自体牙移植中基于 CBCT 的供体牙三维复制品的准确性。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jessica Juslin, Tuija Teerijoki-Oksa, Päivi Jääsaari, Marja Ekholm, Pekka Vallittu, Lippo Lassila, Hanna Thorén
{"title":"自体牙移植中基于 CBCT 的供体牙三维复制品的准确性。","authors":"Jessica Juslin,&nbsp;Tuija Teerijoki-Oksa,&nbsp;Päivi Jääsaari,&nbsp;Marja Ekholm,&nbsp;Pekka Vallittu,&nbsp;Lippo Lassila,&nbsp;Hanna Thorén","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the accuracy of the CBCT reconstruction model compared to the natural tooth and the accuracy of the replica tooth compared to the natural tooth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The hypothesis was that a replica tooth could be used as a surgical guide in autotransplantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three teeth were chosen and a CBCT reconstruction model was formed from each tooth. STL-data was transferred to a milling machine and replica teeth were milled from PEEK. A digitized surface model was prepared from the natural and the replica teeth by a stereophotogrammetry scanner. The surface model from the optical scan of the natural tooth was compared to the CBCT reconstruction model and the surface model of the replica tooth. The models were matched on each other, and surface-based rigid registration was performed between the surface models. Distances were calculated and visualized by MATLAB.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The CBCT reconstruction model and the natural tooth were compared. The largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (0.93 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (2.3 mm). When the natural tooth and the replica tooth were compared, the largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (1.5 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (1.9 mm).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A CBCT scan maintains sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning. The replica tooth corresponded in size and shape to the natural tooth in terms of clinically expected need of precision.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accuracy of the CBCT-Based 3-Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Juslin,&nbsp;Tuija Teerijoki-Oksa,&nbsp;Päivi Jääsaari,&nbsp;Marja Ekholm,&nbsp;Pekka Vallittu,&nbsp;Lippo Lassila,&nbsp;Hanna Thorén\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the accuracy of the CBCT reconstruction model compared to the natural tooth and the accuracy of the replica tooth compared to the natural tooth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The hypothesis was that a replica tooth could be used as a surgical guide in autotransplantation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three teeth were chosen and a CBCT reconstruction model was formed from each tooth. STL-data was transferred to a milling machine and replica teeth were milled from PEEK. A digitized surface model was prepared from the natural and the replica teeth by a stereophotogrammetry scanner. The surface model from the optical scan of the natural tooth was compared to the CBCT reconstruction model and the surface model of the replica tooth. The models were matched on each other, and surface-based rigid registration was performed between the surface models. Distances were calculated and visualized by MATLAB.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CBCT reconstruction model and the natural tooth were compared. The largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (0.93 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (2.3 mm). When the natural tooth and the replica tooth were compared, the largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (1.5 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (1.9 mm).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A CBCT scan maintains sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning. The replica tooth corresponded in size and shape to the natural tooth in terms of clinically expected need of precision.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70032\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了 CBCT 重建模型与天然牙相比的准确性,以及复制牙与天然牙相比的准确性:本研究评估了CBCT重建模型与天然牙相比的准确性,以及仿制牙与天然牙相比的准确性:方法:选取三颗牙齿,将其 CBCT 重建模型与天然牙齿进行对比,并对其准确性进行评估:方法:选取三颗牙齿,并根据每颗牙齿制作 CBCT 重建模型。将 STL 数据传输到铣床,用 PEEK 材料铣出仿制牙。用立体摄影测量扫描仪从天然牙和仿制牙上制作数字化表面模型。将天然牙齿光学扫描的表面模型与 CBCT 重建模型和仿制牙齿的表面模型进行比较。模型相互匹配,表面模型之间进行基于表面的刚性配准。结果:结果:CBCT 重建模型与天然牙齿进行了比较。最大的欧氏距离出现在前臼齿的根尖(0.93 毫米)和臼齿的沟区(2.3 毫米)。将天然牙和复制牙进行比较,发现前磨牙根尖(1.5 毫米)和臼齿沟区(1.9 毫米)的欧氏距离最大:结论:CBCT 扫描为牙齿自动移植规划提供了足够的图像质量。就临床预期的精度要求而言,复制牙齿的大小和形状与天然牙齿一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Accuracy of the CBCT-Based 3-Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation

The Accuracy of the CBCT-Based 3-Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation

Background

This study evaluated the accuracy of the CBCT reconstruction model compared to the natural tooth and the accuracy of the replica tooth compared to the natural tooth.

Objective

The hypothesis was that a replica tooth could be used as a surgical guide in autotransplantation.

Methods

Three teeth were chosen and a CBCT reconstruction model was formed from each tooth. STL-data was transferred to a milling machine and replica teeth were milled from PEEK. A digitized surface model was prepared from the natural and the replica teeth by a stereophotogrammetry scanner. The surface model from the optical scan of the natural tooth was compared to the CBCT reconstruction model and the surface model of the replica tooth. The models were matched on each other, and surface-based rigid registration was performed between the surface models. Distances were calculated and visualized by MATLAB.

Results

The CBCT reconstruction model and the natural tooth were compared. The largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (0.93 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (2.3 mm). When the natural tooth and the replica tooth were compared, the largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (1.5 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (1.9 mm).

Conclusion

A CBCT scan maintains sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning. The replica tooth corresponded in size and shape to the natural tooth in terms of clinically expected need of precision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信