Anderson X B Velasquez, Giselle B Klautau, Mariana Neri L Kurihara, Ingrid Nayara M Santos, Laura B Campos, Mayara Muniz Silva, Icaro S Oliveira, Thomas Stravinskas Durigon, Lais S Seriacopi, Mauro J Salles
{"title":"通过在 Bactec 血液培养瓶中培养超声液,改进骨折相关感染和人工关节感染的微生物诊断。","authors":"Anderson X B Velasquez, Giselle B Klautau, Mariana Neri L Kurihara, Ingrid Nayara M Santos, Laura B Campos, Mayara Muniz Silva, Icaro S Oliveira, Thomas Stravinskas Durigon, Lais S Seriacopi, Mauro J Salles","doi":"10.1007/s42770-024-01545-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sonication of surgically removed implants appears to optimize the microbiological diagnosis in orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI). However, reports of infection with negative cultures can still reach high rates. A study evaluating the inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles (SFBCB) in patients with fracture-related infection (FRI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is necessary. This study compared the accuracy SFBCB over the conventional sonication fluid cultures (CSFC) and tissue culture (TC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent implant removal surgeries due to any reason had their implants sonicated according to standardized method. Definitions of PJI and FRI were based upon criteria by European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and Metsemakers, respectively. Between three to five intraoperative tissue samples were processed. The implant`s sonication fluid was seeded onto sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth and on tryptic soy broth for CSFC, while was also inoculated into blood culture bottles and incubated in the automated system during 5 days for SFBCB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 74 patients were analyzed, of which 57 with OIAI (48 FRI and 09 PJI) and 17 aseptic failures (03 arthroplasties and 14 osteosynthesis). Interestingly, SFBCB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to CSFC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100] vs. 78.9% [95% CI, 66-89], p = 0.004), and to TC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100], vs. 57.9% [95% CI, 44-71], p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences in specificity between the three methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to CSFC and TC, SFBCB improved sensitivity for diagnosing OIAI without compromising specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9090,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the microbiological diagnosis of fracture-related infection and prosthetic joint infection through culturing sonication fluid in Bactec blood culture bottles.\",\"authors\":\"Anderson X B Velasquez, Giselle B Klautau, Mariana Neri L Kurihara, Ingrid Nayara M Santos, Laura B Campos, Mayara Muniz Silva, Icaro S Oliveira, Thomas Stravinskas Durigon, Lais S Seriacopi, Mauro J Salles\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42770-024-01545-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sonication of surgically removed implants appears to optimize the microbiological diagnosis in orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI). However, reports of infection with negative cultures can still reach high rates. A study evaluating the inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles (SFBCB) in patients with fracture-related infection (FRI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is necessary. This study compared the accuracy SFBCB over the conventional sonication fluid cultures (CSFC) and tissue culture (TC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent implant removal surgeries due to any reason had their implants sonicated according to standardized method. Definitions of PJI and FRI were based upon criteria by European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and Metsemakers, respectively. Between three to five intraoperative tissue samples were processed. The implant`s sonication fluid was seeded onto sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth and on tryptic soy broth for CSFC, while was also inoculated into blood culture bottles and incubated in the automated system during 5 days for SFBCB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 74 patients were analyzed, of which 57 with OIAI (48 FRI and 09 PJI) and 17 aseptic failures (03 arthroplasties and 14 osteosynthesis). Interestingly, SFBCB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to CSFC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100] vs. 78.9% [95% CI, 66-89], p = 0.004), and to TC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100], vs. 57.9% [95% CI, 44-71], p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences in specificity between the three methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to CSFC and TC, SFBCB improved sensitivity for diagnosing OIAI without compromising specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01545-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01545-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the microbiological diagnosis of fracture-related infection and prosthetic joint infection through culturing sonication fluid in Bactec blood culture bottles.
Background: Sonication of surgically removed implants appears to optimize the microbiological diagnosis in orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI). However, reports of infection with negative cultures can still reach high rates. A study evaluating the inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles (SFBCB) in patients with fracture-related infection (FRI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is necessary. This study compared the accuracy SFBCB over the conventional sonication fluid cultures (CSFC) and tissue culture (TC).
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent implant removal surgeries due to any reason had their implants sonicated according to standardized method. Definitions of PJI and FRI were based upon criteria by European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and Metsemakers, respectively. Between three to five intraoperative tissue samples were processed. The implant`s sonication fluid was seeded onto sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth and on tryptic soy broth for CSFC, while was also inoculated into blood culture bottles and incubated in the automated system during 5 days for SFBCB.
Results: Overall, 74 patients were analyzed, of which 57 with OIAI (48 FRI and 09 PJI) and 17 aseptic failures (03 arthroplasties and 14 osteosynthesis). Interestingly, SFBCB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to CSFC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100] vs. 78.9% [95% CI, 66-89], p = 0.004), and to TC (96.5% [95% CI, 88-100], vs. 57.9% [95% CI, 44-71], p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences in specificity between the three methods.
Conclusion: In comparison to CSFC and TC, SFBCB improved sensitivity for diagnosing OIAI without compromising specificity.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Microbiology is an international peer reviewed journal that covers a wide-range of research on fundamental and applied aspects of microbiology.
The journal considers for publication original research articles, short communications, reviews, and letters to the editor, that may be submitted to the following sections: Biotechnology and Industrial Microbiology, Food Microbiology, Bacterial and Fungal Pathogenesis, Clinical Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology, Veterinary Microbiology, Fungal and Bacterial Physiology, Bacterial, Fungal and Virus Molecular Biology, Education in Microbiology. For more details on each section, please check out the instructions for authors.
The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Microbiology and currently publishes 4 issues per year.