大流行期间初产妇体重指数、巨大儿和剖腹产的趋势:墨尔本 12 家公立医院的多中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Andrew J Goldsack, Melvin B Marzan, Daniel L Rolnik, Anthea C Lindquist, Joanne M Said, Kirsten R Palmer, Penelope M Sheehan, Stephanie Potenza, Natasha Pritchard, Clare L Whitehead, Jolyon Ford, Ben W Mol, Susan P Walker, Lisa Hui
{"title":"大流行期间初产妇体重指数、巨大儿和剖腹产的趋势:墨尔本 12 家公立医院的多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Andrew J Goldsack, Melvin B Marzan, Daniel L Rolnik, Anthea C Lindquist, Joanne M Said, Kirsten R Palmer, Penelope M Sheehan, Stephanie Potenza, Natasha Pritchard, Clare L Whitehead, Jolyon Ford, Ben W Mol, Susan P Walker, Lisa Hui","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06908-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare specific perinatal outcomes in nulliparas with a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at term, with and without exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic during pregnancy. We hypothesised that the pandemic conditions in Melbourne may have been an independent contributor to trends in maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, macrosomia and caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-centre retrospective cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Singleton infants ≥ 20 weeks gestational age born between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, macrosomia (birthweight ≥ 4000 g) and caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 897 individuals gave birth for the first time to a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at term in the pre-pandemic cohort, and 25 298 in the pandemic-exposed cohort. Interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated no significant additional effect of the pandemic on pre-existing upward trends in maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, caesarean section or macrosomia. The rate of maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort compared with the pre-pandemic cohort, (45.82% vs. 44.58% respectively, p = 0.041) as was the overall rate of caesarean section (33.09% vs. 30.80%, p < 0.001). However, this increase in caesarean section was confined to individuals who had either an induction of labour or no labour. There was also a nonsignificant trend to higher rates of macrosomia in the pandemic-exposed cohort compared with the pre-pandemic cohort (8.55% vs. 7.99% respectively, p = 0.124).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While rates of Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, pre-labour caesarean section, and caesarean section following induction of labour were higher among pandemic-exposed nulliparas, these findings represented a continuation of pre-existing upward trends, with no significant independent contribution from the pandemic. These trends are forecast to continue, with long term implications for population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in maternal body mass index, macrosomia and caesarean section in first-time mothers during the pandemic: a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 12 Melbourne public hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J Goldsack, Melvin B Marzan, Daniel L Rolnik, Anthea C Lindquist, Joanne M Said, Kirsten R Palmer, Penelope M Sheehan, Stephanie Potenza, Natasha Pritchard, Clare L Whitehead, Jolyon Ford, Ben W Mol, Susan P Walker, Lisa Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06908-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare specific perinatal outcomes in nulliparas with a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at term, with and without exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic during pregnancy. We hypothesised that the pandemic conditions in Melbourne may have been an independent contributor to trends in maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, macrosomia and caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-centre retrospective cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Singleton infants ≥ 20 weeks gestational age born between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, macrosomia (birthweight ≥ 4000 g) and caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 897 individuals gave birth for the first time to a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at term in the pre-pandemic cohort, and 25 298 in the pandemic-exposed cohort. Interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated no significant additional effect of the pandemic on pre-existing upward trends in maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, caesarean section or macrosomia. The rate of maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort compared with the pre-pandemic cohort, (45.82% vs. 44.58% respectively, p = 0.041) as was the overall rate of caesarean section (33.09% vs. 30.80%, p < 0.001). However, this increase in caesarean section was confined to individuals who had either an induction of labour or no labour. There was also a nonsignificant trend to higher rates of macrosomia in the pandemic-exposed cohort compared with the pre-pandemic cohort (8.55% vs. 7.99% respectively, p = 0.124).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While rates of Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, pre-labour caesarean section, and caesarean section following induction of labour were higher among pandemic-exposed nulliparas, these findings represented a continuation of pre-existing upward trends, with no significant independent contribution from the pandemic. These trends are forecast to continue, with long term implications for population health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06908-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06908-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较在妊娠期间接触过和未接触过 COVID-19 大流行的头足月单胎产妇的特定围产期结局。我们假设,墨尔本的大流行条件可能是导致孕产妇体重指数≥25 kg/m2、巨大儿和剖腹产趋势的一个独立因素:设计:多中心回顾性队列研究和间断时间序列分析:地点:维多利亚州墨尔本市:主要结果测量指标:主要结果测量指标:产妇体重指数≥25 kg/m2、巨大儿(出生体重≥4000 g)和剖腹产率。结果:大流行前队列中有25 897人首次分娩头足月单胎婴儿,大流行暴露队列中有25 298人首次分娩头足月单胎婴儿。间断时间序列分析表明,大流行对孕产妇体重指数≥ 25 kg/m2、剖腹产或巨大儿的上升趋势没有明显的额外影响。与大流行前队列相比,大流行暴露队列中孕产妇体重指数≥25 kg/m2 的比率更高(分别为 45.82% 对 44.58%,p = 0.041),剖腹产的总体比率也更高(33.09% 对 30.80%,p 结论:大流行暴露队列中孕产妇体重指数≥25 kg/m2 的比率更高(分别为 45.82% 对 44.58%,p = 0.041),剖腹产的总体比率也更高(33.09% 对 30.80%,p = 0.041):虽然体质指数≥ 25 kg/m2、产前剖腹产率和引产后剖腹产率在受大流行影响的非妊娠妇女中较高,但这些结果代表了先前存在的上升趋势的延续,大流行并没有造成显著的独立影响。预计这些趋势将持续下去,并对人口健康产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in maternal body mass index, macrosomia and caesarean section in first-time mothers during the pandemic: a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 12 Melbourne public hospitals.

Objective: To compare specific perinatal outcomes in nulliparas with a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at term, with and without exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic during pregnancy. We hypothesised that the pandemic conditions in Melbourne may have been an independent contributor to trends in maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2, macrosomia and caesarean section.

Design: Multi-centre retrospective cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis.

Setting: Metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria.

Population: Singleton infants ≥ 20 weeks gestational age born between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2022.

Main outcome measures: Rates of maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2, macrosomia (birthweight ≥ 4000 g) and caesarean section.

Results: 25 897 individuals gave birth for the first time to a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at term in the pre-pandemic cohort, and 25 298 in the pandemic-exposed cohort. Interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated no significant additional effect of the pandemic on pre-existing upward trends in maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2, caesarean section or macrosomia. The rate of maternal Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2 was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort compared with the pre-pandemic cohort, (45.82% vs. 44.58% respectively, p = 0.041) as was the overall rate of caesarean section (33.09% vs. 30.80%, p < 0.001). However, this increase in caesarean section was confined to individuals who had either an induction of labour or no labour. There was also a nonsignificant trend to higher rates of macrosomia in the pandemic-exposed cohort compared with the pre-pandemic cohort (8.55% vs. 7.99% respectively, p = 0.124).

Conclusions: While rates of Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2, pre-labour caesarean section, and caesarean section following induction of labour were higher among pandemic-exposed nulliparas, these findings represented a continuation of pre-existing upward trends, with no significant independent contribution from the pandemic. These trends are forecast to continue, with long term implications for population health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信