咬合厚度和轴向厚度对种植体支撑的整体氧化锆牙冠断裂负荷的影响

Min-Gyung Seo, Kyung-Ho Ko, Yoon-Hyuk Huh, Chan-Jin Park, Lee-Ra Cho
{"title":"咬合厚度和轴向厚度对种植体支撑的整体氧化锆牙冠断裂负荷的影响","authors":"Min-Gyung Seo, Kyung-Ho Ko, Yoon-Hyuk Huh, Chan-Jin Park, Lee-Ra Cho","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns with implant screw holes, focusing on variations in occlusal and axial thicknesses, and to assess the interaction between these variables.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six different prostheses were designed using CAD software, varying in occlusal thickness (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm) and axial thickness (0.4 mm, 0.8 mm, 1.2 mm) based on the height and thickness differences of the titanium implant abutment. Twelve specimens per design were created by milling zirconia blocks and titanium abutments. These specimens were cemented with resin and subjected to thermomechanical aging (50 N, 200,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 seconds dwell time) using a chewing simulator. Static loading was applied using a universal testing machine at a rate of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred, and the load value (N) at the moment of the initial fracture was recorded. Fracture pattern and surface analyses were performed. Statistical analyses included two-way analysis of variance, Tukey HSD test, multiple regression analysis, and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both occlusal and axial thicknesses significantly influenced the fracture load (P < .05), with a significant interaction between them (P < .05). An occlusal thickness of 1.0 mm exhibited a significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.5 mm (P < .05). An axial thickness of 1.2 mm showed a significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.4 mm and 0.8 mm (P < .05). The difference in axial thickness between 0.8 mm and 1.2 mm had a more substantial impact on fracture load than the difference in occlusal thickness between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm (P < .05). Fractographic analysis showed that the thin axial wall exhibited twist hackles without involvement of the crown margin, whereas the thick axial wall exhibited no hackles and a more catastrophic failure involving the crown margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For monolithic zirconia crowns with implant screw holes, when sufficient occlusal thickness cannot be achieved, an axial thickness of at least 1.2 mm is recommended to ensure higher fracture resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Occlusal and Axial Thickness on the Fracture Load of Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.\",\"authors\":\"Min-Gyung Seo, Kyung-Ho Ko, Yoon-Hyuk Huh, Chan-Jin Park, Lee-Ra Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns with implant screw holes, focusing on variations in occlusal and axial thicknesses, and to assess the interaction between these variables.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six different prostheses were designed using CAD software, varying in occlusal thickness (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm) and axial thickness (0.4 mm, 0.8 mm, 1.2 mm) based on the height and thickness differences of the titanium implant abutment. Twelve specimens per design were created by milling zirconia blocks and titanium abutments. These specimens were cemented with resin and subjected to thermomechanical aging (50 N, 200,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 seconds dwell time) using a chewing simulator. Static loading was applied using a universal testing machine at a rate of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred, and the load value (N) at the moment of the initial fracture was recorded. Fracture pattern and surface analyses were performed. Statistical analyses included two-way analysis of variance, Tukey HSD test, multiple regression analysis, and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both occlusal and axial thicknesses significantly influenced the fracture load (P < .05), with a significant interaction between them (P < .05). An occlusal thickness of 1.0 mm exhibited a significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.5 mm (P < .05). An axial thickness of 1.2 mm showed a significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.4 mm and 0.8 mm (P < .05). The difference in axial thickness between 0.8 mm and 1.2 mm had a more substantial impact on fracture load than the difference in occlusal thickness between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm (P < .05). Fractographic analysis showed that the thin axial wall exhibited twist hackles without involvement of the crown margin, whereas the thick axial wall exhibited no hackles and a more catastrophic failure involving the crown margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For monolithic zirconia crowns with implant screw holes, when sufficient occlusal thickness cannot be achieved, an axial thickness of at least 1.2 mm is recommended to ensure higher fracture resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估带有种植体螺钉孔的整体氧化锆冠的断裂负荷,重点关注咬合厚度和轴向厚度的变化,并评估这些变量之间的相互作用:使用 CAD 软件设计了六种不同的修复体,根据钛种植体基台的高度和厚度差异,设计了不同的咬合厚度(0.5 毫米、1.0 毫米)和轴向厚度(0.4 毫米、0.8 毫米、1.2 毫米)。通过铣削氧化锆块和钛基台,每种设计制作了 12 个试样。这些试样用树脂粘结,并使用咀嚼模拟器进行热机械老化(50 N、200,000 次循环、5°C-55°C、30 秒停留时间)。使用万能试验机以 0.5 毫米/分钟的速度施加静态荷载,直至发生断裂,并记录初始断裂时的荷载值(牛顿)。进行断裂形态和表面分析。统计分析包括双向方差分析、Tukey HSD 检验、多元回归分析和费雪精确检验:结果:咬合厚度和轴向厚度对骨折载荷都有显著影响(P < .05),两者之间存在显著的交互作用(P < .05)。与 0.5 毫米相比,1.0 毫米的咬合厚度显示出更高的骨折载荷(P < .05)。与 0.4 毫米和 0.8 毫米相比,1.2 毫米的轴向厚度显示出明显更高的骨折负荷(P < .05)。0.8 毫米和 1.2 毫米之间的轴向厚度差异对骨折负荷的影响比 0.5 毫米和 1.0 毫米之间的咬合厚度差异更大(P < .05)。断裂分析表明,薄的轴壁表现出扭曲的裂纹,但不涉及牙冠边缘,而厚的轴壁没有裂纹,但涉及牙冠边缘的破坏更为严重:结论:对于带有种植体螺钉孔的整体氧化锆牙冠,如果无法达到足够的咬合厚度,建议轴向厚度至少为 1.2 毫米,以确保更高的抗折性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Occlusal and Axial Thickness on the Fracture Load of Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.

Purpose: To evaluate the fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns with implant screw holes, focusing on variations in occlusal and axial thicknesses, and to assess the interaction between these variables.

Materials and methods: Six different prostheses were designed using CAD software, varying in occlusal thickness (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm) and axial thickness (0.4 mm, 0.8 mm, 1.2 mm) based on the height and thickness differences of the titanium implant abutment. Twelve specimens per design were created by milling zirconia blocks and titanium abutments. These specimens were cemented with resin and subjected to thermomechanical aging (50 N, 200,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 seconds dwell time) using a chewing simulator. Static loading was applied using a universal testing machine at a rate of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred, and the load value (N) at the moment of the initial fracture was recorded. Fracture pattern and surface analyses were performed. Statistical analyses included two-way analysis of variance, Tukey HSD test, multiple regression analysis, and Fisher's exact test.

Results: Both occlusal and axial thicknesses significantly influenced the fracture load (P < .05), with a significant interaction between them (P < .05). An occlusal thickness of 1.0 mm exhibited a significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.5 mm (P < .05). An axial thickness of 1.2 mm showed a significantly higher fracture load compared to 0.4 mm and 0.8 mm (P < .05). The difference in axial thickness between 0.8 mm and 1.2 mm had a more substantial impact on fracture load than the difference in occlusal thickness between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm (P < .05). Fractographic analysis showed that the thin axial wall exhibited twist hackles without involvement of the crown margin, whereas the thick axial wall exhibited no hackles and a more catastrophic failure involving the crown margin.

Conclusion: For monolithic zirconia crowns with implant screw holes, when sufficient occlusal thickness cannot be achieved, an axial thickness of at least 1.2 mm is recommended to ensure higher fracture resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信