Sophie L. Russell, Mushidur Rahman, Charles J. Steward, Amy E. Harwood, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Nduka C. Okwose, Djordje G. Jakovljevic
{"title":"中心脉搏波速度和增强指数是动脉功能的重复性和再现性测量指标","authors":"Sophie L. Russell, Mushidur Rahman, Charles J. Steward, Amy E. Harwood, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Nduka C. Okwose, Djordje G. Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms<sup>−1</sup> and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, <i>p</i> < 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function\",\"authors\":\"Sophie L. Russell, Mushidur Rahman, Charles J. Steward, Amy E. Harwood, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Nduka C. Okwose, Djordje G. Jakovljevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> in healthy individuals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms<sup>−1</sup> and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, <i>p</i> < 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70155\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的 动脉功能(特别是动脉僵化)是一个重要的心血管风险因素。脉搏波速度(PWV)和增强指数(Al x $x$)是动脉功能的既定指标。本研究旨在评估健康人脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 的重复性和再现性。 方法 40 名健康参与者(年龄 33 ± 11 岁,17 名女性)接受静息仰卧脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 评估。测量结果一式三份,间隔一周重复一次。Al x $x$ 是通过肱动脉闭塞测量的,脉搏波速度是通过眼压计-颤动测量法从颈动脉到股动脉测量的。重复性和再现性采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。对 10 名参与者进行了操作员之间的再现性评估。 结果 PWV 和 Al x $x$ 的周间平均值分别为 6.20 ± 0.91 对 6.13 ± 0.91 ms-1 和 14.0 ± 11.8 对 16.3 ± 12.2%。对于当天的测量,脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 都显示出极好的重复性(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.96,95% CI:0.92-0.98,p < 0.01;Al x $x$ :ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94, p < 0.01)和操作者之间的再现性(PWV:ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98, p < 0.01)。间隔 1 周重复测量,结果显示重现性良好(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.77,95% CI:0.61-0.87,p ≤ 0.01;Al x x $x$ : ICC = 0.73,95% CI:0.73-0.86,p < 0.01)。 结论脉搏波速度和 Al x x$x$ 显示出极好的重复性和再现性。考虑到这些变量均为无创且易于测量,动脉功能评估可在常规临床实践中发挥作用,促进心血管疾病的风险分层。
Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function
Background and Aims
Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al in healthy individuals.
Methods
Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.
Results
The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms−1 and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, p < 0.01; Al: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, p < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, p < 0.01; Al: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, p < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, p ≤ 0.01; Al: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, p < 0.01).
Conclusion
PWV and Al demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.