微创食管切除术的临床实施。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer
{"title":"微创食管切除术的临床实施。","authors":"Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Heinz Wykypiel, Philipp Gehwolf, Katrin Kienzl-Wagner, Valeria Wagner, Andreas Puecher, Thomas Schmid, Fergül Cakar-Beck, Aline Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微创手术正成为全球食管癌切除术的首选方法:微创手术正成为全球食管癌切除术的首选方法:对一家三级医疗中心前瞻性收集的临床数据进行回顾性分析,并详细描述该计划的过程:2010年至2023年期间,共进行了136例经胸食管切除术。研究组包括 116 例手术,其中 69 例为全微创手术,47 例为混合手术。研究组中 80.0% 的手术采用了多模式方法。中位手术时间为431分钟(± 103)。R0切除率为100%。42名患者(36.2%)无术后并发症。术后 Clavien-Dindo > IIIb 级发病率为 27%。术后90天死亡率为1.7%。最后四分之一癌症患者切除的淋巴结平均数量为31个。再次手术的吻合口不全率为4%(Ivor-Lewis为4.2%,McKeown为5%):凭借在高端微创腹腔和胸腔手术方面的丰富经验,实施微创食管切除术是可行的,其临床和肿瘤结果也在普遍接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program.

Results: A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%).

Conclusions: With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信