Efoo Bawa Nutsukpo*, Raphael Ofoe, Qiucheng Jiang, Peter Amoako Ofori, Samuel K Asiedu, Chijioke Emenike and Abbey Lord*,
{"title":"火醛酸影响葡萄的生长、产量以及叶片、果渣和果汁的化学成分","authors":"Efoo Bawa Nutsukpo*, Raphael Ofoe, Qiucheng Jiang, Peter Amoako Ofori, Samuel K Asiedu, Chijioke Emenike and Abbey Lord*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0030310.1021/acsagscitech.4c00303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In the past decade, many studies have investigated the effects of biostimulants on viticulture. However, the impact of pyroligneous acid (PA) on grape (<i>Vitis vinifera</i>) production has not yet been reported. In this study, PA at varying concentrations (0, 4, 8, and 12% PA) and application frequencies (14-, 21-, and 28-day intervals) were applied to enhance the growth, yield, and quality of grapes (cv. KWAD7-1). The results showed that the treated grapes responded differently to PA application. The 4 and 8% PA showed a nonsignificant (<i>p</i> > 0.05) increase in yield of about 0.37- and 0.18-fold, respectively, compared to the 0% PA. The 12% PA, on the other hand, reduced the yield by approximately 0.03-fold compared to the 0% PA. Carotenoid, total phenolics, flavonoid, and sugar were altered by the PA. Interestingly, the 4% PA significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) improved total carotenoids (0.34-fold), total phenolics (0.26-fold), and flavonoids (0.26-fold) compared to the 0% PA. The 4% PA applied at 21-day and 28-day intervals remarkably improved vine and leaf growth, respectively. In conclusion, the 21-day interval of PA application significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) improved fruit fresh weight, juice weight, juice volume, press weight, °Brix, pH, salinity, total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, and titratable acidity. Further study is necessary to assess how PA can influence the metabolites present in grape wine.</p>","PeriodicalId":93846,"journal":{"name":"ACS agricultural science & technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pyroligneous Acid Affects Grapevine Growth, Yield, and Chemical Composition of Leaf, Pomace, and Juice\",\"authors\":\"Efoo Bawa Nutsukpo*, Raphael Ofoe, Qiucheng Jiang, Peter Amoako Ofori, Samuel K Asiedu, Chijioke Emenike and Abbey Lord*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0030310.1021/acsagscitech.4c00303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In the past decade, many studies have investigated the effects of biostimulants on viticulture. However, the impact of pyroligneous acid (PA) on grape (<i>Vitis vinifera</i>) production has not yet been reported. In this study, PA at varying concentrations (0, 4, 8, and 12% PA) and application frequencies (14-, 21-, and 28-day intervals) were applied to enhance the growth, yield, and quality of grapes (cv. KWAD7-1). The results showed that the treated grapes responded differently to PA application. The 4 and 8% PA showed a nonsignificant (<i>p</i> > 0.05) increase in yield of about 0.37- and 0.18-fold, respectively, compared to the 0% PA. The 12% PA, on the other hand, reduced the yield by approximately 0.03-fold compared to the 0% PA. Carotenoid, total phenolics, flavonoid, and sugar were altered by the PA. Interestingly, the 4% PA significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) improved total carotenoids (0.34-fold), total phenolics (0.26-fold), and flavonoids (0.26-fold) compared to the 0% PA. The 4% PA applied at 21-day and 28-day intervals remarkably improved vine and leaf growth, respectively. In conclusion, the 21-day interval of PA application significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) improved fruit fresh weight, juice weight, juice volume, press weight, °Brix, pH, salinity, total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, and titratable acidity. Further study is necessary to assess how PA can influence the metabolites present in grape wine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS agricultural science & technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00303\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS agricultural science & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS agricultural science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去十年中,许多研究都调查了生物刺激剂对葡萄栽培的影响。然而,有关焦木质酸(PA)对葡萄(葡萄属)产量的影响尚未见报道。在这项研究中,施用了不同浓度(0、4、8 和 12%)和施用频率(14、21 和 28 天间隔)的 PA,以提高葡萄(品种 KWAD7-1)的生长、产量和质量。结果表明,施用 PA 后,处理过的葡萄有不同的反应。与 0% PA 相比,4% 和 8% PA 的产量分别增加了约 0.37 倍和 0.18 倍,但不显著(p > 0.05)。另一方面,与 0% PA 相比,12% PA 的产量降低了约 0.03 倍。类胡萝卜素、总酚类、类黄酮和糖分都受到 PA 的影响。有趣的是,与 0% PA 相比,4% PA 显著提高了类胡萝卜素总量(0.34 倍)、总酚(0.26 倍)和类黄酮(0.26 倍)(p < 0.05)。4% PA 的施用间隔为 21 天和 28 天,分别显著改善了藤蔓和叶片的生长。总之,间隔 21 天施用 PA 能显著(p < 0.05)提高果实鲜重、果汁重量、果汁量、压榨重量、糖度、pH 值、盐度、总溶解固体、电导率和可滴定酸度。有必要进一步研究 PA 如何影响葡萄酿酒中的代谢物。
Pyroligneous Acid Affects Grapevine Growth, Yield, and Chemical Composition of Leaf, Pomace, and Juice
In the past decade, many studies have investigated the effects of biostimulants on viticulture. However, the impact of pyroligneous acid (PA) on grape (Vitis vinifera) production has not yet been reported. In this study, PA at varying concentrations (0, 4, 8, and 12% PA) and application frequencies (14-, 21-, and 28-day intervals) were applied to enhance the growth, yield, and quality of grapes (cv. KWAD7-1). The results showed that the treated grapes responded differently to PA application. The 4 and 8% PA showed a nonsignificant (p > 0.05) increase in yield of about 0.37- and 0.18-fold, respectively, compared to the 0% PA. The 12% PA, on the other hand, reduced the yield by approximately 0.03-fold compared to the 0% PA. Carotenoid, total phenolics, flavonoid, and sugar were altered by the PA. Interestingly, the 4% PA significantly (p < 0.05) improved total carotenoids (0.34-fold), total phenolics (0.26-fold), and flavonoids (0.26-fold) compared to the 0% PA. The 4% PA applied at 21-day and 28-day intervals remarkably improved vine and leaf growth, respectively. In conclusion, the 21-day interval of PA application significantly (p < 0.05) improved fruit fresh weight, juice weight, juice volume, press weight, °Brix, pH, salinity, total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, and titratable acidity. Further study is necessary to assess how PA can influence the metabolites present in grape wine.