评估潜在的交叉反应和声称对喹诺酮类药物过敏的住院病人的特征

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
A. Jain
{"title":"评估潜在的交叉反应和声称对喹诺酮类药物过敏的住院病人的特征","authors":"A. Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While penicillin allergy research has established the crucial utility of accurate registration of prevalence, characteristics, and diagnosis of ß-lactam allergy, other types of antibiotic allergies have only been partially investigated. The primary objective of this study is to better assess quinolone cross-reactivity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was performed for all adult inpatients with an index documented history of immediate hypersensitivity to quinolone(s) who received a subsequent systemic quinolone. The primary outcome was immediate hypersensitivity reaction to a second quinolone other than the index quinolone allergy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 54 cases met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 67 years old, 74.1% female, and average hospital LOS 3.8 days. Index fluoroquinolone allergy history, in order of prevalence, included rash, hives, anaphylaxis, tendonitis, syncope, unknown, mental status changes, and hemolytic anemia. Of the 54 cases, 3.7% (2/54) experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction after second quinolone exposure to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and/or moxifloxacin. Within the ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin index allergy cohorts, the frequency of cross-reactivity was 0% for each index allergy cohort (0/18, 0/25, and 0/0 respectively). The only immediate hypersensitivity reactions noted were for patients claiming an allergy to levofloxacin, who received subsequent reexposure to levofloxacin (18.2%; 2/11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our data demonstrated a quinolone cross-reactivity frequency of 0%. Despite our relatively small sample size, these results highlighted the likely low risk of experiencing a cross-reaction when exposed to a different quinolone. With further research and larger sample sizes, this low cross-reactivity frequency can offer practitioners clinical guidance for implications of in-class alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":"133 6","pages":"Page S16"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL CROSS-REACTIVITY REACTIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HOSPITAL INPATIENTS CLAIMING A QUINOLONE DRUG ALLERGY\",\"authors\":\"A. Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While penicillin allergy research has established the crucial utility of accurate registration of prevalence, characteristics, and diagnosis of ß-lactam allergy, other types of antibiotic allergies have only been partially investigated. The primary objective of this study is to better assess quinolone cross-reactivity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was performed for all adult inpatients with an index documented history of immediate hypersensitivity to quinolone(s) who received a subsequent systemic quinolone. The primary outcome was immediate hypersensitivity reaction to a second quinolone other than the index quinolone allergy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 54 cases met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 67 years old, 74.1% female, and average hospital LOS 3.8 days. Index fluoroquinolone allergy history, in order of prevalence, included rash, hives, anaphylaxis, tendonitis, syncope, unknown, mental status changes, and hemolytic anemia. Of the 54 cases, 3.7% (2/54) experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction after second quinolone exposure to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and/or moxifloxacin. Within the ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin index allergy cohorts, the frequency of cross-reactivity was 0% for each index allergy cohort (0/18, 0/25, and 0/0 respectively). The only immediate hypersensitivity reactions noted were for patients claiming an allergy to levofloxacin, who received subsequent reexposure to levofloxacin (18.2%; 2/11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our data demonstrated a quinolone cross-reactivity frequency of 0%. Despite our relatively small sample size, these results highlighted the likely low risk of experiencing a cross-reaction when exposed to a different quinolone. With further research and larger sample sizes, this low cross-reactivity frequency can offer practitioners clinical guidance for implications of in-class alternatives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"133 6\",\"pages\":\"Page S16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624006215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624006215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:青霉素过敏研究证实了准确登记ß-内酰胺过敏的患病率、特征和诊断的重要作用,但对其他类型的抗生素过敏仅进行了部分调查。本研究的主要目的是更好地评估喹诺酮类药物的交叉反应性。研究方法:对所有对喹诺酮类药物过敏的成人住院患者进行回顾性病历审查,这些患者均有对喹诺酮类药物过敏的病史记录,且随后接受了系统性喹诺酮类药物治疗。结果 共有 54 例符合纳入标准,平均年龄为 67 岁,74.1% 为女性,平均住院时间为 3.8 天。氟喹诺酮类药物过敏的病史依次为皮疹、荨麻疹、过敏性休克、肌腱炎、晕厥、不明原因、精神状态改变和溶血性贫血。在 54 例病例中,有 3.7%(2/54)的患者在第二次接触环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和/或莫西沙星等喹诺酮类药物后立即出现超敏反应。在环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星指数过敏队列中,每个指数过敏队列的交叉反应频率均为 0%(分别为 0/18、0/25 和 0/0)。唯一发现的即刻超敏反应是对左氧氟沙星过敏的患者,他们随后再次接触了左氧氟沙星(18.2%;2/11)。尽管我们的样本量相对较小,但这些结果突显出在接触不同喹诺酮类药物时发生交叉反应的风险可能很低。随着进一步的研究和样本量的增加,这种低交叉反应频率可为从业人员提供临床指导,帮助他们了解课内替代药物的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL CROSS-REACTIVITY REACTIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HOSPITAL INPATIENTS CLAIMING A QUINOLONE DRUG ALLERGY

Introduction

While penicillin allergy research has established the crucial utility of accurate registration of prevalence, characteristics, and diagnosis of ß-lactam allergy, other types of antibiotic allergies have only been partially investigated. The primary objective of this study is to better assess quinolone cross-reactivity.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for all adult inpatients with an index documented history of immediate hypersensitivity to quinolone(s) who received a subsequent systemic quinolone. The primary outcome was immediate hypersensitivity reaction to a second quinolone other than the index quinolone allergy.

Results

A total of 54 cases met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 67 years old, 74.1% female, and average hospital LOS 3.8 days. Index fluoroquinolone allergy history, in order of prevalence, included rash, hives, anaphylaxis, tendonitis, syncope, unknown, mental status changes, and hemolytic anemia. Of the 54 cases, 3.7% (2/54) experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction after second quinolone exposure to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and/or moxifloxacin. Within the ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin index allergy cohorts, the frequency of cross-reactivity was 0% for each index allergy cohort (0/18, 0/25, and 0/0 respectively). The only immediate hypersensitivity reactions noted were for patients claiming an allergy to levofloxacin, who received subsequent reexposure to levofloxacin (18.2%; 2/11).

Conclusion

Our data demonstrated a quinolone cross-reactivity frequency of 0%. Despite our relatively small sample size, these results highlighted the likely low risk of experiencing a cross-reaction when exposed to a different quinolone. With further research and larger sample sizes, this low cross-reactivity frequency can offer practitioners clinical guidance for implications of in-class alternatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信