Nyasha Makaruse, Mike R D Maslin, Ziva Shai Campbell
{"title":"早期识别潜在的职业噪声引起的听力损失:系统综述。","authors":"Nyasha Makaruse, Mike R D Maslin, Ziva Shai Campbell","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2418354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review addressed two questions: <i>1) For which audiometric test frequencies or pure tone averages are hearing threshold levels (HTLs) most susceptible to early occupational noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) before significant damage? 2) Which early flag metric best detects early hearing shifts due to noise for occupational NIHL surveillance?</i></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase from July 2021 to May 2024. Eligibility was screened by two independent reviewers using Covidence. HTL results were analysed for susceptibility to noise-induced changes, and sensitivity and specificity of early flag metrics were assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Of 175 studies retrieved, 18 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies emphasised the importance of testing at frequencies above 8 kHz, with HTLs at 12, 14, and 16 kHz frequently identified as the most noise susceptible. Conventional frequencies of 3-6 kHz were also noted as susceptible. NIOSH and OSHA metrics had low sensitivity and specificity, but modifications improved their performance to 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the need to refine current metrics and explore extended high frequencies for NIHL monitoring. Research is required to determine frequencies for warning metrics and sensitive metrics for early occupational NIHL detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early identification of potential occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Nyasha Makaruse, Mike R D Maslin, Ziva Shai Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2418354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review addressed two questions: <i>1) For which audiometric test frequencies or pure tone averages are hearing threshold levels (HTLs) most susceptible to early occupational noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) before significant damage? 2) Which early flag metric best detects early hearing shifts due to noise for occupational NIHL surveillance?</i></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase from July 2021 to May 2024. Eligibility was screened by two independent reviewers using Covidence. HTL results were analysed for susceptibility to noise-induced changes, and sensitivity and specificity of early flag metrics were assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Of 175 studies retrieved, 18 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies emphasised the importance of testing at frequencies above 8 kHz, with HTLs at 12, 14, and 16 kHz frequently identified as the most noise susceptible. Conventional frequencies of 3-6 kHz were also noted as susceptible. NIOSH and OSHA metrics had low sensitivity and specificity, but modifications improved their performance to 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the need to refine current metrics and explore extended high frequencies for NIHL monitoring. Research is required to determine frequencies for warning metrics and sensitive metrics for early occupational NIHL detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2418354\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2418354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Early identification of potential occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a systematic review.
Objective: This systematic review addressed two questions: 1) For which audiometric test frequencies or pure tone averages are hearing threshold levels (HTLs) most susceptible to early occupational noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) before significant damage? 2) Which early flag metric best detects early hearing shifts due to noise for occupational NIHL surveillance?
Design: Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase from July 2021 to May 2024. Eligibility was screened by two independent reviewers using Covidence. HTL results were analysed for susceptibility to noise-induced changes, and sensitivity and specificity of early flag metrics were assessed.
Study sample: Of 175 studies retrieved, 18 met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Ten studies emphasised the importance of testing at frequencies above 8 kHz, with HTLs at 12, 14, and 16 kHz frequently identified as the most noise susceptible. Conventional frequencies of 3-6 kHz were also noted as susceptible. NIOSH and OSHA metrics had low sensitivity and specificity, but modifications improved their performance to 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.
Conclusion: The review highlights the need to refine current metrics and explore extended high frequencies for NIHL monitoring. Research is required to determine frequencies for warning metrics and sensitive metrics for early occupational NIHL detection.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.