跨学科研究的不确定性和隐喻的重要性:建立跨学科慢性疼痛研究团队的案例故事

T.C. Van Charldorp , M.A. Strick , J.C. de Grauw , S. Brugman , Y. Van de Burgt , L.H.H. Winkens , F.J. Meye , M. Rijsdijk , H.L.D.M. Willemen
{"title":"跨学科研究的不确定性和隐喻的重要性:建立跨学科慢性疼痛研究团队的案例故事","authors":"T.C. Van Charldorp ,&nbsp;M.A. Strick ,&nbsp;J.C. de Grauw ,&nbsp;S. Brugman ,&nbsp;Y. Van de Burgt ,&nbsp;L.H.H. Winkens ,&nbsp;F.J. Meye ,&nbsp;M. Rijsdijk ,&nbsp;H.L.D.M. Willemen","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as a key method to tackle complex societal challenges and stimulate creativity to find innovative solutions. Our key goal when starting our collaboration was to come to innovative ways of treating chronic pain. An ambitious goal that requires out-of-the-box and high-risk-high-gain research. However, interdisciplinary research in practice can be uneasy and will not always be successful. This paper describes a case story focussing on the challenges we faced building an interdisciplinary team. One of the most important lessons is that researchers from different disciplines may think they speak a universal ‘language of science’, but a thorough understanding of each other's ways of working, research paradigms, methods, and concepts is necessary before they can start working together on solving scientific questions. In fact, if researchers cannot understand each other's language, they cannot expect patients to understand scientific language either. Lastly, for academics to engage with a non-scientific audience and vice-versa, we need to find and create places to meet and find ways to interact effectively. Language is the medium through which all these interactions take place. It is therefore essential that language takes a central place in the process of collaboration across disciplines, interdisciplinary research, patient participation and public engagement. In this case story, we share our experiences in creating a common language, summarized in five steps (1: creating the team; 2: metaphor-forced introduction to disciplines; 3: creating common ground; 4: outreach; 5: integration). Metaphors play an important role in this process. We will demonstrate how we reflectively progressed through these steps while enhancing interdisciplinarity, (scientific) innovation and public engagement. This five-step journey can be used as a process-tool for any other high-risk-high-gain research team seeking to innovate through interdisciplinarity – with the risk of becoming a brilliant failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uneasiness in interdisciplinary research and the importance of metaphors: A case story on building an interdisciplinary chronic pain research team\",\"authors\":\"T.C. Van Charldorp ,&nbsp;M.A. Strick ,&nbsp;J.C. de Grauw ,&nbsp;S. Brugman ,&nbsp;Y. Van de Burgt ,&nbsp;L.H.H. Winkens ,&nbsp;F.J. Meye ,&nbsp;M. Rijsdijk ,&nbsp;H.L.D.M. Willemen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as a key method to tackle complex societal challenges and stimulate creativity to find innovative solutions. Our key goal when starting our collaboration was to come to innovative ways of treating chronic pain. An ambitious goal that requires out-of-the-box and high-risk-high-gain research. However, interdisciplinary research in practice can be uneasy and will not always be successful. This paper describes a case story focussing on the challenges we faced building an interdisciplinary team. One of the most important lessons is that researchers from different disciplines may think they speak a universal ‘language of science’, but a thorough understanding of each other's ways of working, research paradigms, methods, and concepts is necessary before they can start working together on solving scientific questions. In fact, if researchers cannot understand each other's language, they cannot expect patients to understand scientific language either. Lastly, for academics to engage with a non-scientific audience and vice-versa, we need to find and create places to meet and find ways to interact effectively. Language is the medium through which all these interactions take place. It is therefore essential that language takes a central place in the process of collaboration across disciplines, interdisciplinary research, patient participation and public engagement. In this case story, we share our experiences in creating a common language, summarized in five steps (1: creating the team; 2: metaphor-forced introduction to disciplines; 3: creating common ground; 4: outreach; 5: integration). Metaphors play an important role in this process. We will demonstrate how we reflectively progressed through these steps while enhancing interdisciplinarity, (scientific) innovation and public engagement. This five-step journey can be used as a process-tool for any other high-risk-high-gain research team seeking to innovate through interdisciplinarity – with the risk of becoming a brilliant failure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨学科研究越来越被认为是应对复杂社会挑战和激发创造力以找到创新解决方案的重要方法。我们开始合作时的主要目标是找到治疗慢性疼痛的创新方法。这是一个雄心勃勃的目标,需要打破常规、高风险高收益的研究。然而,跨学科研究在实践中可能会遇到困难,也不一定总能取得成功。本文介绍了一个案例,重点阐述了我们在组建跨学科团队时面临的挑战。其中最重要的一条经验是,来自不同学科的研究人员可能会认为他们说的是一种通用的 "科学语言",但在开始合作解决科学问题之前,他们必须对彼此的工作方式、研究范式、方法和概念有透彻的了解。事实上,如果研究人员不能理解对方的语言,就不能指望患者也能理解科学语言。最后,学术界要与非科学界的受众接触,反之亦然,我们需要找到并创造会面的场所,找到有效互动的方式。语言是进行所有这些互动的媒介。因此,在跨学科合作、跨学科研究、患者参与和公众参与的过程中,语言必须占据中心位置。在本案例故事中,我们分享了创建共同语言的经验,并将其总结为五个步骤(1:创建团队;2:以隐喻为基础的学科介绍;3:创建共同点;4:外联;5:整合)。隐喻在这一过程中发挥了重要作用。我们将展示如何通过这些步骤取得反思性进展,同时加强跨学科性、(科学)创新和公众参与。这五步旅程可作为任何其他高风险、高收益研究团队寻求通过跨学科进行创新的过程工具--冒着成为辉煌失败者的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uneasiness in interdisciplinary research and the importance of metaphors: A case story on building an interdisciplinary chronic pain research team
Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as a key method to tackle complex societal challenges and stimulate creativity to find innovative solutions. Our key goal when starting our collaboration was to come to innovative ways of treating chronic pain. An ambitious goal that requires out-of-the-box and high-risk-high-gain research. However, interdisciplinary research in practice can be uneasy and will not always be successful. This paper describes a case story focussing on the challenges we faced building an interdisciplinary team. One of the most important lessons is that researchers from different disciplines may think they speak a universal ‘language of science’, but a thorough understanding of each other's ways of working, research paradigms, methods, and concepts is necessary before they can start working together on solving scientific questions. In fact, if researchers cannot understand each other's language, they cannot expect patients to understand scientific language either. Lastly, for academics to engage with a non-scientific audience and vice-versa, we need to find and create places to meet and find ways to interact effectively. Language is the medium through which all these interactions take place. It is therefore essential that language takes a central place in the process of collaboration across disciplines, interdisciplinary research, patient participation and public engagement. In this case story, we share our experiences in creating a common language, summarized in five steps (1: creating the team; 2: metaphor-forced introduction to disciplines; 3: creating common ground; 4: outreach; 5: integration). Metaphors play an important role in this process. We will demonstrate how we reflectively progressed through these steps while enhancing interdisciplinarity, (scientific) innovation and public engagement. This five-step journey can be used as a process-tool for any other high-risk-high-gain research team seeking to innovate through interdisciplinarity – with the risk of becoming a brilliant failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信