Pediatric contrast-enhanced chest CT on a photon-counting detector CT: radiation dose and image quality compared to energy-integrated detector CT.

Background: Photon counting detector (PCD) CT benefits from reduced noise compared with conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, which should translate to improved image quality and reduced radiation exposure for pediatric patients undergoing chest CT with IV contrast.

Objective: To determine the differences in radiation exposure and image quality of PCD CT and EID CT in pediatric chest CT with intravenous (IV) contrast.

Materials and methods: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective observational study, 20 scan pairs (20 PCD CT; 20 EID CT) for children who underwent chest CT with IV contrast on both a PCD CT (Siemens NAEOTOM Alpha) and an EID CT (Siemens SOMATOM Definition Edge or Force) within 12 months were reviewed independently by three pediatric radiologists for three subjective quality features on 5-point Likert scales: overall quality, small structure delineation, and motion artifact. Objective measures of image quality (image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio) were assessed by a single radiologist in several locations in the chest through region of interest measurement of Hounsfield units (HU) and standard deviation. Patient-related and radiation exposure parameters were collected for each scan and summarized with median and interquartile range (IQR). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to compare groups. A P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Inter-observer agreement of subjective image quality metrics was analyzed using weighted kappa.

Results: Age (14.2 years vs 13.8 years, P= 0.15), height (P= 0.13), weight (P= 0.21), and BMI (P = 0.24) did not significantly differ between groups. There were 10 male and 3 female patients. Compared to EID CT, PCD CT showed lower radiation exposure parameters including volumetric CT dose index, 1.7 mGy (IQR 1.1-2.4 mGy) vs 3.8 mGy (IQR 2.0-4.7 mGy) (P< 0.01), and size-specific dose estimate, 2.6 mGy (IQR 1.8-3.1 mGy) vs 5.0 mGy (IQR 3.3-6.2 mGy) (P< 0.01). Objective image quality of lung parenchyma was improved on the PCD CT scanner, including image noise 119.5 HU (IQR 95.4-135.7 HU) vs 143.1 HU (IQR 125.4-169.8 HU) (P < 0.01), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) -6.1 (IQR -8.4 to -4.8) vs -4.9 (IQR -5.6 to -3.8) (P= 0.01), and contrast-to-noise ratio -63.9 (-84.1 to -57.5) vs -60.5 (-76.3 to -52.5) (P = 0.01). Motion artifact was improved on the PCD CT scanner (P< 0.01). No significant differences in overall image quality or small structure delineation were identified (P= 0.06 and P= 0.31).

Conclusion: PCD CT pediatric chest CT had significantly reduced radiation exposure, improved image quality, and reduced motion artifact compared with EID CT.