正常人视网膜神经纤维层厚度的 SD-OCT ISNT 规则适用性。

Sujata Lakhtakia, Anamika Dwivedi, Aashi Jain, Dhirendra Kumar Pandey, Pooja Singh, Divya Tripathi
{"title":"正常人视网膜神经纤维层厚度的 SD-OCT ISNT 规则适用性。","authors":"Sujata Lakhtakia, Anamika Dwivedi, Aashi Jain, Dhirendra Kumar Pandey, Pooja Singh, Divya Tripathi","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2024.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The usefulness of the Inferior>Superior>Nasal>Temporal (ISNT) rule for the neuroretinal rim (NRR) has been widely used in differentiating normal eyes from glaucoma, but only a few studies have assessed whether this classical ISNT rule applies to the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL). This study aimed to determine the applicability of the ISNT rule for the peripapillary RNFL thickness in normal eyes using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and assess if variants of the ISNT rule apply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 120 eyes of 62 healthy subjects who fulfilled the study criteria. Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured by OCT scan and each eye's global, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior quadrant thickness was noted. The values obtained were analyzed to determine the percentage of eyes obeying the ISNT rule and its variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ISNT rule for RNFL thickness was applicable for normal subjects in only 53.33% of cases. Removing the nasal quadrant from analysis increased the number of eyes obeying the IST rule to 71.66%. Further exclusion of the temporal quadrant showed almost the same results (75%) for the IS rule.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ISNT rule for RNFL thickness could be validated in only 53.33% of normal individuals. Though documented as useful for NRR during ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma diagnosis, the ISNT rule did not apply to the quadrant values on RNFL on SD-OCT examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"68 3","pages":"249-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of ISNT rule to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by SD-OCT in normal subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Sujata Lakhtakia, Anamika Dwivedi, Aashi Jain, Dhirendra Kumar Pandey, Pooja Singh, Divya Tripathi\",\"doi\":\"10.22336/rjo.2024.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The usefulness of the Inferior>Superior>Nasal>Temporal (ISNT) rule for the neuroretinal rim (NRR) has been widely used in differentiating normal eyes from glaucoma, but only a few studies have assessed whether this classical ISNT rule applies to the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL). This study aimed to determine the applicability of the ISNT rule for the peripapillary RNFL thickness in normal eyes using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and assess if variants of the ISNT rule apply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 120 eyes of 62 healthy subjects who fulfilled the study criteria. Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured by OCT scan and each eye's global, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior quadrant thickness was noted. The values obtained were analyzed to determine the percentage of eyes obeying the ISNT rule and its variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ISNT rule for RNFL thickness was applicable for normal subjects in only 53.33% of cases. Removing the nasal quadrant from analysis increased the number of eyes obeying the IST rule to 71.66%. Further exclusion of the temporal quadrant showed almost the same results (75%) for the IS rule.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ISNT rule for RNFL thickness could be validated in only 53.33% of normal individuals. Though documented as useful for NRR during ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma diagnosis, the ISNT rule did not apply to the quadrant values on RNFL on SD-OCT examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"249-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2024.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2024.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下部>上部>鼻部>颞部(ISNT)规则对神经视网膜边缘(NRR)的作用已被广泛用于区分正常眼和青光眼,但只有少数研究评估了这一经典的 ISNT 规则是否适用于视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)。本研究旨在利用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)确定 ISNT 规则是否适用于正常眼的毛周 RNFL 厚度,并评估 ISNT 规则的变体是否适用:对符合研究标准的 62 名健康受试者的 120 只眼睛进行了横断面研究。通过 OCT 扫描测量了毛细血管周围的 RNFL 厚度,并记录了每只眼睛的总厚度、上象限厚度、颞象限厚度、鼻象限厚度和下象限厚度。对所得数值进行分析,以确定符合 ISNT 规则及其变体的眼睛比例:结果:RNFL 厚度的 ISNT 规则适用于正常人的比例仅为 53.33%。从分析中剔除鼻象限后,符合 IST 规则的眼球数量增加到 71.66%。进一步排除颞象限后,IS规则的结果几乎相同(75%):结论:ISNT 规则只能在 53.33% 的正常人中得到验证。虽然在青光眼诊断中,ISNT 规则在眼底镜检查中对 NRR 很有用,但它并不适用于 SD-OCT 检查中 RNFL 的象限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of ISNT rule to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by SD-OCT in normal subjects.

Aim: The usefulness of the Inferior>Superior>Nasal>Temporal (ISNT) rule for the neuroretinal rim (NRR) has been widely used in differentiating normal eyes from glaucoma, but only a few studies have assessed whether this classical ISNT rule applies to the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL). This study aimed to determine the applicability of the ISNT rule for the peripapillary RNFL thickness in normal eyes using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and assess if variants of the ISNT rule apply.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 120 eyes of 62 healthy subjects who fulfilled the study criteria. Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured by OCT scan and each eye's global, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior quadrant thickness was noted. The values obtained were analyzed to determine the percentage of eyes obeying the ISNT rule and its variants.

Results: The ISNT rule for RNFL thickness was applicable for normal subjects in only 53.33% of cases. Removing the nasal quadrant from analysis increased the number of eyes obeying the IST rule to 71.66%. Further exclusion of the temporal quadrant showed almost the same results (75%) for the IS rule.

Conclusion: The ISNT rule for RNFL thickness could be validated in only 53.33% of normal individuals. Though documented as useful for NRR during ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma diagnosis, the ISNT rule did not apply to the quadrant values on RNFL on SD-OCT examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信