树栖运动中对称步态与非对称步态的运动学差异

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Andrew R Lammers, Sarah A Stakes
{"title":"树栖运动中对称步态与非对称步态的运动学差异","authors":"Andrew R Lammers, Sarah A Stakes","doi":"10.1002/jez.2878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quadrupedal animals traveling on arboreal supports change aspects of locomotion to avoid slipping and falls. This study compares locomotor biomechanics in two small mammals: first, the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) predominantly trots, which is a symmetrical gait. The second species, the Siberian chipmunk (Tamias sibiricus), primarily bounds or half-bounds. Trotting and bounding differ fundamentally in three aspects: location and timing of hand and foot placement; in the way that the trunk bends (trotting, mediolateral bending; bounding, flexion, and extension); and in the dynamics of the center of mass. Both species ran on a flat track and a 2 cm diameter cylindrical track, instrumented with a force plate or pole. For bounding chipmunks, the force pole was modified to measure force only on the right side. We measured speed, duty factor, and force, and calculated vertical, braking, propulsive, and net mediolateral impulses. Vertical and fore-aft impulses were different between trotting opossums and bounding chipmunks, but between trackway types, these impulses were similar within each species. The modifications used by each species to travel on arboreal supports were similar, except in one important respect. Net mediolateral impulse in opossums changed from laterally directed on the flat trackway to medial on the arboreal. But in chipmunks, these impulses on the flat track were medially-directed, and on the arboreal track, the amount of variability was substantially greater. We conclude that chipmunks-and perhaps any bounding animal-are less consistent from stride to stride in their locomotion. This inconsistency requires constant medial and lateral impulses to correct their trajectory when traveling on arboreal surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":15711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinetics of Symmetrical Versus Asymmetrical In-Phase Gaits During Arboreal Locomotion.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew R Lammers, Sarah A Stakes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jez.2878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quadrupedal animals traveling on arboreal supports change aspects of locomotion to avoid slipping and falls. This study compares locomotor biomechanics in two small mammals: first, the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) predominantly trots, which is a symmetrical gait. The second species, the Siberian chipmunk (Tamias sibiricus), primarily bounds or half-bounds. Trotting and bounding differ fundamentally in three aspects: location and timing of hand and foot placement; in the way that the trunk bends (trotting, mediolateral bending; bounding, flexion, and extension); and in the dynamics of the center of mass. Both species ran on a flat track and a 2 cm diameter cylindrical track, instrumented with a force plate or pole. For bounding chipmunks, the force pole was modified to measure force only on the right side. We measured speed, duty factor, and force, and calculated vertical, braking, propulsive, and net mediolateral impulses. Vertical and fore-aft impulses were different between trotting opossums and bounding chipmunks, but between trackway types, these impulses were similar within each species. The modifications used by each species to travel on arboreal supports were similar, except in one important respect. Net mediolateral impulse in opossums changed from laterally directed on the flat trackway to medial on the arboreal. But in chipmunks, these impulses on the flat track were medially-directed, and on the arboreal track, the amount of variability was substantially greater. We conclude that chipmunks-and perhaps any bounding animal-are less consistent from stride to stride in their locomotion. This inconsistency requires constant medial and lateral impulses to correct their trajectory when traveling on arboreal surfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.2878\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.2878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

四足动物在树栖支撑物上行进时会改变运动方式,以避免滑倒和跌倒。本研究比较了两种小型哺乳动物的运动生物力学:第一种是灰色短尾负鼠(Monodelphis domestica),主要是小跑,这是一种对称步态。第二种是西伯利亚花栗鼠(Tamias sibiricus),主要是蹦跳或半蹦跳。小跑和奔跑在三个方面存在本质区别:手脚放置的位置和时间;躯干弯曲的方式(小跑,内外侧弯曲;奔跑,弯曲和伸展);以及质量中心的动态。两种花栗鼠都在一条平直的跑道和一条直径为 2 厘米的圆柱形跑道上奔跑,跑道上安装了测力板或测力杆。对于蹦跳的花栗鼠,测力杆经过改装,只能测量右侧的力。我们测量了速度、占空比和力,并计算了垂直、制动、推进和内侧净冲力。小跑负鼠和奔跑花栗鼠的垂直和前后冲力不同,但在不同的步道类型中,每个物种的这些冲力相似。除了在一个重要方面外,每个物种在树栖支撑物上行进时所使用的改装方法都很相似。负鼠的内侧净冲力从在平坦履带上的外侧导向变为在树栖支撑物上的内侧导向。但在花栗鼠身上,这些冲动在平坦的跑道上是向内侧的,而在树栖跑道上,变化的幅度要大得多。我们得出的结论是,花栗鼠--或许还有其他任何奔跑的动物--的运动步幅不太一致。这种不一致性要求花栗鼠在树栖路面上行进时,需要持续的内侧和外侧冲动来校正它们的运动轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinetics of Symmetrical Versus Asymmetrical In-Phase Gaits During Arboreal Locomotion.

Quadrupedal animals traveling on arboreal supports change aspects of locomotion to avoid slipping and falls. This study compares locomotor biomechanics in two small mammals: first, the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) predominantly trots, which is a symmetrical gait. The second species, the Siberian chipmunk (Tamias sibiricus), primarily bounds or half-bounds. Trotting and bounding differ fundamentally in three aspects: location and timing of hand and foot placement; in the way that the trunk bends (trotting, mediolateral bending; bounding, flexion, and extension); and in the dynamics of the center of mass. Both species ran on a flat track and a 2 cm diameter cylindrical track, instrumented with a force plate or pole. For bounding chipmunks, the force pole was modified to measure force only on the right side. We measured speed, duty factor, and force, and calculated vertical, braking, propulsive, and net mediolateral impulses. Vertical and fore-aft impulses were different between trotting opossums and bounding chipmunks, but between trackway types, these impulses were similar within each species. The modifications used by each species to travel on arboreal supports were similar, except in one important respect. Net mediolateral impulse in opossums changed from laterally directed on the flat trackway to medial on the arboreal. But in chipmunks, these impulses on the flat track were medially-directed, and on the arboreal track, the amount of variability was substantially greater. We conclude that chipmunks-and perhaps any bounding animal-are less consistent from stride to stride in their locomotion. This inconsistency requires constant medial and lateral impulses to correct their trajectory when traveling on arboreal surfaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology
Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Zoology – A publishes articles at the interface between Development, Physiology, Ecology and Evolution. Contributions that help to reveal how molecular, functional and ecological variation relate to one another are particularly welcome. The Journal publishes original research in the form of rapid communications or regular research articles, as well as perspectives and reviews on topics pertaining to the scope of the Journal. Acceptable articles are limited to studies on animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信