测量血脂组合的受试者的脂蛋白 (a) 检测模式:梅奥诊所的经验

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"测量血脂组合的受试者的脂蛋白 (a) 检测模式:梅奥诊所的经验","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been associated with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD). Approximately 20 % of the population has elevated Lp(a). Despite its well-recognized role in ASCVD, universal screening remains controversial. The aim of our study is to investigate laboratory testing patterns for Lp(a) in subjects screened with a standard lipid panel at a large tertiary referring US institution.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were retrospectively collected at Mayo Clinic from the Mayo Data Explorer (MDE). Subjects were included if they had a lipid panel measured between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023. Demographic data, Lp(a) measurements, statins and aspirin prescription and ASCVD events which occurred at any time in the life of a subject were recorded along with respective dates. The cumulative number of Lp(a) laboratory test orders were also tallied from 1994 to 2023 independently of the lipid panel requests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, 257,225 subjects had a lipid panel ordered. Of these, only 386 (0.15 %) had Lp(a) tested within 1 year of the lipid panel, while 2406 (0.94 %) had Lp(a) tested at any time. Lp(a) was tested more frequently in males (67 %) and in subjects who developed Myocardial Infarction (MI) at any time (12 %). Following Lp(a) results, there was no significant change in statin or aspirin prescription associated with Lp(a) levels. Secondary prevention was the main setting for ordering Lp(a) testing, and there was no change in this trend throughout the years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Testing rates for Lp(a) in the general population are low and the main setting remains secondary prevention. Women are less tested than men. When Lp(a) is found to be elevated, often times there is no change in patient management to mitigate the ASCVD risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipoprotein (a) testing patterns among subjects with a measured lipid panel: The Mayo Clinic experience\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been associated with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD). Approximately 20 % of the population has elevated Lp(a). Despite its well-recognized role in ASCVD, universal screening remains controversial. The aim of our study is to investigate laboratory testing patterns for Lp(a) in subjects screened with a standard lipid panel at a large tertiary referring US institution.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were retrospectively collected at Mayo Clinic from the Mayo Data Explorer (MDE). Subjects were included if they had a lipid panel measured between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023. Demographic data, Lp(a) measurements, statins and aspirin prescription and ASCVD events which occurred at any time in the life of a subject were recorded along with respective dates. The cumulative number of Lp(a) laboratory test orders were also tallied from 1994 to 2023 independently of the lipid panel requests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, 257,225 subjects had a lipid panel ordered. Of these, only 386 (0.15 %) had Lp(a) tested within 1 year of the lipid panel, while 2406 (0.94 %) had Lp(a) tested at any time. Lp(a) was tested more frequently in males (67 %) and in subjects who developed Myocardial Infarction (MI) at any time (12 %). Following Lp(a) results, there was no significant change in statin or aspirin prescription associated with Lp(a) levels. Secondary prevention was the main setting for ordering Lp(a) testing, and there was no change in this trend throughout the years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Testing rates for Lp(a) in the general population are low and the main setting remains secondary prevention. Women are less tested than men. When Lp(a) is found to be elevated, often times there is no change in patient management to mitigate the ASCVD risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400254X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400254X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)有关。约有 20% 的人脂蛋白(a)升高。尽管人们已充分认识到脂蛋白(a)在 ASCVD 中的作用,但普遍筛查仍存在争议。我们的研究旨在调查美国一家大型三级转诊机构用标准血脂组合筛查受试者的脂蛋白(a)实验室检测模式。在 2022 年 5 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 30 日期间测量过血脂的受试者均被纳入其中。受试者的人口统计学数据、脂蛋白(a)测量值、他汀类药物和阿司匹林处方以及受试者一生中任何时候发生的 ASCVD 事件都会被记录下来,并注明相应的日期。此外,还统计了 1994 年至 2023 年期间 Lp(a) 实验室检测订单的累计数量,这些订单与血脂检测请求无关。结果在 2022 年 5 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 30 日期间,257225 名受试者接受了血脂检测。其中,只有 386 人(0.15%)在血脂检查后 1 年内进行了脂蛋白(a)检测,2406 人(0.94%)在任何时间进行了脂蛋白(a)检测。男性(67%)和在任何时间发生心肌梗死(MI)的受试者(12%)更经常接受脂蛋白(a)检测。在得出脂蛋白(a)结果后,他汀类药物或阿司匹林处方与脂蛋白(a)水平没有明显关联。二级预防是进行脂蛋白(a)检测的主要场所,多年来这一趋势没有变化。女性的检测率低于男性。当发现脂蛋白(a)升高时,通常不会改变对患者的管理,以降低 ASCVD 风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lipoprotein (a) testing patterns among subjects with a measured lipid panel: The Mayo Clinic experience

Lipoprotein (a) testing patterns among subjects with a measured lipid panel: The Mayo Clinic experience

Objective

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been associated with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD). Approximately 20 % of the population has elevated Lp(a). Despite its well-recognized role in ASCVD, universal screening remains controversial. The aim of our study is to investigate laboratory testing patterns for Lp(a) in subjects screened with a standard lipid panel at a large tertiary referring US institution.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected at Mayo Clinic from the Mayo Data Explorer (MDE). Subjects were included if they had a lipid panel measured between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023. Demographic data, Lp(a) measurements, statins and aspirin prescription and ASCVD events which occurred at any time in the life of a subject were recorded along with respective dates. The cumulative number of Lp(a) laboratory test orders were also tallied from 1994 to 2023 independently of the lipid panel requests.

Results

Between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, 257,225 subjects had a lipid panel ordered. Of these, only 386 (0.15 %) had Lp(a) tested within 1 year of the lipid panel, while 2406 (0.94 %) had Lp(a) tested at any time. Lp(a) was tested more frequently in males (67 %) and in subjects who developed Myocardial Infarction (MI) at any time (12 %). Following Lp(a) results, there was no significant change in statin or aspirin prescription associated with Lp(a) levels. Secondary prevention was the main setting for ordering Lp(a) testing, and there was no change in this trend throughout the years.

Conclusions

Testing rates for Lp(a) in the general population are low and the main setting remains secondary prevention. Women are less tested than men. When Lp(a) is found to be elevated, often times there is no change in patient management to mitigate the ASCVD risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信