评估用于在儿科环境中鉴别诊断 SARS-CoV-2 和流感 A/B 感染的商用快速分子护理点测定。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Viruses-Basel Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.3390/v16101638
Paolo Bottino, Costanza Massarino, Christian Leli, Elisabetta Scomparin, Cristina Bara, Franca Gotta, Elisa Cornaglia, Enrico Felici, Michela Gentile, Sara Ranzan, Alessia Francese, Francesca Ugo, Serena Penpa, Annalisa Roveta, Antonio Maconi, Andrea Rocchetti
{"title":"评估用于在儿科环境中鉴别诊断 SARS-CoV-2 和流感 A/B 感染的商用快速分子护理点测定。","authors":"Paolo Bottino, Costanza Massarino, Christian Leli, Elisabetta Scomparin, Cristina Bara, Franca Gotta, Elisa Cornaglia, Enrico Felici, Michela Gentile, Sara Ranzan, Alessia Francese, Francesca Ugo, Serena Penpa, Annalisa Roveta, Antonio Maconi, Andrea Rocchetti","doi":"10.3390/v16101638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to identify SARS-CoV-2 and to differentiate it from other respiratory viral infections, especially influenza A and B, in various critical settings. Since their introduction, the use of rapid antigen tests has spread worldwide, but there is variability in their diagnostic accuracy. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0, a molecular point-of-care test (POCT) based on enzymatic isothermal amplification for the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B in a pediatric emergency setting. A cohort of pediatric patients admitted between December 2022 and February 2023 were simultaneously tested with the POCT and standard laboratory molecular assay. Our findings showed high negative agreement of the POCT assay across the different age groups for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B (more than 98.0%), while its positive agreement varied significantly for the abovementioned viral species from 50.0% to 100%. These results highlight the potential of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 POCT assay as a reliable and rapid tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B infections in symptomatic pediatric patients, although its variable positive agreement suggests a need for confirmatory RT-qPCR testing in certain clinical and epidemiological settings in order to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Commercial Rapid Molecular Point-of-Care Assay for Differential Diagnosis Between SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B Infections in a Pediatric Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Bottino, Costanza Massarino, Christian Leli, Elisabetta Scomparin, Cristina Bara, Franca Gotta, Elisa Cornaglia, Enrico Felici, Michela Gentile, Sara Ranzan, Alessia Francese, Francesca Ugo, Serena Penpa, Annalisa Roveta, Antonio Maconi, Andrea Rocchetti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v16101638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to identify SARS-CoV-2 and to differentiate it from other respiratory viral infections, especially influenza A and B, in various critical settings. Since their introduction, the use of rapid antigen tests has spread worldwide, but there is variability in their diagnostic accuracy. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0, a molecular point-of-care test (POCT) based on enzymatic isothermal amplification for the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B in a pediatric emergency setting. A cohort of pediatric patients admitted between December 2022 and February 2023 were simultaneously tested with the POCT and standard laboratory molecular assay. Our findings showed high negative agreement of the POCT assay across the different age groups for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B (more than 98.0%), while its positive agreement varied significantly for the abovementioned viral species from 50.0% to 100%. These results highlight the potential of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 POCT assay as a reliable and rapid tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B infections in symptomatic pediatric patients, although its variable positive agreement suggests a need for confirmatory RT-qPCR testing in certain clinical and epidemiological settings in order to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101638\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101638","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于 COVID-19 正在大流行,有必要在各种危急情况下识别 SARS-CoV-2 并将其与其他呼吸道病毒感染(尤其是甲型和乙型流感)区分开来。自推出以来,快速抗原检测法已在全球范围内推广使用,但其诊断准确性存在差异。在本研究中,我们评估了 ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 的临床性能,这是一种基于酶等温扩增的分子床旁检测(POCT),可用于儿科急诊环境中 SARS-CoV-2 和甲型/乙型流感的鉴别诊断。对 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 2 月期间收治的一组儿科患者同时进行了 POCT 和标准实验室分子检测。我们的研究结果表明,在不同年龄组中,POCT 检测法对 SARS-CoV-2、甲型流感和乙型流感的阴性吻合率很高(超过 98.0%),而对上述病毒种类的阳性吻合率差异很大,从 50.0% 到 100% 不等。这些结果凸显了 ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 POCT 检测作为一种可靠、快速的工具,用于排除有症状儿科患者的 SARS-CoV-2 和甲型/乙型流感感染的潜力,尽管其阳性一致性不一,这表明在某些临床和流行病学环境中需要进行 RT-qPCR 确证检测,以确保准确诊断和适当的患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a Commercial Rapid Molecular Point-of-Care Assay for Differential Diagnosis Between SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B Infections in a Pediatric Setting.

Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to identify SARS-CoV-2 and to differentiate it from other respiratory viral infections, especially influenza A and B, in various critical settings. Since their introduction, the use of rapid antigen tests has spread worldwide, but there is variability in their diagnostic accuracy. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0, a molecular point-of-care test (POCT) based on enzymatic isothermal amplification for the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B in a pediatric emergency setting. A cohort of pediatric patients admitted between December 2022 and February 2023 were simultaneously tested with the POCT and standard laboratory molecular assay. Our findings showed high negative agreement of the POCT assay across the different age groups for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B (more than 98.0%), while its positive agreement varied significantly for the abovementioned viral species from 50.0% to 100%. These results highlight the potential of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 POCT assay as a reliable and rapid tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B infections in symptomatic pediatric patients, although its variable positive agreement suggests a need for confirmatory RT-qPCR testing in certain clinical and epidemiological settings in order to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Viruses-Basel
Viruses-Basel VIROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信