在支持组织的同时保护自己:对COVID-19大流行第一年医护人员的应对策略和组织复原过程的纵向探索性研究

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Pauline Roos , Typhaine M. Juvet , Sandrine Corbaz-Kurth , Lamyae Benzakour , Sara Cereghetti , Claude-Alexandre Fournier , Gregory Moullec , Alice Nguyen , Jean-Claude Suard , Laure Vieux , Hannah Wozniak , Jacques A. Pralong , Rafaël Weissbrodt
{"title":"在支持组织的同时保护自己:对COVID-19大流行第一年医护人员的应对策略和组织复原过程的纵向探索性研究","authors":"Pauline Roos ,&nbsp;Typhaine M. Juvet ,&nbsp;Sandrine Corbaz-Kurth ,&nbsp;Lamyae Benzakour ,&nbsp;Sara Cereghetti ,&nbsp;Claude-Alexandre Fournier ,&nbsp;Gregory Moullec ,&nbsp;Alice Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Suard ,&nbsp;Laure Vieux ,&nbsp;Hannah Wozniak ,&nbsp;Jacques A. Pralong ,&nbsp;Rafaël Weissbrodt","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major source of stress for health professionals and health institutions. In response, healthcare workers adapted their behaviours to protect their health and the organisational resilience of their institutions. The study aimed to explore these individual coping and organisational resilience strategies and their evolution during the first year of the pandemic. Based on a mixed and longitudinal protocol, the study included staff from several French-speaking Swiss healthcare institutions. Participants completed an online questionnaire three times during the first year of the pandemic. They described daily problematic work situations, coping styles, and organisational resilience strategies. ‘Problem solving’ was the most frequently reported coping style, followed by ‘positive thinking’, and in a lesser extent ‘seeking social support’ and ‘avoidance’. A high level of ‘problem solving’ and ‘positive thinking’ was associated with well-managed situations, learning and development of new work practices and higher team performance. A higher level of ‘seeking social support’ and ‘avoidance’ tended to be associated with high-risk problematic situations that hindered organisation resilience. Coping strategies differed depending on profession, job tenure and hierarchical status. The article concludes with recommendations for improving both organisational resilience and individual workers’ well-being in healthcare institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting oneself while supporting the organisation: A longitudinal exploratory study of healthcare workers’ coping strategies and organisational resilience processes in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Roos ,&nbsp;Typhaine M. Juvet ,&nbsp;Sandrine Corbaz-Kurth ,&nbsp;Lamyae Benzakour ,&nbsp;Sara Cereghetti ,&nbsp;Claude-Alexandre Fournier ,&nbsp;Gregory Moullec ,&nbsp;Alice Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Suard ,&nbsp;Laure Vieux ,&nbsp;Hannah Wozniak ,&nbsp;Jacques A. Pralong ,&nbsp;Rafaël Weissbrodt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major source of stress for health professionals and health institutions. In response, healthcare workers adapted their behaviours to protect their health and the organisational resilience of their institutions. The study aimed to explore these individual coping and organisational resilience strategies and their evolution during the first year of the pandemic. Based on a mixed and longitudinal protocol, the study included staff from several French-speaking Swiss healthcare institutions. Participants completed an online questionnaire three times during the first year of the pandemic. They described daily problematic work situations, coping styles, and organisational resilience strategies. ‘Problem solving’ was the most frequently reported coping style, followed by ‘positive thinking’, and in a lesser extent ‘seeking social support’ and ‘avoidance’. A high level of ‘problem solving’ and ‘positive thinking’ was associated with well-managed situations, learning and development of new work practices and higher team performance. A higher level of ‘seeking social support’ and ‘avoidance’ tended to be associated with high-risk problematic situations that hindered organisation resilience. Coping strategies differed depending on profession, job tenure and hierarchical status. The article concludes with recommendations for improving both organisational resilience and individual workers’ well-being in healthcare institutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524002923\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524002923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行给医护人员和医疗机构带来了巨大压力。作为应对措施,医护人员调整了自己的行为,以保护自己的健康和所在机构的组织复原力。本研究旨在探讨这些个人应对策略和机构复原力策略及其在大流行病第一年期间的演变情况。这项研究以混合和纵向方案为基础,研究对象包括瑞士多家法语医疗机构的工作人员。参与者在大流行的第一年内三次完成了在线问卷调查。他们描述了日常工作中遇到的问题、应对方式和组织复原策略。解决问题 "是最常见的应对方式,其次是 "积极思考",再次是 "寻求社会支持 "和 "回避"。高水平的 "解决问题 "和 "积极思考 "与管理良好的情况、学习和发展新的工作方法以及更高的团队绩效有关。而 "寻求社会支持 "和 "回避 "的程度越高,往往与高风险的问题情境相关,从而阻碍了组织的恢复能力。应对策略因职业、工作年限和等级地位而异。文章最后就如何提高医疗机构的组织复原力和员工个人福祉提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protecting oneself while supporting the organisation: A longitudinal exploratory study of healthcare workers’ coping strategies and organisational resilience processes in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major source of stress for health professionals and health institutions. In response, healthcare workers adapted their behaviours to protect their health and the organisational resilience of their institutions. The study aimed to explore these individual coping and organisational resilience strategies and their evolution during the first year of the pandemic. Based on a mixed and longitudinal protocol, the study included staff from several French-speaking Swiss healthcare institutions. Participants completed an online questionnaire three times during the first year of the pandemic. They described daily problematic work situations, coping styles, and organisational resilience strategies. ‘Problem solving’ was the most frequently reported coping style, followed by ‘positive thinking’, and in a lesser extent ‘seeking social support’ and ‘avoidance’. A high level of ‘problem solving’ and ‘positive thinking’ was associated with well-managed situations, learning and development of new work practices and higher team performance. A higher level of ‘seeking social support’ and ‘avoidance’ tended to be associated with high-risk problematic situations that hindered organisation resilience. Coping strategies differed depending on profession, job tenure and hierarchical status. The article concludes with recommendations for improving both organisational resilience and individual workers’ well-being in healthcare institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信