自动体外除颤器和可穿戴式心脏除颤器的进步。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001189
Omar M Aldaas, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green
{"title":"自动体外除颤器和可穿戴式心脏除颤器的进步。","authors":"Omar M Aldaas, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Survival statistics for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remain unsatisfactory. Prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is crucial for improving survival. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and wearable cardiac defibrillators (WCDs) seek to improve the survival rates following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. We aim to review the indications, utility, advancements, and limitations of AEDs and WCDs, as well as their role in contemporary and future clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent advancements in these technologies, such as smartphone applications and drone delivery of AEDs and less inappropriate shocks and decreased size of WCDs, have increased their ubiquity and efficacy. However, implementation of this technology remains limited due to lack of resources and suboptimal patient adherence.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Out of hospital cardiac arrests continue to pose a significant public health challenge. Advancements in AEDs and WCDs aim to facilitate prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms with the goal of improving survival rates. However, they remain underutilized due to limited resources and suboptimal patient adherence. As these technologies continue to evolve to become smaller, lighter and more affordable, their utilization and accessibility are expected to improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in automated external and wearable cardiac defibrillators.\",\"authors\":\"Omar M Aldaas, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Survival statistics for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remain unsatisfactory. Prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is crucial for improving survival. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and wearable cardiac defibrillators (WCDs) seek to improve the survival rates following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. We aim to review the indications, utility, advancements, and limitations of AEDs and WCDs, as well as their role in contemporary and future clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent advancements in these technologies, such as smartphone applications and drone delivery of AEDs and less inappropriate shocks and decreased size of WCDs, have increased their ubiquity and efficacy. However, implementation of this technology remains limited due to lack of resources and suboptimal patient adherence.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Out of hospital cardiac arrests continue to pose a significant public health challenge. Advancements in AEDs and WCDs aim to facilitate prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms with the goal of improving survival rates. However, they remain underutilized due to limited resources and suboptimal patient adherence. As these technologies continue to evolve to become smaller, lighter and more affordable, their utilization and accessibility are expected to improve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001189\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:院外心脏骤停患者的存活率统计数据仍不尽如人意。对心室颤动和无脉性室性心动过速等可电击节律进行及时除颤对于提高存活率至关重要。自动体外除颤器(AED)和可穿戴心脏除颤器(WCD)旨在提高院外心脏骤停后的存活率。我们旨在回顾 AED 和 WCD 的适应症、实用性、先进性和局限性,以及它们在当代和未来临床实践中的作用:这些技术的最新进展,如智能手机应用和无人机投放自动体外除颤器、减少不适当的电击和减小 WCD 的尺寸,提高了它们的普及性和有效性。然而,由于资源匮乏和患者依从性不佳,这项技术的应用仍然有限。摘要:院外心脏骤停仍然是公共卫生的重大挑战。自动体外除颤器和WCD的进步旨在促进对可电击心律的及时除颤,从而提高存活率。然而,由于资源有限和患者依从性不佳,这些设备的使用率仍然很低。随着这些技术不断发展,变得更小、更轻、更经济实惠,其利用率和可及性有望得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancements in automated external and wearable cardiac defibrillators.

Purpose of review: Survival statistics for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remain unsatisfactory. Prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is crucial for improving survival. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and wearable cardiac defibrillators (WCDs) seek to improve the survival rates following out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. We aim to review the indications, utility, advancements, and limitations of AEDs and WCDs, as well as their role in contemporary and future clinical practice.

Recent findings: Recent advancements in these technologies, such as smartphone applications and drone delivery of AEDs and less inappropriate shocks and decreased size of WCDs, have increased their ubiquity and efficacy. However, implementation of this technology remains limited due to lack of resources and suboptimal patient adherence.

Summary: Out of hospital cardiac arrests continue to pose a significant public health challenge. Advancements in AEDs and WCDs aim to facilitate prompt defibrillation of shockable rhythms with the goal of improving survival rates. However, they remain underutilized due to limited resources and suboptimal patient adherence. As these technologies continue to evolve to become smaller, lighter and more affordable, their utilization and accessibility are expected to improve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信