与美国低收入成年人相比，公共住房居民使用烟草价格最小化策略的情况。

IF 3.9 2区医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY

Drug and alcohol dependence Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112476

Craig T. Dearfield , Kasra Zarei , Kelvin Choi , Debra H. Bernat

{"title":"与美国低收入成年人相比，公共住房居民使用烟草价格最小化策略的情况。","authors":"Craig T. Dearfield , Kasra Zarei , Kelvin Choi , Debra H. Bernat","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Price minimization strategies (PMS) are ways for people to save money on tobacco purchases especially among those of lower socioeconomic status. This study assesses PMS and coupon receipt among public housing residents compared to U.S. low-income adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from adults who currently use tobacco and live in District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) public housing (n=270) and a US nationally representative sample of low-income adults who currently use tobacco (n=820). We examined the prevalence of PMS use across demographic characteristics and smoking behaviors, and qualitatively compared them across the two datasets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most DCHA resident participants (84.2 %) and US low-income adults who currently use tobacco (91.5 %) recently used at least one PMS to save money on tobacco. The top-three most common strategies among DCHA residents were saving cigarettes to finish later (35.6 %), smoking fewer cigarettes (32.2 %), and finding cheaper places to buy cigarettes (30.4 %), while among U.S. low-income adults these strategies were using coupons or promotions (62.7 %), purchasing by bulk (55.5 %), and finding cheaper places to buy tobacco products (53.6 %). People who lightly smoke in DCHA were more likely than people who heavily smoke to use PMS in general (25.0 % vs. 13.7 %) and smoke fewer cigarettes to save money (35.8 % vs. 19.2 %). US low-income people who lightly smoke were more likely than people who heavily smoke to cut back on tobacco use (61.9 % vs. 39.8 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most U.S. low-income individuals and DCHA residents who smoke engaged in PMS. Regulating these strategies while supporting tobacco use cessation may reduce the impact of tobacco in these populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"265 ","pages":"Article 112476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of tobacco price-minimization strategies among public housing residents compared to U.S. low-income adults\",\"authors\":\"Craig T. Dearfield , Kasra Zarei , Kelvin Choi , Debra H. Bernat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Price minimization strategies (PMS) are ways for people to save money on tobacco purchases especially among those of lower socioeconomic status. This study assesses PMS and coupon receipt among public housing residents compared to U.S. low-income adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from adults who currently use tobacco and live in District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) public housing (n=270) and a US nationally representative sample of low-income adults who currently use tobacco (n=820). We examined the prevalence of PMS use across demographic characteristics and smoking behaviors, and qualitatively compared them across the two datasets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most DCHA resident participants (84.2 %) and US low-income adults who currently use tobacco (91.5 %) recently used at least one PMS to save money on tobacco. The top-three most common strategies among DCHA residents were saving cigarettes to finish later (35.6 %), smoking fewer cigarettes (32.2 %), and finding cheaper places to buy cigarettes (30.4 %), while among U.S. low-income adults these strategies were using coupons or promotions (62.7 %), purchasing by bulk (55.5 %), and finding cheaper places to buy tobacco products (53.6 %). People who lightly smoke in DCHA were more likely than people who heavily smoke to use PMS in general (25.0 % vs. 13.7 %) and smoke fewer cigarettes to save money (35.8 % vs. 19.2 %). US low-income people who lightly smoke were more likely than people who heavily smoke to cut back on tobacco use (61.9 % vs. 39.8 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most U.S. low-income individuals and DCHA residents who smoke engaged in PMS. Regulating these strategies while supporting tobacco use cessation may reduce the impact of tobacco in these populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"265 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624014017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624014017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：价格最小化策略（PMS）是人们在购买烟草时省钱的方法，尤其是在社会经济地位较低的人群中。本研究评估了与美国低收入成年人相比，公共住房居民的价格最小化策略和优惠券领取情况：数据来自目前使用烟草并居住在哥伦比亚特区住房管理局（DCHA）公共住房的成年人（人数=270），以及目前使用烟草的美国全国代表性低收入成年人样本（人数=820）。我们研究了不同人口特征和吸烟行为的 PMS 使用率，并对两个数据集进行了定性比较：大多数达卡区居民参与者（84.2%）和目前使用烟草的美国低收入成年人（91.5%）最近至少使用过一次PMS，以节省烟草开支。在大昌华府居民中，最常见的前三种策略分别是将香烟留到以后再抽完（35.6%）、减少吸烟量（32.2%）和寻找更便宜的香烟购买场所（30.4%），而在美国低收入成年人中，这些策略分别是使用优惠券或促销活动（62.7%）、批量购买（55.5%）和寻找更便宜的烟草制品购买场所（53.6%）。在大中华区，轻度吸烟者比重度吸烟者更有可能在一般情况下使用PMS（25.0%对13.7%），也更有可能为了省钱而少吸烟（35.8%对19.2%）。与大量吸烟者相比，轻度吸烟的美国低收入者更有可能减少烟草使用（61.9% 对 39.8%）：结论：大多数吸烟的美国低收入者和 DCHA 居民都参与了 PMS。在支持戒烟的同时对这些策略进行规范可能会减少烟草对这些人群的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Use of tobacco price-minimization strategies among public housing residents compared to U.S. low-income adults

Background

Price minimization strategies (PMS) are ways for people to save money on tobacco purchases especially among those of lower socioeconomic status. This study assesses PMS and coupon receipt among public housing residents compared to U.S. low-income adults.

Methods

Data were from adults who currently use tobacco and live in District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) public housing (n=270) and a US nationally representative sample of low-income adults who currently use tobacco (n=820). We examined the prevalence of PMS use across demographic characteristics and smoking behaviors, and qualitatively compared them across the two datasets.

Results

Most DCHA resident participants (84.2 %) and US low-income adults who currently use tobacco (91.5 %) recently used at least one PMS to save money on tobacco. The top-three most common strategies among DCHA residents were saving cigarettes to finish later (35.6 %), smoking fewer cigarettes (32.2 %), and finding cheaper places to buy cigarettes (30.4 %), while among U.S. low-income adults these strategies were using coupons or promotions (62.7 %), purchasing by bulk (55.5 %), and finding cheaper places to buy tobacco products (53.6 %). People who lightly smoke in DCHA were more likely than people who heavily smoke to use PMS in general (25.0 % vs. 13.7 %) and smoke fewer cigarettes to save money (35.8 % vs. 19.2 %). US low-income people who lightly smoke were more likely than people who heavily smoke to cut back on tobacco use (61.9 % vs. 39.8 %).

Conclusion

Most U.S. low-income individuals and DCHA residents who smoke engaged in PMS. Regulating these strategies while supporting tobacco use cessation may reduce the impact of tobacco in these populations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

7.10%

发文量

409

审稿时长

41 days

期刊介绍： Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.