内科重症监护病房姑息关怀标准早期筛查的实际效果:工具变量分析

Chad H Hochberg, Rebecca A Gersten, Khyzer B Aziz, Margaret D Krasne, Li Yan, Alison E Turnbull, Daniel Brodie, Michelle Churchill, Danielle J Doberman, Theodore J Iwashyna, David N Hager
{"title":"内科重症监护病房姑息关怀标准早期筛查的实际效果:工具变量分析","authors":"Chad H Hochberg, Rebecca A Gersten, Khyzer B Aziz, Margaret D Krasne, Li Yan, Alison E Turnbull, Daniel Brodie, Michelle Churchill, Danielle J Doberman, Theodore J Iwashyna, David N Hager","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-702OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Early identification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients likely to benefit from specialist palliative care could reduce the time such patients spend in the ICU receiving care inconsistent with their goals. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the real-world effects of early screening for palliative care criteria in a medical ICU. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective cohort study in adults admitted to the ICU using a causal inference approach with instrumental variable analysis. The intervention consisted of screening ICU admissions for palliative care trigger conditions and, if present, offering specialist palliative care consultation, which could be accepted or declined by the ICU. We evaluated specialist palliative care use in pre and postimplementation cohorts from the year before and after screening implementation began (October 2022). In the postimplementation cohort, we compared use of specialist palliative care in those who received early screening versus not. We then estimated the effect of early screening on the primary outcome of days to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status or ICU discharge, with death without a DNR order placed at the 99th percentile of the days to DNR or ICU discharge distribution. Secondary outcomes included: DNR order, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, hospice discharge, and mortality metrics. To address unmeasured confounding, we used two-stage least-squares instrumental variables analysis. The instrument, which predicts early screening, comprised weekend versus weekday admission and number of patients meeting palliative care criteria on a patient's ICU Days 1 and 2. <b>Results:</b> Among 1,282 postimplementation admissions, 626 (45%) received early screening, and 398 (28%) received specialty palliative consultation. Early receipt of specialist palliative care was higher in patients who received early screening versus not (17% vs. 1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and overall use of specialty palliative care was higher after versus before screening implementation (28% vs. 15%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). In the postimplementation cohort, there were no statistically significant effects of early screening on the primary outcome of days to DNR or ICU discharge (15% relative increase; 95% confidence interval, -11% to +48%) or other secondary outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite significantly increased specialty palliative care consultation, there was no evidence that early screening for palliative care criteria affected time to DNR/ICU discharge or other secondary outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"247-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Real-World Effect of Early Screening for Palliative Care Criteria in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chad H Hochberg, Rebecca A Gersten, Khyzer B Aziz, Margaret D Krasne, Li Yan, Alison E Turnbull, Daniel Brodie, Michelle Churchill, Danielle J Doberman, Theodore J Iwashyna, David N Hager\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-702OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Early identification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients likely to benefit from specialist palliative care could reduce the time such patients spend in the ICU receiving care inconsistent with their goals. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the real-world effects of early screening for palliative care criteria in a medical ICU. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective cohort study in adults admitted to the ICU using a causal inference approach with instrumental variable analysis. The intervention consisted of screening ICU admissions for palliative care trigger conditions and, if present, offering specialist palliative care consultation, which could be accepted or declined by the ICU. We evaluated specialist palliative care use in pre and postimplementation cohorts from the year before and after screening implementation began (October 2022). In the postimplementation cohort, we compared use of specialist palliative care in those who received early screening versus not. We then estimated the effect of early screening on the primary outcome of days to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status or ICU discharge, with death without a DNR order placed at the 99th percentile of the days to DNR or ICU discharge distribution. Secondary outcomes included: DNR order, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, hospice discharge, and mortality metrics. To address unmeasured confounding, we used two-stage least-squares instrumental variables analysis. The instrument, which predicts early screening, comprised weekend versus weekday admission and number of patients meeting palliative care criteria on a patient's ICU Days 1 and 2. <b>Results:</b> Among 1,282 postimplementation admissions, 626 (45%) received early screening, and 398 (28%) received specialty palliative consultation. Early receipt of specialist palliative care was higher in patients who received early screening versus not (17% vs. 1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and overall use of specialty palliative care was higher after versus before screening implementation (28% vs. 15%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). In the postimplementation cohort, there were no statistically significant effects of early screening on the primary outcome of days to DNR or ICU discharge (15% relative increase; 95% confidence interval, -11% to +48%) or other secondary outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite significantly increased specialty palliative care consultation, there was no evidence that early screening for palliative care criteria affected time to DNR/ICU discharge or other secondary outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"247-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-702OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-702OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:及早识别出可能从专科姑息关怀中获益的重症监护病房患者,可以减少这些患者在重症监护病房接受与其目标不符的护理的时间:评估在内科重症监护病房早期筛查姑息关怀标准的实际效果:我们采用工具变量分析的因果推理方法,对入住重症监护病房的成人进行了一项回顾性队列研究。干预措施包括筛查重症监护室入院病人是否存在姑息关怀触发条件,如果存在,则提供专家姑息关怀咨询,重症监护室可接受/拒绝接受咨询。我们从筛查开始实施的前后一年(2022 年 10 月)评估了实施前和实施后队列中姑息关怀专家的使用情况。在实施后的队列中,我们比较了接受早期筛查与未接受早期筛查的患者使用专科姑息治疗的情况。然后,我们估算了早期筛查对拒绝复苏(DNR)代码状态或ICU出院天数这一主要结果的影响,其中,无DNR命令的死亡被置于拒绝复苏或ICU出院天数分布的第99百分位数。次要结果包括DNR指令、ICU/住院时间、出院安宁疗护和死亡率指标。为了解决无法测量的混杂因素,我们使用了两阶段最小二乘法工具变量分析。预测早期筛查的工具包括周末与平日的入院情况以及患者在重症监护室第 1 天和第 2 天符合姑息治疗标准的患者人数:在实施后的1282例入院患者中,有626例(45%)接受了早期筛查,398例(28%)接受了专科姑息治疗咨询。接受早期筛查的患者与未接受早期筛查的患者相比,接受专科姑息治疗的比例更高(17% vs 1% , p结论:尽管专科姑息治疗的比例显著增加,但接受早期筛查的患者与未接受早期筛查的患者相比,接受专科姑息治疗的比例更高:尽管姑息治疗专科咨询大幅增加,但没有证据表明姑息治疗标准的早期筛查会影响DNR/ICU出院时间或其他次要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Real-World Effect of Early Screening for Palliative Care Criteria in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Rationale: Early identification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients likely to benefit from specialist palliative care could reduce the time such patients spend in the ICU receiving care inconsistent with their goals. Objectives: To evaluate the real-world effects of early screening for palliative care criteria in a medical ICU. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in adults admitted to the ICU using a causal inference approach with instrumental variable analysis. The intervention consisted of screening ICU admissions for palliative care trigger conditions and, if present, offering specialist palliative care consultation, which could be accepted or declined by the ICU. We evaluated specialist palliative care use in pre and postimplementation cohorts from the year before and after screening implementation began (October 2022). In the postimplementation cohort, we compared use of specialist palliative care in those who received early screening versus not. We then estimated the effect of early screening on the primary outcome of days to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status or ICU discharge, with death without a DNR order placed at the 99th percentile of the days to DNR or ICU discharge distribution. Secondary outcomes included: DNR order, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, hospice discharge, and mortality metrics. To address unmeasured confounding, we used two-stage least-squares instrumental variables analysis. The instrument, which predicts early screening, comprised weekend versus weekday admission and number of patients meeting palliative care criteria on a patient's ICU Days 1 and 2. Results: Among 1,282 postimplementation admissions, 626 (45%) received early screening, and 398 (28%) received specialty palliative consultation. Early receipt of specialist palliative care was higher in patients who received early screening versus not (17% vs. 1%; P < 0.001), and overall use of specialty palliative care was higher after versus before screening implementation (28% vs. 15%; P < 0.001). In the postimplementation cohort, there were no statistically significant effects of early screening on the primary outcome of days to DNR or ICU discharge (15% relative increase; 95% confidence interval, -11% to +48%) or other secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Despite significantly increased specialty palliative care consultation, there was no evidence that early screening for palliative care criteria affected time to DNR/ICU discharge or other secondary outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信