{"title":"牙髓治疗过的牙齿与正常牙齿最大咬合力比较的病例对照分口研究","authors":"Mohd Khairul Firdaus Mazlan, Melati Mahmud, Rohana Ahmad, Tong Wah Lim","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the maximum occlusal force (MOF) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 adult participants presenting with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited for this split-mouth study. MOFs were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean MOF of ETT was compared to that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and MOF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MOF for ETT was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11 N and 202.40 ± 70.67 N, respectively; P < .001). Among the clinical factors, the MOFs were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < .01) and the crown-root ratio (P = .01). Upon further analysis of ETT and control teeth, the location of teeth was identified as the sole factor associated with MOF, with P < .05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MOFs for ETT were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case-Control, Split-Mouth Study Comparing Maximum Occlusal Forces in Endodontically Treated Teeth and Vital Counterparts.\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Khairul Firdaus Mazlan, Melati Mahmud, Rohana Ahmad, Tong Wah Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the maximum occlusal force (MOF) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 adult participants presenting with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited for this split-mouth study. MOFs were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean MOF of ETT was compared to that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and MOF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MOF for ETT was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11 N and 202.40 ± 70.67 N, respectively; P < .001). Among the clinical factors, the MOFs were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < .01) and the crown-root ratio (P = .01). Upon further analysis of ETT and control teeth, the location of teeth was identified as the sole factor associated with MOF, with P < .05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MOFs for ETT were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Case-Control, Split-Mouth Study Comparing Maximum Occlusal Forces in Endodontically Treated Teeth and Vital Counterparts.
Purpose: To compare the maximum occlusal force (MOF) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.
Materials and methods: A total of 30 adult participants presenting with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited for this split-mouth study. MOFs were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean MOF of ETT was compared to that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and MOF.
Results: The mean MOF for ETT was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11 N and 202.40 ± 70.67 N, respectively; P < .001). Among the clinical factors, the MOFs were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < .01) and the crown-root ratio (P = .01). Upon further analysis of ETT and control teeth, the location of teeth was identified as the sole factor associated with MOF, with P < .05.
Conclusions: The MOFs for ETT were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
