针对有心理健康障碍的青少年的第三波干预措施:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
{"title":"针对有心理健康障碍的青少年的第三波干预措施:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Third wave interventions have demonstrated efficacy as a treatment option to promote wellbeing in adolescents. Evidence of their effectiveness for chronic mental health disorders remains unclear. The PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until March 2024 for five established interventions: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), compassion focused therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Risk of bias was assessed (QualSyst tool), and standardized mean group differences (Hedges’ <em>g</em>) with associated <em>p</em>-values, 95% confidence intervals, and prediction intervals calculated. Three randomized controlled trials and 10 single-group designs, all assessing DBT and representing 700 adolescents (most with subthreshold or full syndrome borderline personality disorder), were included. All studies were of sound methodological quality. DBT was associated with large and significant reductions in mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, emotional regulation, suicidal ideation, self-harm, and BPD symptoms; <em>g</em> range = 0.69 to 1.05) – although individual variability in treatment response was noted. Symptom improvements were maintained at follow-up (<em>g</em> range = 0.70 to 1.71), although based on limited data. Neither DBT intensity nor duration significantly moderated treatment effects. DBT is the most assessed intervention for adolescents with severe emotional or behavioral problems. Additional controlled studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the unique effects of DBT relative to other promising third wave interventions. Protocol registration: Open Science Framework [<span><span>https://osf.io/fgd2j/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>].</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Third wave interventions have demonstrated efficacy as a treatment option to promote wellbeing in adolescents. Evidence of their effectiveness for chronic mental health disorders remains unclear. The PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until March 2024 for five established interventions: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), compassion focused therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Risk of bias was assessed (QualSyst tool), and standardized mean group differences (Hedges’ <em>g</em>) with associated <em>p</em>-values, 95% confidence intervals, and prediction intervals calculated. Three randomized controlled trials and 10 single-group designs, all assessing DBT and representing 700 adolescents (most with subthreshold or full syndrome borderline personality disorder), were included. All studies were of sound methodological quality. DBT was associated with large and significant reductions in mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, emotional regulation, suicidal ideation, self-harm, and BPD symptoms; <em>g</em> range = 0.69 to 1.05) – although individual variability in treatment response was noted. Symptom improvements were maintained at follow-up (<em>g</em> range = 0.70 to 1.71), although based on limited data. Neither DBT intensity nor duration significantly moderated treatment effects. DBT is the most assessed intervention for adolescents with severe emotional or behavioral problems. Additional controlled studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the unique effects of DBT relative to other promising third wave interventions. Protocol registration: Open Science Framework [<span><span>https://osf.io/fgd2j/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>].</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724001212\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724001212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第三波干预作为一种促进青少年健康的治疗方法,已被证明具有疗效。但其对慢性精神疾病的疗效证据仍不明确。我们在 PubMed、PsycINFO、ProQuest、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库中检索了从开始到 2024 年 3 月的五种成熟的干预方法:接受与承诺疗法 (ACT)、同情疗法、辩证行为疗法 (DBT)、正念认知疗法和正念减压疗法 (MBSR)。对偏倚风险进行了评估(QualSyst 工具),并计算了标准化平均组间差异(Hedges'g)及相关的 P 值、95% 置信区间和预测区间。共纳入了 3 项随机对照试验和 10 项单组设计,所有试验都对 DBT 进行了评估,代表了 700 名青少年(大多数患有阈下或完全综合征边缘型人格障碍)。所有研究都具有良好的方法质量。DBT 能显著减少心理健康症状(抑郁、焦虑、情绪调节、自杀意念、自残和 BPD 症状;g 范围 = 0.69 至 1.05),但治疗反应存在个体差异。尽管数据有限,但症状改善在随访中得以保持(g 范围 = 0.70 至 1.71)。DBT 的强度和持续时间都没有明显调节治疗效果。DBT 是针对有严重情绪或行为问题的青少年进行的评估最多的干预措施。还需要进行更多不同样本的对照研究,以确认 DBT 相对于其他有前途的第三波干预措施的独特效果。协议注册:开放科学框架[https://osf.io/fgd2j/]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Third wave interventions have demonstrated efficacy as a treatment option to promote wellbeing in adolescents. Evidence of their effectiveness for chronic mental health disorders remains unclear. The PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until March 2024 for five established interventions: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), compassion focused therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Risk of bias was assessed (QualSyst tool), and standardized mean group differences (Hedges’ g) with associated p-values, 95% confidence intervals, and prediction intervals calculated. Three randomized controlled trials and 10 single-group designs, all assessing DBT and representing 700 adolescents (most with subthreshold or full syndrome borderline personality disorder), were included. All studies were of sound methodological quality. DBT was associated with large and significant reductions in mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, emotional regulation, suicidal ideation, self-harm, and BPD symptoms; g range = 0.69 to 1.05) – although individual variability in treatment response was noted. Symptom improvements were maintained at follow-up (g range = 0.70 to 1.71), although based on limited data. Neither DBT intensity nor duration significantly moderated treatment effects. DBT is the most assessed intervention for adolescents with severe emotional or behavioral problems. Additional controlled studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the unique effects of DBT relative to other promising third wave interventions. Protocol registration: Open Science Framework [https://osf.io/fgd2j/].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信