中心脉搏波速度和增强指数是动脉功能的重复性和再现性测量指标

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sophie L. Russell, Mushidur Rahman, Charles J. Steward, Amy E. Harwood, Gordon McGregor, Prithwish Banerjee, Nduka C. Okwose, Djordje G. Jakovljevic
{"title":"中心脉搏波速度和增强指数是动脉功能的重复性和再现性测量指标","authors":"Sophie L. Russell,&nbsp;Mushidur Rahman,&nbsp;Charles J. Steward,&nbsp;Amy E. Harwood,&nbsp;Gordon McGregor,&nbsp;Prithwish Banerjee,&nbsp;Nduka C. Okwose,&nbsp;Djordje G. Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms<sup>−1</sup> and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PWV and Al<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>x</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function\",\"authors\":\"Sophie L. Russell,&nbsp;Mushidur Rahman,&nbsp;Charles J. Steward,&nbsp;Amy E. Harwood,&nbsp;Gordon McGregor,&nbsp;Prithwish Banerjee,&nbsp;Nduka C. Okwose,&nbsp;Djordje G. Jakovljevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> in healthy individuals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms<sup>−1</sup> and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>: ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>PWV and Al<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $x$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70155\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 动脉功能(特别是动脉僵化)是一个重要的心血管风险因素。脉搏波速度(PWV)和增强指数(Al x $x$)是动脉功能的既定指标。本研究旨在评估健康人脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 的重复性和再现性。 方法 40 名健康参与者(年龄 33 ± 11 岁,17 名女性)接受静息仰卧脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 评估。测量结果一式三份,间隔一周重复一次。Al x $x$ 是通过肱动脉闭塞测量的,脉搏波速度是通过眼压计-颤动测量法从颈动脉到股动脉测量的。重复性和再现性采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。对 10 名参与者进行了操作员之间的再现性评估。 结果 PWV 和 Al x $x$ 的周间平均值分别为 6.20 ± 0.91 对 6.13 ± 0.91 ms-1 和 14.0 ± 11.8 对 16.3 ± 12.2%。对于当天的测量,脉搏波速度和 Al x $x$ 都显示出极好的重复性(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.96,95% CI:0.92-0.98,p < 0.01;Al x $x$ :ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94, p < 0.01)和操作者之间的再现性(PWV:ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98, p < 0.01)。间隔 1 周重复测量,结果显示重现性良好(脉搏波速度:ICC = 0.77,95% CI:0.61-0.87,p ≤ 0.01;Al x x $x$ : ICC = 0.73,95% CI:0.73-0.86,p < 0.01)。 结论脉搏波速度和 Al x x$x$ 显示出极好的重复性和再现性。考虑到这些变量均为无创且易于测量,动脉功能评估可在常规临床实践中发挥作用,促进心血管疾病的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function

Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function

Background and Aims

Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al x $x$ ) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al x $x$ in healthy individuals.

Methods

Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al x $x$ assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al x $x$ was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer-oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants.

Results

The average values for week-to-week visits for PWV and Al x $x$ were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms−1 and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same-day measurements, both PWV and Al x $x$ showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, p < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, p < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, p ≤ 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

PWV and Al x $x$ demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy-to-measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信