外伤性肩关节过度活动的成像模式:范围界定综述。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dion Diep, Mohamed R Gemae, Jordan Farag, Matthew Rong Jie Tay, Rakesh Mohankumar, Nimish Mittal
{"title":"外伤性肩关节过度活动的成像模式:范围界定综述。","authors":"Dion Diep, Mohamed R Gemae, Jordan Farag, Matthew Rong Jie Tay, Rakesh Mohankumar, Nimish Mittal","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04816-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective measures from imaging studies have the potential to assist in timely diagnosis of atraumatic shoulder hypermobility to better guide management. The aim of this scoping review is to examine imaging modalities and techniques used to characterize atraumatic shoulder hypermobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2024 for any primary study investigating imaging findings seen in atraumatic shoulder hypermobility. Patients with unilateral instability were excluded given its frequent association with traumatic origin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen observational studies met inclusion criteria. Results were divided into outcomes relating to capsular redundancy, glenohumeral anatomy, and muscle activation. Five studies using magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) demonstrated statistically significant increases in capsular cross-sectional area (CSA), while a significant superior capsular elongation was reported by two studies in patients with multidirectional instability (MDI). Labrocapsular distance, glenocapsular ratio, and the presence of a combined sail and triangle sign on MRA were highly sensitive and specific parameters for identifying MDI. There were inconsistent findings for alterations of glenohumeral anatomy. Ultrasound assessments of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were significantly increased in patients with MDI, but not in shoulders with hypermobility alone. Similarly, muscle activity measured by electromyography or glenohumeral translations differed significantly in patients with MDI, but not in those with hypermobility alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiographic markers of capsular redundancy (e.g., CSA, labrocapsular distance, glenocapsular ratio), AHD, and muscular activity are useful in the diagnosis of MDI. However, there are no definitive imaging markers for diagnosing atraumatic shoulder hypermobility without MDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging modalities for atraumatic shoulder hypermobility: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Dion Diep, Mohamed R Gemae, Jordan Farag, Matthew Rong Jie Tay, Rakesh Mohankumar, Nimish Mittal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00256-024-04816-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective measures from imaging studies have the potential to assist in timely diagnosis of atraumatic shoulder hypermobility to better guide management. The aim of this scoping review is to examine imaging modalities and techniques used to characterize atraumatic shoulder hypermobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2024 for any primary study investigating imaging findings seen in atraumatic shoulder hypermobility. Patients with unilateral instability were excluded given its frequent association with traumatic origin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen observational studies met inclusion criteria. Results were divided into outcomes relating to capsular redundancy, glenohumeral anatomy, and muscle activation. Five studies using magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) demonstrated statistically significant increases in capsular cross-sectional area (CSA), while a significant superior capsular elongation was reported by two studies in patients with multidirectional instability (MDI). Labrocapsular distance, glenocapsular ratio, and the presence of a combined sail and triangle sign on MRA were highly sensitive and specific parameters for identifying MDI. There were inconsistent findings for alterations of glenohumeral anatomy. Ultrasound assessments of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were significantly increased in patients with MDI, but not in shoulders with hypermobility alone. Similarly, muscle activity measured by electromyography or glenohumeral translations differed significantly in patients with MDI, but not in those with hypermobility alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiographic markers of capsular redundancy (e.g., CSA, labrocapsular distance, glenocapsular ratio), AHD, and muscular activity are useful in the diagnosis of MDI. However, there are no definitive imaging markers for diagnosing atraumatic shoulder hypermobility without MDI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04816-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04816-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:影像学研究的客观指标可帮助及时诊断创伤性肩关节过度活动症,从而更好地指导治疗。本范围综述旨在研究用于描述创伤性肩关节过度活动的影像学模式和技术:方法:检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、Cochrane Library和Web of Science截至2024年5月的资料,以查找任何调查创伤性肩关节过度活动症成像结果的主要研究。鉴于单侧肩关节不稳常常与外伤有关,因此排除了单侧肩关节不稳患者:18项观察性研究符合纳入标准。研究结果分为与肩关节囊冗余、盂肱关节解剖和肌肉激活相关的结果。五项使用磁共振关节造影术(MRA)的研究表明,腕关节囊横截面积(CSA)的增加具有统计学意义,而两项针对多向不稳定性(MDI)患者的研究则报告了显著的腕关节囊上部伸长。唇囊距离、盂囊比以及 MRA 上出现的帆状和三角形联合征象是鉴别 MDI 的高度敏感和特异性参数。有关盂肱解剖结构改变的研究结果并不一致。超声评估显示,MDI 患者的肩峰肱骨距离(AHD)明显增加,而单纯肩关节活动过度的患者则没有增加。同样,通过肌电图或盂肱关节平移测量的肌肉活动在MDI患者中也有显著差异,但在单纯活动过度的患者中却没有:结论:关节囊冗余的影像学标记(如 CSA、唇囊距离、盂囊比)、AHD 和肌肉活动有助于 MDI 的诊断。然而,目前还没有明确的影像学指标可用于诊断无MDI的创伤性肩关节活动度过大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imaging modalities for atraumatic shoulder hypermobility: a scoping review.

Background: Objective measures from imaging studies have the potential to assist in timely diagnosis of atraumatic shoulder hypermobility to better guide management. The aim of this scoping review is to examine imaging modalities and techniques used to characterize atraumatic shoulder hypermobility.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2024 for any primary study investigating imaging findings seen in atraumatic shoulder hypermobility. Patients with unilateral instability were excluded given its frequent association with traumatic origin.

Results: Eighteen observational studies met inclusion criteria. Results were divided into outcomes relating to capsular redundancy, glenohumeral anatomy, and muscle activation. Five studies using magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) demonstrated statistically significant increases in capsular cross-sectional area (CSA), while a significant superior capsular elongation was reported by two studies in patients with multidirectional instability (MDI). Labrocapsular distance, glenocapsular ratio, and the presence of a combined sail and triangle sign on MRA were highly sensitive and specific parameters for identifying MDI. There were inconsistent findings for alterations of glenohumeral anatomy. Ultrasound assessments of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were significantly increased in patients with MDI, but not in shoulders with hypermobility alone. Similarly, muscle activity measured by electromyography or glenohumeral translations differed significantly in patients with MDI, but not in those with hypermobility alone.

Conclusion: Radiographic markers of capsular redundancy (e.g., CSA, labrocapsular distance, glenocapsular ratio), AHD, and muscular activity are useful in the diagnosis of MDI. However, there are no definitive imaging markers for diagnosing atraumatic shoulder hypermobility without MDI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信