2020 年南极平流层强漩涡的可预测性和臭氧的作用

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Eun-Pa Lim, Linjing Zhou, Griffith Young, S. Abhik, Irina Rudeva, Pandora Hope, Matthew C. Wheeler, Julie M. Arblaster, Harry H. Hendon, Gloria L. Manney, Seok-Woo Son, Jiyoung Oh, René D. Garreaud
{"title":"2020 年南极平流层强漩涡的可预测性和臭氧的作用","authors":"Eun-Pa Lim,&nbsp;Linjing Zhou,&nbsp;Griffith Young,&nbsp;S. Abhik,&nbsp;Irina Rudeva,&nbsp;Pandora Hope,&nbsp;Matthew C. Wheeler,&nbsp;Julie M. Arblaster,&nbsp;Harry H. Hendon,&nbsp;Gloria L. Manney,&nbsp;Seok-Woo Son,&nbsp;Jiyoung Oh,&nbsp;René D. Garreaud","doi":"10.1029/2024JD040820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The Antarctic vortex of October–December 2020 was the strongest on record in the satellite era for the season in the mid- to lower stratosphere. However, it was poorly predicted by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's operational seasonal climate forecast system of that time, ACCESS-S1, even at a short lead time of a month. Using the current operational forecast system, ACCESS-S2, we have, therefore, tried to find a primary cause of the limited predictability of this event and conducted forecast sensitivity experiments to understand the potential role of ozone in the event and its associated anomalies of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) and rainfall over south–eastern Australia and western Patagonia. Here, we show that the 2020 strong vortex event did not follow the canonical dynamical evolution seen in previous strong vortex events in spring but suddenly appeared as a result of the record-low upward propagating wave activity in September 2020. The ACCESS-S2 forecasts significantly underestimated the negative wave forcing in September even at zero lead time, irrespective of the ozone configuration, therefore falling short in predicting the record strength of the polar vortex in late spring 2020. Nevertheless, ACCESS-S2 with prescribed realistic ozone that had large anomalies in the Antarctic stratosphere significantly better predicted the strong vortex and the subsequent positive SAM and related rainfall anomalies over south–eastern Australia and western Patagonia in the austral summer of 2020–21. This highlights the potentially important role of ozone variations for seasonal climate forecasting as a source of long-lead predictability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"129 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD040820","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictability of the 2020 Strong Vortex in the Antarctic Stratosphere and the Role of Ozone\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Pa Lim,&nbsp;Linjing Zhou,&nbsp;Griffith Young,&nbsp;S. Abhik,&nbsp;Irina Rudeva,&nbsp;Pandora Hope,&nbsp;Matthew C. Wheeler,&nbsp;Julie M. Arblaster,&nbsp;Harry H. Hendon,&nbsp;Gloria L. Manney,&nbsp;Seok-Woo Son,&nbsp;Jiyoung Oh,&nbsp;René D. Garreaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD040820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>The Antarctic vortex of October–December 2020 was the strongest on record in the satellite era for the season in the mid- to lower stratosphere. However, it was poorly predicted by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's operational seasonal climate forecast system of that time, ACCESS-S1, even at a short lead time of a month. Using the current operational forecast system, ACCESS-S2, we have, therefore, tried to find a primary cause of the limited predictability of this event and conducted forecast sensitivity experiments to understand the potential role of ozone in the event and its associated anomalies of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) and rainfall over south–eastern Australia and western Patagonia. Here, we show that the 2020 strong vortex event did not follow the canonical dynamical evolution seen in previous strong vortex events in spring but suddenly appeared as a result of the record-low upward propagating wave activity in September 2020. The ACCESS-S2 forecasts significantly underestimated the negative wave forcing in September even at zero lead time, irrespective of the ozone configuration, therefore falling short in predicting the record strength of the polar vortex in late spring 2020. Nevertheless, ACCESS-S2 with prescribed realistic ozone that had large anomalies in the Antarctic stratosphere significantly better predicted the strong vortex and the subsequent positive SAM and related rainfall anomalies over south–eastern Australia and western Patagonia in the austral summer of 2020–21. This highlights the potentially important role of ozone variations for seasonal climate forecasting as a source of long-lead predictability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"129 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD040820\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD040820\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD040820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020 年 10 月至 12 月的南极漩涡是卫星时代平流层中下层最强的季节。然而,澳大利亚气象局当时的季节性气候业务预报系统 ACCESS-S1 对其预测不佳,即使在一个月的短时间内也是如此。因此,我们利用当前的业务预报系统 ACCESS-S2,试图找到导致这一事件可预测性有限的主要原因,并进行了预报敏感性实验,以了解臭氧在这一事件中的潜在作用,以及与之相关的澳大利亚东南部和巴塔哥尼亚西部的南环流模式(SAM)和降雨异常。在这里,我们表明 2020 年的强涡旋事件并没有遵循以往春季强涡旋事件中的典型动力学演变过程,而是由于 2020 年 9 月创纪录的低向上传播波活动而突然出现的。ACCESS-S2 预测大大低估了 9 月份的负波动力,即使在零准备时间内也是如此,与臭氧配置无关,因此未能预测出 2020 年春末创纪录的极地涡旋强度。尽管如此,ACCESS-S2 在南极平流层有较大异常的情况下,使用规定的现实臭氧,明显更好地预测了 2020-21 年澳大利亚东南部和巴塔哥尼亚西部夏季的强漩涡以及随后的正 SAM 和相关降雨异常。这凸显了臭氧变化作为长期可预测性来源在季节性气候预测中的潜在重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictability of the 2020 Strong Vortex in the Antarctic Stratosphere and the Role of Ozone

Predictability of the 2020 Strong Vortex in the Antarctic Stratosphere and the Role of Ozone

The Antarctic vortex of October–December 2020 was the strongest on record in the satellite era for the season in the mid- to lower stratosphere. However, it was poorly predicted by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's operational seasonal climate forecast system of that time, ACCESS-S1, even at a short lead time of a month. Using the current operational forecast system, ACCESS-S2, we have, therefore, tried to find a primary cause of the limited predictability of this event and conducted forecast sensitivity experiments to understand the potential role of ozone in the event and its associated anomalies of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) and rainfall over south–eastern Australia and western Patagonia. Here, we show that the 2020 strong vortex event did not follow the canonical dynamical evolution seen in previous strong vortex events in spring but suddenly appeared as a result of the record-low upward propagating wave activity in September 2020. The ACCESS-S2 forecasts significantly underestimated the negative wave forcing in September even at zero lead time, irrespective of the ozone configuration, therefore falling short in predicting the record strength of the polar vortex in late spring 2020. Nevertheless, ACCESS-S2 with prescribed realistic ozone that had large anomalies in the Antarctic stratosphere significantly better predicted the strong vortex and the subsequent positive SAM and related rainfall anomalies over south–eastern Australia and western Patagonia in the austral summer of 2020–21. This highlights the potentially important role of ozone variations for seasonal climate forecasting as a source of long-lead predictability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信