使用松果作为天然凝结剂的生物凝结优化与建模:罐式试验和中试应用

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ouiem Baatache, Kerroum Derbal, Abderrezzaq Benalia, Amel Khalfaoui, Antonio Pizzi
{"title":"使用松果作为天然凝结剂的生物凝结优化与建模:罐式试验和中试应用","authors":"Ouiem Baatache,&nbsp;Kerroum Derbal,&nbsp;Abderrezzaq Benalia,&nbsp;Amel Khalfaoui,&nbsp;Antonio Pizzi","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07521-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural coagulants are emerging as effective alternatives to inorganic coagulants in wastewater treatment due to their high coagulation-flocculation activity, abundance, cost-effectiveness, and biodegradability. Despite their potential, research has largely been limited to laboratory-scale experiments, with few studies exploring pilot-scale applications. This study investigates <i>pine cones</i>, a novel and underutilized waste material, as a bio-coagulant for wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). The active coagulating agent was extracted from <i>pine cones</i> treated with a 0.5 M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. Characterization was performed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and chemical analysis, revealing significant quantities of coagulating agents responsible for effective coagulation. A jar test was initially conducted to determine the optimal coagulant dosage, initial pH, and settling time for the coagulation-flocculation process. The process was modeled and optimized for turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and phosphate removal using response surface methodology (RSM) with a Box Behnken design (BBD). The optimal conditions identified were a 10 ml/L coagulant dosage at pH 10 and a settling time of 115 min. Experimental data and model predictions showed good agreement, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 99.12%, 93.52%, and 98.11% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate removal, respectively. Jar tests under these conditions achieved removal efficiencies of 98.81%, 72.02%, and 86.44% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate. The optimized conditions were then applied on a pilot scale, showing removal efficiencies of 97.77%, 71.35%, and 88.6% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate. Our findings highlight <i>pine cones</i> as an effective, cost-efficient, and eco-friendly alternative for WTPs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"235 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization and Modeling of Bio-coagulation Using Pine Cone as a Natural Coagulant: Jar Test and Pilot-Scale Applications\",\"authors\":\"Ouiem Baatache,&nbsp;Kerroum Derbal,&nbsp;Abderrezzaq Benalia,&nbsp;Amel Khalfaoui,&nbsp;Antonio Pizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07521-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Natural coagulants are emerging as effective alternatives to inorganic coagulants in wastewater treatment due to their high coagulation-flocculation activity, abundance, cost-effectiveness, and biodegradability. Despite their potential, research has largely been limited to laboratory-scale experiments, with few studies exploring pilot-scale applications. This study investigates <i>pine cones</i>, a novel and underutilized waste material, as a bio-coagulant for wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). The active coagulating agent was extracted from <i>pine cones</i> treated with a 0.5 M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. Characterization was performed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and chemical analysis, revealing significant quantities of coagulating agents responsible for effective coagulation. A jar test was initially conducted to determine the optimal coagulant dosage, initial pH, and settling time for the coagulation-flocculation process. The process was modeled and optimized for turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and phosphate removal using response surface methodology (RSM) with a Box Behnken design (BBD). The optimal conditions identified were a 10 ml/L coagulant dosage at pH 10 and a settling time of 115 min. Experimental data and model predictions showed good agreement, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 99.12%, 93.52%, and 98.11% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate removal, respectively. Jar tests under these conditions achieved removal efficiencies of 98.81%, 72.02%, and 86.44% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate. The optimized conditions were then applied on a pilot scale, showing removal efficiencies of 97.77%, 71.35%, and 88.6% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate. Our findings highlight <i>pine cones</i> as an effective, cost-efficient, and eco-friendly alternative for WTPs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"235 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07521-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07521-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然混凝剂因其高混凝絮凝活性、丰富性、成本效益和生物降解性,正在成为废水处理中无机混凝剂的有效替代品。尽管这些混凝剂具有潜力,但研究主要局限于实验室规模的实验,很少有研究探索中试规模的应用。本研究调查了松果这种未得到充分利用的新型废物材料,并将其作为污水处理厂(WTPs)的生物混凝剂。活性凝固剂是从用 0.5 M 氯化钠 (NaCl) 溶液处理过的松果中提取的。利用傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和化学分析对其进行了表征,发现了大量有效凝结的凝结剂。首先进行了罐式试验,以确定混凝-絮凝过程的最佳混凝剂用量、初始 pH 值和沉淀时间。采用箱式贝肯设计 (BBD) 的响应面方法 (RSM),针对浊度、化学需氧量 (COD) 和磷酸盐去除率对该工艺进行了建模和优化。确定的最佳条件是:pH 值为 10 时,混凝剂用量为 10 毫升/升,沉淀时间为 115 分钟。实验数据和模型预测值显示出良好的一致性,浊度、化学需氧量和磷酸盐去除率的 R2 值分别为 99.12%、93.52% 和 98.11%。在这些条件下进行的 Jar 试验对浊度、COD 和磷酸盐的去除率分别为 98.81%、72.02% 和 86.44%。然后将优化条件应用于中试规模,结果显示浊度、化学需氧量和磷酸盐的去除率分别为 97.77%、71.35% 和 88.6%。我们的研究结果表明,松果是一种有效、经济、环保的水处理厂替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimization and Modeling of Bio-coagulation Using Pine Cone as a Natural Coagulant: Jar Test and Pilot-Scale Applications

Optimization and Modeling of Bio-coagulation Using Pine Cone as a Natural Coagulant: Jar Test and Pilot-Scale Applications

Natural coagulants are emerging as effective alternatives to inorganic coagulants in wastewater treatment due to their high coagulation-flocculation activity, abundance, cost-effectiveness, and biodegradability. Despite their potential, research has largely been limited to laboratory-scale experiments, with few studies exploring pilot-scale applications. This study investigates pine cones, a novel and underutilized waste material, as a bio-coagulant for wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). The active coagulating agent was extracted from pine cones treated with a 0.5 M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. Characterization was performed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and chemical analysis, revealing significant quantities of coagulating agents responsible for effective coagulation. A jar test was initially conducted to determine the optimal coagulant dosage, initial pH, and settling time for the coagulation-flocculation process. The process was modeled and optimized for turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and phosphate removal using response surface methodology (RSM) with a Box Behnken design (BBD). The optimal conditions identified were a 10 ml/L coagulant dosage at pH 10 and a settling time of 115 min. Experimental data and model predictions showed good agreement, with R2 values of 99.12%, 93.52%, and 98.11% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate removal, respectively. Jar tests under these conditions achieved removal efficiencies of 98.81%, 72.02%, and 86.44% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate. The optimized conditions were then applied on a pilot scale, showing removal efficiencies of 97.77%, 71.35%, and 88.6% for turbidity, COD, and phosphate. Our findings highlight pine cones as an effective, cost-efficient, and eco-friendly alternative for WTPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信