75 岁及以上局部肾细胞癌患者的治疗方式和并发症风险。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Hiten D Patel, Kent T Sato, Shilajit D Kundu, Ashley E Ross, Kent T Perry
{"title":"75 岁及以上局部肾细胞癌患者的治疗方式和并发症风险。","authors":"Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Hiten D Patel, Kent T Sato, Shilajit D Kundu, Ashley E Ross, Kent T Perry","doi":"10.1002/jso.27962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Partial (PN)/radical (RN) nephrectomy is the standard treatment for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The potential risks of these procedures are concerns for the elderly. We evaluated perioperative outcomes/survival for patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized RCC who underwent PN, RN, or thermal ablation (TA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Localized RCC patients undergoing PN/RN/TA (2000-2023) were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic-regression assessed factors associated with major complications. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 278 patients (≥ 75 years) with RCC who received intervention (107RN, 101PN, and 70TA) were identified. Median age was 78 years. PN patients were younger than other cohorts (77 vs. 79, p = 0.006). Patients with cancer comorbidities underwent TA than PN/RN (93% vs. 88%/76%, respectively). Median tumor size was 4.0, 3.0, and 2.6 cm in RN, PN, and TA cohorts, respectively. RN patients had more complex masses compared to other cohorts (9 vs. 7, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were significantly greater among PN patients (p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in Clavien ≥ 3 complications. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was associated with Clavien ≥ 3 complications on multivariable analysis (p = 0.03). RN was performed at a stable rate while PN decreased in favor of TA. There was no significant difference in RCC-/non-RCC-specific survival among treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important to make informed decisions about treating RCC in the elderly to reduce morbidity/mortality. PVD could be a determining factor favoring TA for amenable tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Modalities and Risks of Complication for Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Aged 75 and Older.\",\"authors\":\"Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Hiten D Patel, Kent T Sato, Shilajit D Kundu, Ashley E Ross, Kent T Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Partial (PN)/radical (RN) nephrectomy is the standard treatment for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The potential risks of these procedures are concerns for the elderly. We evaluated perioperative outcomes/survival for patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized RCC who underwent PN, RN, or thermal ablation (TA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Localized RCC patients undergoing PN/RN/TA (2000-2023) were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic-regression assessed factors associated with major complications. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 278 patients (≥ 75 years) with RCC who received intervention (107RN, 101PN, and 70TA) were identified. Median age was 78 years. PN patients were younger than other cohorts (77 vs. 79, p = 0.006). Patients with cancer comorbidities underwent TA than PN/RN (93% vs. 88%/76%, respectively). Median tumor size was 4.0, 3.0, and 2.6 cm in RN, PN, and TA cohorts, respectively. RN patients had more complex masses compared to other cohorts (9 vs. 7, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were significantly greater among PN patients (p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in Clavien ≥ 3 complications. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was associated with Clavien ≥ 3 complications on multivariable analysis (p = 0.03). RN was performed at a stable rate while PN decreased in favor of TA. There was no significant difference in RCC-/non-RCC-specific survival among treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important to make informed decisions about treating RCC in the elderly to reduce morbidity/mortality. PVD could be a determining factor favoring TA for amenable tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27962\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:部分(PN)/根治(RN)肾切除术是局部肾细胞癌(RCC)的标准治疗方法。这些手术的潜在风险是老年人关注的问题。我们对年龄≥75岁、接受过PN、RN或热消融(TA)的局部RCC患者的围手术期结果/存活率进行了评估:回顾性研究了接受 PN/RN/TA 治疗的局部 RCC 患者(2000-2023 年)。逻辑回归评估了与主要并发症相关的因素。Kaplan-Meier估计了存活率:共确定了278名接受介入治疗(107RN、101PN和70TA)的RCC患者(≥75岁)。中位年龄为 78 岁。PN患者比其他队列的患者更年轻(77岁对79岁,P = 0.006)。合并癌症的患者接受 TA 的比例高于 PN/RN(分别为 93% 对 88%/76%)。RN、PN和TA组的中位肿瘤大小分别为4.0、3.0和2.6厘米。与其他组别相比,RN 患者的肿块更复杂(9 对 7,P 结论:RN 患者的肿块更复杂:在治疗老年人的 RCC 时,做出明智的决定以降低发病率/死亡率非常重要。PVD可能是一个决定性因素,有利于TA治疗适合的肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment Modalities and Risks of Complication for Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Aged 75 and Older.

Background and objectives: Partial (PN)/radical (RN) nephrectomy is the standard treatment for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The potential risks of these procedures are concerns for the elderly. We evaluated perioperative outcomes/survival for patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized RCC who underwent PN, RN, or thermal ablation (TA).

Methods: Localized RCC patients undergoing PN/RN/TA (2000-2023) were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic-regression assessed factors associated with major complications. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival.

Results: A total of 278 patients (≥ 75 years) with RCC who received intervention (107RN, 101PN, and 70TA) were identified. Median age was 78 years. PN patients were younger than other cohorts (77 vs. 79, p = 0.006). Patients with cancer comorbidities underwent TA than PN/RN (93% vs. 88%/76%, respectively). Median tumor size was 4.0, 3.0, and 2.6 cm in RN, PN, and TA cohorts, respectively. RN patients had more complex masses compared to other cohorts (9 vs. 7, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were significantly greater among PN patients (p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in Clavien ≥ 3 complications. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was associated with Clavien ≥ 3 complications on multivariable analysis (p = 0.03). RN was performed at a stable rate while PN decreased in favor of TA. There was no significant difference in RCC-/non-RCC-specific survival among treatment modalities.

Conclusions: It is important to make informed decisions about treating RCC in the elderly to reduce morbidity/mortality. PVD could be a determining factor favoring TA for amenable tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信