{"title":"公平的 XIDS:确保入侵检测模型的公平性和透明度","authors":"Chinu, Urvashi Bansal","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>An intrusion detection system (IDS) is valuable for detecting anomalies and unauthorized access to a system or network. Due to the black-box nature of these IDS models, network experts need more trust in systems to act on alerts and transparency to understand the model's inner logic. Moreover, biased models' decisions affect the model performance and increase the false positive rates, directly affecting the model's accuracy. So, maintaining Transparency and Fairness simultaneously in IDS models is essential for accurate decision-making. Existing methods face challenges of the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, which also affects the reliability and robustness of the model. Motivated by these research gaps, we developed the Fair-XIDS model. This model clarifies its internal logic with visual explanations and promotes fairness across its entire lifecycle. The Fair-XIDS model successfully integrates complex transparency and fairness algorithms to address issues like Imbalanced datasets, algorithmic bias, and postprocessing bias with an average 85% reduction in false positive rate. To ensure reliability, the proposed model effectively mitigates the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness with an average of 90% accuracy and more than 85% fairness. The assessment results of the proposed model over diverse datasets and classifiers mark its model-agnostic nature. Overall, the model achieves more than 85% consistency among diverse classifiers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"36 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair XIDS: Ensuring fairness and transparency in intrusion detection models\",\"authors\":\"Chinu, Urvashi Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpe.8268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>An intrusion detection system (IDS) is valuable for detecting anomalies and unauthorized access to a system or network. Due to the black-box nature of these IDS models, network experts need more trust in systems to act on alerts and transparency to understand the model's inner logic. Moreover, biased models' decisions affect the model performance and increase the false positive rates, directly affecting the model's accuracy. So, maintaining Transparency and Fairness simultaneously in IDS models is essential for accurate decision-making. Existing methods face challenges of the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, which also affects the reliability and robustness of the model. Motivated by these research gaps, we developed the Fair-XIDS model. This model clarifies its internal logic with visual explanations and promotes fairness across its entire lifecycle. The Fair-XIDS model successfully integrates complex transparency and fairness algorithms to address issues like Imbalanced datasets, algorithmic bias, and postprocessing bias with an average 85% reduction in false positive rate. To ensure reliability, the proposed model effectively mitigates the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness with an average of 90% accuracy and more than 85% fairness. The assessment results of the proposed model over diverse datasets and classifiers mark its model-agnostic nature. Overall, the model achieves more than 85% consistency among diverse classifiers.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"volume\":\"36 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8268\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fair XIDS: Ensuring fairness and transparency in intrusion detection models
An intrusion detection system (IDS) is valuable for detecting anomalies and unauthorized access to a system or network. Due to the black-box nature of these IDS models, network experts need more trust in systems to act on alerts and transparency to understand the model's inner logic. Moreover, biased models' decisions affect the model performance and increase the false positive rates, directly affecting the model's accuracy. So, maintaining Transparency and Fairness simultaneously in IDS models is essential for accurate decision-making. Existing methods face challenges of the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, which also affects the reliability and robustness of the model. Motivated by these research gaps, we developed the Fair-XIDS model. This model clarifies its internal logic with visual explanations and promotes fairness across its entire lifecycle. The Fair-XIDS model successfully integrates complex transparency and fairness algorithms to address issues like Imbalanced datasets, algorithmic bias, and postprocessing bias with an average 85% reduction in false positive rate. To ensure reliability, the proposed model effectively mitigates the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness with an average of 90% accuracy and more than 85% fairness. The assessment results of the proposed model over diverse datasets and classifiers mark its model-agnostic nature. Overall, the model achieves more than 85% consistency among diverse classifiers.
期刊介绍:
Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of:
Parallel and distributed computing;
High-performance computing;
Computational and data science;
Artificial intelligence and machine learning;
Big data applications, algorithms, and systems;
Network science;
Ontologies and semantics;
Security and privacy;
Cloud/edge/fog computing;
Green computing; and
Quantum computing.