Maria Grazia Piancino, Alessandro Tortarolo, Laura Di Benedetto, Luigi Moscufo, Ludovica Nucci, Michela Bersia
{"title":"使用功能性咬合矫治器治疗单侧后交叉咬合的稳定性:与下颌顺时针旋转减少和上颌横向宽度测量增加有关。","authors":"Maria Grazia Piancino, Alessandro Tortarolo, Laura Di Benedetto, Luigi Moscufo, Ludovica Nucci, Michela Bersia","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00556-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This observational study aimed to evaluate the stability of unilateral posterior crossbite (UPXB) correction with the functional appliance function generating bite (FGB appliance) during follow-up and its effects on craniofacial growth.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A total of 102 age- and gender-matched patients were included: 51 with UPXB (male [M] = 19; female [F] = 32; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 7.6 ± 1.4 [years.months]) and 51 controls (C; M = 19; F = 32; mean age ± SD = 7.9 ± 1.3). UPXB was corrected with the FGB appliance. Study casts were collected before treatment (T0), after correction (T1), after a follow-up of 3.7 ± 1.6 [years.months] (T2) and different transversal measurements were performed with calipers: intermolar (IMD), intermolar gingival (IMGD), intercanine (ICD), and intercanine gingival distances (ICGD). In treated patients, in addition, lateral cephalometric tracings were analyzed at T0 and T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T0, all maxillary measurements were significantly smaller in the UPXB group compared to the controls (p < 0.001). Between T0 and T1, all maxillary variables increased significantly in the UPXB group (p < 0.001; IMD +4.3 ± 2.1 mm; ICD +3.1 ± 2 mm). Between T1 and T2, maxillary IMD increased further (p < 0.05; +2.2 ± 2 mm). The mean T0-T2 increases were 6.6 ± 2.6 mm (IMD) and 4.3 ± 2.6 mm (ICD). At T0, the cephalometric analysis showed significantly stronger mandibular clockwise rotation (p < 0.01) in the UPXB group compared to the control group. Between T0 and T2, the UPXB group showed a significant reduction of mandibular (p < 0.001; SpP-CoOr T0 = -3.47°± 4.38, T2 = -1.14°± 4.01) and occlusal plane (p < 0.01; SpP-Oc T0 = 11.37°± 3.91, T2 = 9.86°± 3.83) clockwise rotation, and of intermaxillary divergence (p < 0.01; SpP-GoGn T0 = 27.8°± 5.39, T2 = 26.65°± 5.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of UPXB with the FGB appliance effectively increased maxillary transversal width measurements, especially in the posterior region, even after follow-up, indicating stable results. Concurrently, mandibular clockwise rotation was reduced, indicating control of the vertical dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of unilateral posterior crossbite treatment with the Function Generating Bite appliance : Association with reduction of mandibular clockwise rotation and increased maxillary transversal width measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Grazia Piancino, Alessandro Tortarolo, Laura Di Benedetto, Luigi Moscufo, Ludovica Nucci, Michela Bersia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00056-024-00556-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This observational study aimed to evaluate the stability of unilateral posterior crossbite (UPXB) correction with the functional appliance function generating bite (FGB appliance) during follow-up and its effects on craniofacial growth.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A total of 102 age- and gender-matched patients were included: 51 with UPXB (male [M] = 19; female [F] = 32; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 7.6 ± 1.4 [years.months]) and 51 controls (C; M = 19; F = 32; mean age ± SD = 7.9 ± 1.3). UPXB was corrected with the FGB appliance. Study casts were collected before treatment (T0), after correction (T1), after a follow-up of 3.7 ± 1.6 [years.months] (T2) and different transversal measurements were performed with calipers: intermolar (IMD), intermolar gingival (IMGD), intercanine (ICD), and intercanine gingival distances (ICGD). In treated patients, in addition, lateral cephalometric tracings were analyzed at T0 and T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T0, all maxillary measurements were significantly smaller in the UPXB group compared to the controls (p < 0.001). Between T0 and T1, all maxillary variables increased significantly in the UPXB group (p < 0.001; IMD +4.3 ± 2.1 mm; ICD +3.1 ± 2 mm). Between T1 and T2, maxillary IMD increased further (p < 0.05; +2.2 ± 2 mm). The mean T0-T2 increases were 6.6 ± 2.6 mm (IMD) and 4.3 ± 2.6 mm (ICD). At T0, the cephalometric analysis showed significantly stronger mandibular clockwise rotation (p < 0.01) in the UPXB group compared to the control group. Between T0 and T2, the UPXB group showed a significant reduction of mandibular (p < 0.001; SpP-CoOr T0 = -3.47°± 4.38, T2 = -1.14°± 4.01) and occlusal plane (p < 0.01; SpP-Oc T0 = 11.37°± 3.91, T2 = 9.86°± 3.83) clockwise rotation, and of intermaxillary divergence (p < 0.01; SpP-GoGn T0 = 27.8°± 5.39, T2 = 26.65°± 5.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of UPXB with the FGB appliance effectively increased maxillary transversal width measurements, especially in the posterior region, even after follow-up, indicating stable results. Concurrently, mandibular clockwise rotation was reduced, indicating control of the vertical dimension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00556-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00556-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stability of unilateral posterior crossbite treatment with the Function Generating Bite appliance : Association with reduction of mandibular clockwise rotation and increased maxillary transversal width measurements.
Purpose: This observational study aimed to evaluate the stability of unilateral posterior crossbite (UPXB) correction with the functional appliance function generating bite (FGB appliance) during follow-up and its effects on craniofacial growth.
Materials and method: A total of 102 age- and gender-matched patients were included: 51 with UPXB (male [M] = 19; female [F] = 32; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 7.6 ± 1.4 [years.months]) and 51 controls (C; M = 19; F = 32; mean age ± SD = 7.9 ± 1.3). UPXB was corrected with the FGB appliance. Study casts were collected before treatment (T0), after correction (T1), after a follow-up of 3.7 ± 1.6 [years.months] (T2) and different transversal measurements were performed with calipers: intermolar (IMD), intermolar gingival (IMGD), intercanine (ICD), and intercanine gingival distances (ICGD). In treated patients, in addition, lateral cephalometric tracings were analyzed at T0 and T2.
Results: At T0, all maxillary measurements were significantly smaller in the UPXB group compared to the controls (p < 0.001). Between T0 and T1, all maxillary variables increased significantly in the UPXB group (p < 0.001; IMD +4.3 ± 2.1 mm; ICD +3.1 ± 2 mm). Between T1 and T2, maxillary IMD increased further (p < 0.05; +2.2 ± 2 mm). The mean T0-T2 increases were 6.6 ± 2.6 mm (IMD) and 4.3 ± 2.6 mm (ICD). At T0, the cephalometric analysis showed significantly stronger mandibular clockwise rotation (p < 0.01) in the UPXB group compared to the control group. Between T0 and T2, the UPXB group showed a significant reduction of mandibular (p < 0.001; SpP-CoOr T0 = -3.47°± 4.38, T2 = -1.14°± 4.01) and occlusal plane (p < 0.01; SpP-Oc T0 = 11.37°± 3.91, T2 = 9.86°± 3.83) clockwise rotation, and of intermaxillary divergence (p < 0.01; SpP-GoGn T0 = 27.8°± 5.39, T2 = 26.65°± 5.49).
Conclusions: Treatment of UPXB with the FGB appliance effectively increased maxillary transversal width measurements, especially in the posterior region, even after follow-up, indicating stable results. Concurrently, mandibular clockwise rotation was reduced, indicating control of the vertical dimension.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.