one. For materials with the same ductility, an increase in strength is associated with higher galling resistance. A new index, based on the ductility and yield strength of the material, is proposed to predict the galling performance, demonstrating a strong correlation with the galling tendency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23970,"journal":{"name":"Wear","volume":"560 ","pages":"Article 205593"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical properties and galling resistance of API grade steels: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Juan P. Abdelnabe , Walter R. Tuckart , Martín I. Crespo , Germán Prieto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wear.2024.205593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Galling is a type of wear that affects the oil and gas industry causing loss of profits due to unexpected stops in the exploration and extraction process. In the present work, the galling resistance of four API grade steels (L80 type 1, T95 type 2, P110, and Q125) used in the industry was evaluated by means of cross-cylinder tests. The surfaces were analyzed, and a Galling Tendency number was computed in order to rank the materials. Additionally, tensile and hardness tests were conducted to analyze the influence of the mechanical properties on galling. It was found that P110 exhibited the worst response and T95 the best one. For materials with the same ductility, an increase in strength is associated with higher galling resistance. A new index, based on the ductility and yield strength of the material, is proposed to predict the galling performance, demonstrating a strong correlation with the galling tendency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wear\",\"volume\":\"560 \",\"pages\":\"Article 205593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wear\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164824003582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wear","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164824003582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

咬合是影响石油和天然气行业的一种磨损，由于勘探和开采过程中的意外停顿而造成利润损失。在本研究中，通过跨缸试验评估了工业中使用的四种 API 等级钢材（L80 1 型、T95 2 型、P110 和 Q125）的抗咬合性能。对表面进行了分析，并计算出了绞合倾向数，以便对材料进行排序。此外，还进行了拉伸和硬度测试，以分析机械性能对咬合的影响。结果发现，P110 的反应最差，而 T95 的反应最好。对于具有相同延展性的材料，强度的增加与更高的抗咬合性相关。根据材料的延展性和屈服强度，提出了一种新的指数来预测咬合性能，该指数与咬合趋势有很强的相关性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Mechanical properties and galling resistance of API grade steels: A comparative study

查看原文本刊更多论文

Mechanical properties and galling resistance of API grade steels: A comparative study

Galling is a type of wear that affects the oil and gas industry causing loss of profits due to unexpected stops in the exploration and extraction process. In the present work, the galling resistance of four API grade steels (L80 type 1, T95 type 2, P110, and Q125) used in the industry was evaluated by means of cross-cylinder tests. The surfaces were analyzed, and a Galling Tendency number was computed in order to rank the materials. Additionally, tensile and hardness tests were conducted to analyze the influence of the mechanical properties on galling. It was found that P110 exhibited the worst response and T95 the best one. For materials with the same ductility, an increase in strength is associated with higher galling resistance. A new index, based on the ductility and yield strength of the material, is proposed to predict the galling performance, demonstrating a strong correlation with the galling tendency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Wear 工程技术-材料科学：综合

CiteScore

8.80

自引率

8.00%

发文量

280

审稿时长

47 days

期刊介绍： Wear journal is dedicated to the advancement of basic and applied knowledge concerning the nature of wear of materials. Broadly, topics of interest range from development of fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of wear to innovative solutions to practical engineering problems. Authors of experimental studies are expected to comment on the repeatability of the data, and whenever possible, conduct multiple measurements under similar testing conditions. Further, Wear embraces the highest standards of professional ethics, and the detection of matching content, either in written or graphical form, from other publications by the current authors or by others, may result in rejection.