{"title":"误信的新视角:感知控制的计算模型","authors":"Haokui Xu , Bohao Shi , Yiming Zhu , Jifan Zhou , Mowei Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The discovery of various cognitive biases and social illusions indicates that people routinely have misbeliefs. Focusing on the illusion of control (IOC), this article argues that when time and cognitive resources are limited, and information is imperfect, misbeliefs can be generated naturally in a normal belief formation system, and these misbeliefs might help people adapt better to the environment.<!--> <!-->In this study, we present a computational model—the informativeness-weighting model (IWM)—describing how beliefs are revised by observed evidence. To be precise, IOC is the result of distinct types of evidence being endowed with different weights according to its informativeness in a belief revision process. To evaluate the model, we also designed two behavioral experiments to compare people’s sense of control with that predicted by the model.<!--> <!-->In both experiments, our model outperformed two alternative models in predicting and explaining the misestimation of people’s perceived control. Thus, we suggest that our model reflects an adaptive strategy for information processing, which helps to explain why misbeliefs, like IOC, are prevalent in human cognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new perspective on Misbeliefs: A computational model for perceived control\",\"authors\":\"Haokui Xu , Bohao Shi , Yiming Zhu , Jifan Zhou , Mowei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The discovery of various cognitive biases and social illusions indicates that people routinely have misbeliefs. Focusing on the illusion of control (IOC), this article argues that when time and cognitive resources are limited, and information is imperfect, misbeliefs can be generated naturally in a normal belief formation system, and these misbeliefs might help people adapt better to the environment.<!--> <!-->In this study, we present a computational model—the informativeness-weighting model (IWM)—describing how beliefs are revised by observed evidence. To be precise, IOC is the result of distinct types of evidence being endowed with different weights according to its informativeness in a belief revision process. To evaluate the model, we also designed two behavioral experiments to compare people’s sense of control with that predicted by the model.<!--> <!-->In both experiments, our model outperformed two alternative models in predicting and explaining the misestimation of people’s perceived control. Thus, we suggest that our model reflects an adaptive strategy for information processing, which helps to explain why misbeliefs, like IOC, are prevalent in human cognition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724000998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724000998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A new perspective on Misbeliefs: A computational model for perceived control
The discovery of various cognitive biases and social illusions indicates that people routinely have misbeliefs. Focusing on the illusion of control (IOC), this article argues that when time and cognitive resources are limited, and information is imperfect, misbeliefs can be generated naturally in a normal belief formation system, and these misbeliefs might help people adapt better to the environment. In this study, we present a computational model—the informativeness-weighting model (IWM)—describing how beliefs are revised by observed evidence. To be precise, IOC is the result of distinct types of evidence being endowed with different weights according to its informativeness in a belief revision process. To evaluate the model, we also designed two behavioral experiments to compare people’s sense of control with that predicted by the model. In both experiments, our model outperformed two alternative models in predicting and explaining the misestimation of people’s perceived control. Thus, we suggest that our model reflects an adaptive strategy for information processing, which helps to explain why misbeliefs, like IOC, are prevalent in human cognition.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial.
The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition.
Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.