打破陈规:大学生的科学家生活经历如何影响他们的可能性范围。

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ashley Rose Acosta-Parra, Dax Ovid, Brie Tripp
{"title":"打破陈规:大学生的科学家生活经历如何影响他们的可能性范围。","authors":"Ashley Rose Acosta-Parra, Dax Ovid, Brie Tripp","doi":"10.1187/cbe.24-05-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Building on decades of scholarship critiquing scientist representation in classrooms and textbooks, the present study characterizes the lifetime experiences of undergraduate students regarding their perceptions of scientists and science identity. Informed by the theoretical framework of Cultural Learning Pathways (CLP), we conducted 31 semistructured interviews with undergraduates who completed six Scientist Spotlights (scientistspotlights.org), which are inclusive curricular supplements that feature counterstereotypical scientists. Despite decades of progress in curricular representation, our results revealed almost all students (94%, <i>n</i> = 29) recounted exposure to predominantly (if not exclusively) stereotypical scientists across social institutions (e.g., media, K12, universities, healthcare environments) throughout their lifetime, which <i>limited</i> their Scopes of Possibility to pursue science. All students (100%, <i>n</i> = 31) reported that Scientist Spotlights <i>enhanced</i> Scopes of Possibility for themselves and others from marginalized backgrounds to pursue science. Last, almost all students (97%, <i>n</i> = 30) shared characteristics they hoped to see when <i>imagining</i> Scopes of Possibility, emphasizing the need for a concerted effort to increase representation of counterstereotypical scientists across science curriculum and social institutions more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":56321,"journal":{"name":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","volume":"23 4","pages":"ar58"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking Stereotypes: How Undergraduates' Life Experiences of Scientists Shape their Scopes of Possibility.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Rose Acosta-Parra, Dax Ovid, Brie Tripp\",\"doi\":\"10.1187/cbe.24-05-0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Building on decades of scholarship critiquing scientist representation in classrooms and textbooks, the present study characterizes the lifetime experiences of undergraduate students regarding their perceptions of scientists and science identity. Informed by the theoretical framework of Cultural Learning Pathways (CLP), we conducted 31 semistructured interviews with undergraduates who completed six Scientist Spotlights (scientistspotlights.org), which are inclusive curricular supplements that feature counterstereotypical scientists. Despite decades of progress in curricular representation, our results revealed almost all students (94%, <i>n</i> = 29) recounted exposure to predominantly (if not exclusively) stereotypical scientists across social institutions (e.g., media, K12, universities, healthcare environments) throughout their lifetime, which <i>limited</i> their Scopes of Possibility to pursue science. All students (100%, <i>n</i> = 31) reported that Scientist Spotlights <i>enhanced</i> Scopes of Possibility for themselves and others from marginalized backgrounds to pursue science. Last, almost all students (97%, <i>n</i> = 30) shared characteristics they hoped to see when <i>imagining</i> Scopes of Possibility, emphasizing the need for a concerted effort to increase representation of counterstereotypical scientists across science curriculum and social institutions more broadly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cbe-Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"ar58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cbe-Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-05-0148\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-05-0148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以数十年来批判科学家在课堂和教科书中表现形式的学术研究为基础,描述了本科生一生中有关科学家和科学身份认知的经历。在 "文化学习路径"(CLP)理论框架的指导下,我们对完成了六个 "科学家聚焦"(scientistspotlights.org)课程的本科生进行了 31 次半结构式访谈,这些 "科学家聚焦 "是以反传统科学家为主题的包容性课程补充。尽管数十年来在课程代表性方面取得了进展,但我们的结果显示,几乎所有学生(94%,n = 29)都回忆了他们一生中在社会机构(如媒体、幼儿园、大学、医疗环境)中主要(如果不是完全)接触到的刻板印象科学家,这限制了他们追求科学的可能性范围。所有学生(100%,n = 31)都表示,"科学家聚焦 "活动提高了他们自己和其他来自边缘化背景的学生追求科学的可能性范围。最后,几乎所有学生(97%,n = 30)都分享了他们在想象 "可能性范围 "时希望看到的特征,强调需要共同努力,在科学课程和更广泛的社会机构中增加反传统科学家的代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking Stereotypes: How Undergraduates' Life Experiences of Scientists Shape their Scopes of Possibility.

Building on decades of scholarship critiquing scientist representation in classrooms and textbooks, the present study characterizes the lifetime experiences of undergraduate students regarding their perceptions of scientists and science identity. Informed by the theoretical framework of Cultural Learning Pathways (CLP), we conducted 31 semistructured interviews with undergraduates who completed six Scientist Spotlights (scientistspotlights.org), which are inclusive curricular supplements that feature counterstereotypical scientists. Despite decades of progress in curricular representation, our results revealed almost all students (94%, n = 29) recounted exposure to predominantly (if not exclusively) stereotypical scientists across social institutions (e.g., media, K12, universities, healthcare environments) throughout their lifetime, which limited their Scopes of Possibility to pursue science. All students (100%, n = 31) reported that Scientist Spotlights enhanced Scopes of Possibility for themselves and others from marginalized backgrounds to pursue science. Last, almost all students (97%, n = 30) shared characteristics they hoped to see when imagining Scopes of Possibility, emphasizing the need for a concerted effort to increase representation of counterstereotypical scientists across science curriculum and social institutions more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cbe-Life Sciences Education
Cbe-Life Sciences Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
13.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CBE—Life Sciences Education (LSE), a free, online quarterly journal, is published by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The journal was launched in spring 2002 as Cell Biology Education—A Journal of Life Science Education. The ASCB changed the name of the journal in spring 2006 to better reflect the breadth of its readership and the scope of its submissions. LSE publishes peer-reviewed articles on life science education at the K–12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. The ASCB believes that learning in biology encompasses diverse fields, including math, chemistry, physics, engineering, computer science, and the interdisciplinary intersections of biology with these fields. Within biology, LSE focuses on how students are introduced to the study of life sciences, as well as approaches in cell biology, developmental biology, neuroscience, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, genomics, bioinformatics, and proteomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信