匹配吗?德国多公寓建筑中的智能家居能源管理技术和用户舒适度实践

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Simon Moeller
{"title":"匹配吗?德国多公寓建筑中的智能家居能源管理技术和用户舒适度实践","authors":"Simon Moeller","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy-savings from smart home technologies (SHT) are a topic of considerable debate: While proponents of SHT emphasise the potential to reduce heating energy consumption and facilitate energy flexibility, critics highlight real-world challenges and a lack of evidence of actual savings. This study provides insights into SHT's actual saving potential and reveals essential mechanisms of occupant-technology interaction.</div><div>Based on social practice theory, this paper explores how occupants integrate SHT into their everyday comfort practices. Furthermore, it assesses the resulting impacts on heating energy consumption and compares these interactions to those within conventional building settings. The interactions with a pilot SHT are evaluated in 137 apartments in two newly constructed multi-apartment buildings. For comparison, a survey of households in conventional buildings, which vary in age, size and heating demand, is analysed. The case study employs a mixed-methods approach, based on standardised surveys, house tours, and measurement data, including metered energy consumption and indoor temperatures.</div><div>The findings suggest that households in conventional German buildings have become accustomed to temperature variations within apartments. However, a preference for thermal variation appears to conflict with the dominant features of SHT, which, as this study implies, tend to produce more homogeneous indoor temperatures. The study identifies four distinct interaction patterns based on an in-depth analysis of heating comfort practices. These patterns vary in how well material settings align with comfort practices, ranging from low to high efficiency. The results indicate that SHT does not offer a ‘matching’ one-size-fits-all solution for residents' diverse needs and heating demands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103794"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it a match? Smart home energy management technologies and user comfort practices in German multi-apartment buildings\",\"authors\":\"Simon Moeller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy-savings from smart home technologies (SHT) are a topic of considerable debate: While proponents of SHT emphasise the potential to reduce heating energy consumption and facilitate energy flexibility, critics highlight real-world challenges and a lack of evidence of actual savings. This study provides insights into SHT's actual saving potential and reveals essential mechanisms of occupant-technology interaction.</div><div>Based on social practice theory, this paper explores how occupants integrate SHT into their everyday comfort practices. Furthermore, it assesses the resulting impacts on heating energy consumption and compares these interactions to those within conventional building settings. The interactions with a pilot SHT are evaluated in 137 apartments in two newly constructed multi-apartment buildings. For comparison, a survey of households in conventional buildings, which vary in age, size and heating demand, is analysed. The case study employs a mixed-methods approach, based on standardised surveys, house tours, and measurement data, including metered energy consumption and indoor temperatures.</div><div>The findings suggest that households in conventional German buildings have become accustomed to temperature variations within apartments. However, a preference for thermal variation appears to conflict with the dominant features of SHT, which, as this study implies, tend to produce more homogeneous indoor temperatures. The study identifies four distinct interaction patterns based on an in-depth analysis of heating comfort practices. These patterns vary in how well material settings align with comfort practices, ranging from low to high efficiency. The results indicate that SHT does not offer a ‘matching’ one-size-fits-all solution for residents' diverse needs and heating demands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能家居技术(SHT)的节能效果是一个备受争议的话题:SHT 的支持者强调其降低供暖能耗和促进能源灵活性的潜力,批评者则强调其在现实世界中面临的挑战以及缺乏实际节能效果的证据。本文以社会实践理论为基础,探讨了住户如何将 SHT 融入其日常舒适性实践中。此外,本文还评估了由此产生的对供暖能耗的影响,并将这些互动与传统建筑环境中的互动进行了比较。本文在两栋新建多公寓楼的 137 套公寓中评估了与试验性 SHT 的互动情况。为了进行比较,还对传统建筑中的住户进行了调查分析,这些住户的年龄、面积和供暖需求各不相同。案例研究采用了一种混合方法,基于标准化调查、房屋参观和测量数据,包括计量能源消耗和室内温度。然而,对温度变化的偏好似乎与 SHT 的主要特征相冲突,正如本研究暗示的那样,SHT 的主要特征倾向于产生更均匀的室内温度。本研究根据对采暖舒适度实践的深入分析,确定了四种不同的互动模式。这些模式在材料设置与舒适度的匹配程度上各不相同,效率从低到高不等。研究结果表明,SHT 并不能为居民的不同需求和供暖要求提供 "匹配 "的一刀切解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it a match? Smart home energy management technologies and user comfort practices in German multi-apartment buildings
Energy-savings from smart home technologies (SHT) are a topic of considerable debate: While proponents of SHT emphasise the potential to reduce heating energy consumption and facilitate energy flexibility, critics highlight real-world challenges and a lack of evidence of actual savings. This study provides insights into SHT's actual saving potential and reveals essential mechanisms of occupant-technology interaction.
Based on social practice theory, this paper explores how occupants integrate SHT into their everyday comfort practices. Furthermore, it assesses the resulting impacts on heating energy consumption and compares these interactions to those within conventional building settings. The interactions with a pilot SHT are evaluated in 137 apartments in two newly constructed multi-apartment buildings. For comparison, a survey of households in conventional buildings, which vary in age, size and heating demand, is analysed. The case study employs a mixed-methods approach, based on standardised surveys, house tours, and measurement data, including metered energy consumption and indoor temperatures.
The findings suggest that households in conventional German buildings have become accustomed to temperature variations within apartments. However, a preference for thermal variation appears to conflict with the dominant features of SHT, which, as this study implies, tend to produce more homogeneous indoor temperatures. The study identifies four distinct interaction patterns based on an in-depth analysis of heating comfort practices. These patterns vary in how well material settings align with comfort practices, ranging from low to high efficiency. The results indicate that SHT does not offer a ‘matching’ one-size-fits-all solution for residents' diverse needs and heating demands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信