肌肉废用时力量发展速度快速下降的神经肌肉机制 - 综述。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Luca Ruggiero, Markus Gruber
{"title":"肌肉废用时力量发展速度快速下降的神经肌肉机制 - 综述。","authors":"Luca Ruggiero, Markus Gruber","doi":"10.1113/JP285667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The removal of skeletal muscle tension (unloading or disuse) is followed by many changes in the neuromuscular system, including muscle atrophy and loss of isometric maximal strength (measured by maximal force, F<sub>max</sub>). Explosive strength, i.e. the ability to develop the highest force in the shortest possible time, to maximise rate of force development (RFD), is a fundamental neuromuscular capability, often more functionally relevant than maximal muscle strength. In the present review, we discuss data from studies that looked at the effect of muscle unloading on isometric maximal versus explosive strength. We present evidence that muscle unloading yields a greater decline in explosive relative to maximal strength. The longer the unloading duration, the smaller the difference between the decline in the two measures. Potential mechanisms that may explain the greater decline in measures of RFD relative to F<sub>max</sub> after unloading are higher recruitment thresholds and lower firing rates of motor units, slower twitch kinetics, impaired excitation-contraction coupling, and decreased tendon stiffness. Using a Hill-type force model, we showed that this ensemble of adaptations minimises the loss of force production at submaximal contraction intensities, at the expense of a disproportionately lower RFD. With regard to the high functional relevance of RFD on one hand, and the boosted detrimental effects of inactivity on RFD on the other hand, it seems crucial to implement specific exercises targeting explosive strength in populations that experience muscle disuse over a longer time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular mechanisms for the fast decline in rate of force development with muscle disuse - a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Ruggiero, Markus Gruber\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP285667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The removal of skeletal muscle tension (unloading or disuse) is followed by many changes in the neuromuscular system, including muscle atrophy and loss of isometric maximal strength (measured by maximal force, F<sub>max</sub>). Explosive strength, i.e. the ability to develop the highest force in the shortest possible time, to maximise rate of force development (RFD), is a fundamental neuromuscular capability, often more functionally relevant than maximal muscle strength. In the present review, we discuss data from studies that looked at the effect of muscle unloading on isometric maximal versus explosive strength. We present evidence that muscle unloading yields a greater decline in explosive relative to maximal strength. The longer the unloading duration, the smaller the difference between the decline in the two measures. Potential mechanisms that may explain the greater decline in measures of RFD relative to F<sub>max</sub> after unloading are higher recruitment thresholds and lower firing rates of motor units, slower twitch kinetics, impaired excitation-contraction coupling, and decreased tendon stiffness. Using a Hill-type force model, we showed that this ensemble of adaptations minimises the loss of force production at submaximal contraction intensities, at the expense of a disproportionately lower RFD. With regard to the high functional relevance of RFD on one hand, and the boosted detrimental effects of inactivity on RFD on the other hand, it seems crucial to implement specific exercises targeting explosive strength in populations that experience muscle disuse over a longer time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP285667\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP285667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨骼肌张力消除(卸载或废用)后,神经肌肉系统会发生许多变化,包括肌肉萎缩和等长最大力量的丧失(以最大力 Fmax 衡量)。爆发力,即在尽可能短的时间内产生最大力量的能力,以最大限度地提高发力速率(RFD),是一种基本的神经肌肉能力,通常比最大肌力更具功能相关性。在本综述中,我们讨论了肌肉卸载对等长最大肌力和爆发力影响的研究数据。我们提出的证据表明,肌肉卸载导致爆发力相对于最大力量的下降幅度更大。卸载持续时间越长,两项指标的下降差异就越小。可以解释卸载后相对于最大力量的 RFD 下降幅度更大的潜在机制是:运动单位的募集阈值更高、发射率更低、抽动动力学更慢、兴奋-收缩耦合受损以及肌腱硬度下降。我们使用希尔式力量模型表明,这种适应性组合能最大限度地减少亚极限收缩强度下的力量损失,但其代价是不成比例地降低 RFD。一方面,RFD 具有很高的功能相关性,另一方面,不运动会增加 RFD 的不利影响,因此,在肌肉长期失用的人群中开展以爆发力为目标的特定练习似乎至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuromuscular mechanisms for the fast decline in rate of force development with muscle disuse - a narrative review.

The removal of skeletal muscle tension (unloading or disuse) is followed by many changes in the neuromuscular system, including muscle atrophy and loss of isometric maximal strength (measured by maximal force, Fmax). Explosive strength, i.e. the ability to develop the highest force in the shortest possible time, to maximise rate of force development (RFD), is a fundamental neuromuscular capability, often more functionally relevant than maximal muscle strength. In the present review, we discuss data from studies that looked at the effect of muscle unloading on isometric maximal versus explosive strength. We present evidence that muscle unloading yields a greater decline in explosive relative to maximal strength. The longer the unloading duration, the smaller the difference between the decline in the two measures. Potential mechanisms that may explain the greater decline in measures of RFD relative to Fmax after unloading are higher recruitment thresholds and lower firing rates of motor units, slower twitch kinetics, impaired excitation-contraction coupling, and decreased tendon stiffness. Using a Hill-type force model, we showed that this ensemble of adaptations minimises the loss of force production at submaximal contraction intensities, at the expense of a disproportionately lower RFD. With regard to the high functional relevance of RFD on one hand, and the boosted detrimental effects of inactivity on RFD on the other hand, it seems crucial to implement specific exercises targeting explosive strength in populations that experience muscle disuse over a longer time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信