3DStent 与光学相干断层扫描在评估支架面积和直径方面的一致性和可重复性。

Andrea Ruberti, Riccardo Rinaldi, Giovanni Occhipinti, Liliane Ramus, Giulio Guagliumi, Manel Sabate, Salvatore Brugaletta
{"title":"3DStent 与光学相干断层扫描在评估支架面积和直径方面的一致性和可重复性。","authors":"Andrea Ruberti, Riccardo Rinaldi, Giovanni Occhipinti, Liliane Ramus, Giulio Guagliumi, Manel Sabate, Salvatore Brugaletta","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3DStent is a novel rotational angiography imaging capable of 3D reconstruction and measuring stent area and diameter, without need for intravascular imaging. To compare 3DStent and OCT-derived stent area and diameter after PCI. Patients with de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a single DES and evaluated by OCT and 3DStent were included. Stent area and diameter were measured by 3DStent, at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side and by OCT. From September 2023 to February 2024 six coronary lesions were analyzed. Post-PCI stent area measured by OCT was (mean ± standard deviation) 7.03 ± 2.85 mm<sup>2</sup> and by 3DStent 9.41 ± 2.79 mm<sup>2</sup>, 7.21 ± 2.23 mm<sup>2</sup> and 5.63 ± 1.83 mm<sup>2</sup> at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Stent diameter by OCT was 2.93 ± 0.58 mm, and by 3DStent 3.27 ± 0.50 mm, 2.86 ± 0.49 mm and 2.52 ± 0.45 mm at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Significant correlation was observed between OCT and 3DStent in relation to stent area (Exp(B) 3.35, mean of difference 0.19 ± 1.01 mm<sup>2</sup>, 95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001) and diameter (Exp(B) 3.18, mean difference - 0.07 ± 0.18 mm, 95%CI -0.43-0.30 mm, p < 0.001), particularly when 3DStent measurements performed at the mid side. Very high reproducibility was demonstrated by intra- and inter-observer analysis (r = 0.92 and r = 0.93 respectively). 3DStent appears to be an easy and reproducible tool to assess post-PCI stent area and diameter as compared to OCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2581-2589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Ruberti, Riccardo Rinaldi, Giovanni Occhipinti, Liliane Ramus, Giulio Guagliumi, Manel Sabate, Salvatore Brugaletta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>3DStent is a novel rotational angiography imaging capable of 3D reconstruction and measuring stent area and diameter, without need for intravascular imaging. To compare 3DStent and OCT-derived stent area and diameter after PCI. Patients with de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a single DES and evaluated by OCT and 3DStent were included. Stent area and diameter were measured by 3DStent, at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side and by OCT. From September 2023 to February 2024 six coronary lesions were analyzed. Post-PCI stent area measured by OCT was (mean ± standard deviation) 7.03 ± 2.85 mm<sup>2</sup> and by 3DStent 9.41 ± 2.79 mm<sup>2</sup>, 7.21 ± 2.23 mm<sup>2</sup> and 5.63 ± 1.83 mm<sup>2</sup> at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Stent diameter by OCT was 2.93 ± 0.58 mm, and by 3DStent 3.27 ± 0.50 mm, 2.86 ± 0.49 mm and 2.52 ± 0.45 mm at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Significant correlation was observed between OCT and 3DStent in relation to stent area (Exp(B) 3.35, mean of difference 0.19 ± 1.01 mm<sup>2</sup>, 95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001) and diameter (Exp(B) 3.18, mean difference - 0.07 ± 0.18 mm, 95%CI -0.43-0.30 mm, p < 0.001), particularly when 3DStent measurements performed at the mid side. Very high reproducibility was demonstrated by intra- and inter-observer analysis (r = 0.92 and r = 0.93 respectively). 3DStent appears to be an easy and reproducible tool to assess post-PCI stent area and diameter as compared to OCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2581-2589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

3DStent 是一种新型旋转血管造影成像技术,能够进行三维重建并测量支架的面积和直径,而无需进行血管内成像。比较 PCI 后 3DStent 和 OCT 导出的支架面积和直径。纳入使用单一DES进行治疗并通过OCT和3DStent进行评估的新发冠状动脉病变患者。支架面积和直径由 3DStent 在腔内、腔中和腔底侧以及 OCT 进行测量。从 2023 年 9 月到 2024 年 2 月,对六个冠状动脉病变进行了分析。OCT 测量的PCI 后支架面积为(平均值 ± 标准差)7.03 ± 2.85 平方毫米,3DStent 测量的瘤旁、瘤中和瘤内支架面积分别为 9.41 ± 2.79 平方毫米、7.21 ± 2.23 平方毫米和 5.63 ± 1.83 平方毫米。OCT 显示的支架直径为(2.93 ± 0.58)毫米,3DStent 显示的支架直径为(3.27 ± 0.50)毫米,在腔内、腔中和腔底侧分别为(2.86 ± 0.49)毫米和(2.52 ± 0.45)毫米。在支架面积方面,OCT 和 3DStent 之间存在显著相关性(Exp(B) 3.35,差异平均值为 0.19 ± 1.01 mm2,95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm2,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter.

3DStent is a novel rotational angiography imaging capable of 3D reconstruction and measuring stent area and diameter, without need for intravascular imaging. To compare 3DStent and OCT-derived stent area and diameter after PCI. Patients with de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a single DES and evaluated by OCT and 3DStent were included. Stent area and diameter were measured by 3DStent, at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side and by OCT. From September 2023 to February 2024 six coronary lesions were analyzed. Post-PCI stent area measured by OCT was (mean ± standard deviation) 7.03 ± 2.85 mm2 and by 3DStent 9.41 ± 2.79 mm2, 7.21 ± 2.23 mm2 and 5.63 ± 1.83 mm2 at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Stent diameter by OCT was 2.93 ± 0.58 mm, and by 3DStent 3.27 ± 0.50 mm, 2.86 ± 0.49 mm and 2.52 ± 0.45 mm at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Significant correlation was observed between OCT and 3DStent in relation to stent area (Exp(B) 3.35, mean of difference 0.19 ± 1.01 mm2, 95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm2, p < 0.001) and diameter (Exp(B) 3.18, mean difference - 0.07 ± 0.18 mm, 95%CI -0.43-0.30 mm, p < 0.001), particularly when 3DStent measurements performed at the mid side. Very high reproducibility was demonstrated by intra- and inter-observer analysis (r = 0.92 and r = 0.93 respectively). 3DStent appears to be an easy and reproducible tool to assess post-PCI stent area and diameter as compared to OCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信