哥本哈根内收运动与内收肌挤压运动对男性足球运动员力量的影响--随机对照试验。

Christos Pippas, George Gioftsos, Vasileios Korakakis, Andreas Serner
{"title":"哥本哈根内收运动与内收肌挤压运动对男性足球运动员力量的影响--随机对照试验。","authors":"Christos Pippas, George Gioftsos, Vasileios Korakakis, Andreas Serner","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2024.2419659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the effect of assigning male football players to an 8-week Copenhagen Adduction (CA) and Adductor Squeeze (SQ) Pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 57 participants (16.7 ± 0.9 years, 175.9 ± 7.3 height and 66 ± 8.4 weight) were individually randomized to an 8-week progressive dynamic training protocol with the CA or an isometric training protocol with the SQ twice per week. Maximal eccentric (EHAD) and isometric (IHAD) hip adductor torque was tested with a handheld dynamometer. Perceived exertion and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were recorded throughout the intervention period. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant between-group difference was observed for EHAD (<i>p</i> = 0.478-0.833) nor IHAD (<i>p</i> = 0.084-0.118). There was a significant difference in DOMS between groups in the third to sixteenth exercise session, with the CA group reporting higher values (median varying between 0-3 vs 0-1, <i>p</i> = 0.000-0.009). Perceived exertion was greater for the CA group only in the fifteenth exercise session of the protocol (median of 4 vs 3, <i>p</i> = 0.031). No other significant differences between the groups were observed for DOMS nor perceived exertion. An 8-week adductor training program with either the Copenhagen Adduction or Adductor Squeeze exercise performed with two sets twice a week and adjusted for total volume did not result in significant differences in eccentric nor isometric adduction torque between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strength effects of the Copenhagen adduction exercise vs an adductor squeeze exercise in male football players - A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christos Pippas, George Gioftsos, Vasileios Korakakis, Andreas Serner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24733938.2024.2419659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To examine the effect of assigning male football players to an 8-week Copenhagen Adduction (CA) and Adductor Squeeze (SQ) Pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 57 participants (16.7 ± 0.9 years, 175.9 ± 7.3 height and 66 ± 8.4 weight) were individually randomized to an 8-week progressive dynamic training protocol with the CA or an isometric training protocol with the SQ twice per week. Maximal eccentric (EHAD) and isometric (IHAD) hip adductor torque was tested with a handheld dynamometer. Perceived exertion and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were recorded throughout the intervention period. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant between-group difference was observed for EHAD (<i>p</i> = 0.478-0.833) nor IHAD (<i>p</i> = 0.084-0.118). There was a significant difference in DOMS between groups in the third to sixteenth exercise session, with the CA group reporting higher values (median varying between 0-3 vs 0-1, <i>p</i> = 0.000-0.009). Perceived exertion was greater for the CA group only in the fifteenth exercise session of the protocol (median of 4 vs 3, <i>p</i> = 0.031). No other significant differences between the groups were observed for DOMS nor perceived exertion. An 8-week adductor training program with either the Copenhagen Adduction or Adductor Squeeze exercise performed with two sets twice a week and adjusted for total volume did not result in significant differences in eccentric nor isometric adduction torque between the groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2419659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2419659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究将男性足球运动员分配到为期 8 周的哥本哈根外展(CA)和内收肌挤压(SQ)实用随机对照试验中的效果,57 名参与者(16.7 ± 0.9 岁,身高 175.9 ± 7.3,体重 66 ± 8.4)被单独随机分配到为期 8 周的渐进式动态训练方案(CA)或等长训练方案(SQ)中,每周两次。使用手持式测力计测试最大偏心(EHAD)和等长(IHAD)髋关节内收肌扭矩。在整个干预期间都记录了感觉到的消耗和延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)。在意向治疗分析中,EHAD(p = 0.478-0.833)和 IHAD(p = 0.084-0.118)的组间差异均不明显。在第三次至第十六次运动中,各组间的 DOMS 存在明显差异,CA 组的 DOMS 值更高(中位数在 0-3 与 0-1 之间,p = 0.000-0.009)。CA 组仅在方案的第 15 次锻炼中感觉到的体力消耗更大(中位数为 4 vs 3,p = 0.031)。在 DOMS 和体力消耗感知方面,各组之间未发现其他明显差异。在为期 8 周的内收肌训练计划中,无论是哥本哈根内收运动还是内收挤压运动,每周进行两次,每次两组,并根据总运动量进行调整,两组在偏心或等长内收扭矩方面均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strength effects of the Copenhagen adduction exercise vs an adductor squeeze exercise in male football players - A randomized controlled trial.

To examine the effect of assigning male football players to an 8-week Copenhagen Adduction (CA) and Adductor Squeeze (SQ) Pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 57 participants (16.7 ± 0.9 years, 175.9 ± 7.3 height and 66 ± 8.4 weight) were individually randomized to an 8-week progressive dynamic training protocol with the CA or an isometric training protocol with the SQ twice per week. Maximal eccentric (EHAD) and isometric (IHAD) hip adductor torque was tested with a handheld dynamometer. Perceived exertion and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were recorded throughout the intervention period. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant between-group difference was observed for EHAD (p = 0.478-0.833) nor IHAD (p = 0.084-0.118). There was a significant difference in DOMS between groups in the third to sixteenth exercise session, with the CA group reporting higher values (median varying between 0-3 vs 0-1, p = 0.000-0.009). Perceived exertion was greater for the CA group only in the fifteenth exercise session of the protocol (median of 4 vs 3, p = 0.031). No other significant differences between the groups were observed for DOMS nor perceived exertion. An 8-week adductor training program with either the Copenhagen Adduction or Adductor Squeeze exercise performed with two sets twice a week and adjusted for total volume did not result in significant differences in eccentric nor isometric adduction torque between the groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信