经皮椎体成形术和经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果:单中心倾向评分匹配研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Danyu Cai, Biao Zhang, Jun Li, Pao Wang, Xian Tao
{"title":"经皮椎体成形术和经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果:单中心倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Danyu Cai, Biao Zhang, Jun Li, Pao Wang, Xian Tao","doi":"10.62713/aic.3634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in managing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 268 elderly OVCF individuals, and 144 individuals were selected after propensity score matching. General patient information, perioperative conditions, vertebral height and Cobb angle, lumbar spinal function, degree of pain, incidence of complications, and fracture recurrence rates were compared and analyzed for the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PKP group exhibited longer surgical duration, greater intraoperative blood loss, and more frequent X-ray fluoroscopy during the perioperative period compared to the PVP group (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. Furthermore, PKP surgery significantly improved vertebral height, corrected spinal posture, and enhanced lumbar spinal function while mitigating pain levels within the 12-month postoperative period (p < 0.05). Additionally, the PKP group showed substantially lower rates of bone cement leakage, nerve injury, and fracture recurrence than the PVP group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to PVP, PKP demonstrates better clinical effectiveness with lower incidence of complications in managing OVCF. However, surgical time and intraoperative trauma should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 5","pages":"848-858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effect of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Managing Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Single-Center Propensity Score-Matched Study.\",\"authors\":\"Danyu Cai, Biao Zhang, Jun Li, Pao Wang, Xian Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in managing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 268 elderly OVCF individuals, and 144 individuals were selected after propensity score matching. General patient information, perioperative conditions, vertebral height and Cobb angle, lumbar spinal function, degree of pain, incidence of complications, and fracture recurrence rates were compared and analyzed for the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PKP group exhibited longer surgical duration, greater intraoperative blood loss, and more frequent X-ray fluoroscopy during the perioperative period compared to the PVP group (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. Furthermore, PKP surgery significantly improved vertebral height, corrected spinal posture, and enhanced lumbar spinal function while mitigating pain levels within the 12-month postoperative period (p < 0.05). Additionally, the PKP group showed substantially lower rates of bone cement leakage, nerve injury, and fracture recurrence than the PVP group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to PVP, PKP demonstrates better clinical effectiveness with lower incidence of complications in managing OVCF. However, surgical time and intraoperative trauma should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"95 5\",\"pages\":\"848-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3634\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)的临床效果:这项回顾性研究纳入了 268 名老年 OVCF 患者,经过倾向性评分匹配后筛选出 144 人。对患者的一般信息、围手术期情况、椎体高度和 Cobb 角、腰椎功能、疼痛程度、并发症发生率和骨折复发率进行了比较和分析:与 PVP 组相比,PKP 组的手术时间更长,术中失血量更多,围手术期的 X 光透视次数更频繁(P < 0.05)。不过,两组患者的住院时间没有明显差异。此外,在术后 12 个月内,PKP 手术明显改善了椎体高度,矫正了脊柱姿势,增强了腰椎功能,同时减轻了疼痛程度(P < 0.05)。此外,PKP 组的骨水泥渗漏率、神经损伤率和骨折复发率均大大低于 PVP 组(P < 0.05):结论:与 PVP 相比,PKP 在治疗 OVCF 方面临床效果更好,并发症发生率更低。结论:与 PVP 相比,PKP 治疗 OVCF 的临床效果更好,并发症发生率更低,但应考虑手术时间和术中创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Effect of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Managing Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Single-Center Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in managing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Methods: This retrospective study included 268 elderly OVCF individuals, and 144 individuals were selected after propensity score matching. General patient information, perioperative conditions, vertebral height and Cobb angle, lumbar spinal function, degree of pain, incidence of complications, and fracture recurrence rates were compared and analyzed for the patients.

Results: The PKP group exhibited longer surgical duration, greater intraoperative blood loss, and more frequent X-ray fluoroscopy during the perioperative period compared to the PVP group (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. Furthermore, PKP surgery significantly improved vertebral height, corrected spinal posture, and enhanced lumbar spinal function while mitigating pain levels within the 12-month postoperative period (p < 0.05). Additionally, the PKP group showed substantially lower rates of bone cement leakage, nerve injury, and fracture recurrence than the PVP group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to PVP, PKP demonstrates better clinical effectiveness with lower incidence of complications in managing OVCF. However, surgical time and intraoperative trauma should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信