利用生物标志物和转化医学促进临床前安全性--推动动物试验替代品验证的经验教训。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Thomas Hartung, Nicholas M P King, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Marcel Leist, Danilo A Tagle
{"title":"利用生物标志物和转化医学促进临床前安全性--推动动物试验替代品验证的经验教训。","authors":"Thomas Hartung, Nicholas M P King, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Marcel Leist, Danilo A Tagle","doi":"10.14573/altex.2410011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the potential of principles established in translational medicine for the use of bio-markers to advance the validation of alternatives to animal testing in preclinical safety assessment. It examines especially how such principles can enhance the predictive power, mechanistic under-standing, and human relevance of new approach methodologies (NAMs). Key concepts from translational medicine, such as fit-for-purpose validation, evidence-based approaches, and inte-grated testing strategies, are already being applied to the development and validation of NAMs. The article discusses challenges in implementing biomarker-based approaches, including standardi-zation, demonstration of relevance, regulatory acceptance, and addressing biological complexity. It also highlights opportunities for advancement through collaborative efforts, technological inno-vations, and regulatory evolution. Case studies demonstrate successful applications of biomarkers in preclinical safety, while future perspectives explore emerging trends like multi-omics integration, microphysiological systems, and artificial intelligence. The article emphasizes the potential of bio-markers and translational science approaches in creating more predictive, efficient, and ethical preclinical safety assessment paradigms in the use of NAMs. Use of biomarkers can enable the mechanistic validation of human-relevant models and provide a means to relate changes in NAMs to animal or clinical study results. By leveraging these tools, the field can work towards reducing reliance on animal testing while improving the accuracy and human relevance of safety predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":"41 4","pages":"545-566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging biomarkers and translational medicine for preclinical safety - Lessons for advancing the validation of alternatives to animal testing.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hartung, Nicholas M P King, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Marcel Leist, Danilo A Tagle\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.2410011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article explores the potential of principles established in translational medicine for the use of bio-markers to advance the validation of alternatives to animal testing in preclinical safety assessment. It examines especially how such principles can enhance the predictive power, mechanistic under-standing, and human relevance of new approach methodologies (NAMs). Key concepts from translational medicine, such as fit-for-purpose validation, evidence-based approaches, and inte-grated testing strategies, are already being applied to the development and validation of NAMs. The article discusses challenges in implementing biomarker-based approaches, including standardi-zation, demonstration of relevance, regulatory acceptance, and addressing biological complexity. It also highlights opportunities for advancement through collaborative efforts, technological inno-vations, and regulatory evolution. Case studies demonstrate successful applications of biomarkers in preclinical safety, while future perspectives explore emerging trends like multi-omics integration, microphysiological systems, and artificial intelligence. The article emphasizes the potential of bio-markers and translational science approaches in creating more predictive, efficient, and ethical preclinical safety assessment paradigms in the use of NAMs. Use of biomarkers can enable the mechanistic validation of human-relevant models and provide a means to relate changes in NAMs to animal or clinical study results. By leveraging these tools, the field can work towards reducing reliance on animal testing while improving the accuracy and human relevance of safety predictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"545-566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2410011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2410011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了转化医学中确立的生物标记物使用原则的潜力,以推动临床前安全性评估中动物试验替代品的验证。文章特别探讨了这些原则如何增强新方法(NAMs)的预测能力、机理理解和人类相关性。转化医学的关键概念,如适合目的的验证、循证方法和综合测试策略,已被应用于新方法的开发和验证。文章讨论了实施基于生物标记物的方法所面临的挑战,包括标准化、相关性证明、监管认可和解决生物复杂性等。文章还强调了通过合作努力、技术创新和监管演变取得进步的机遇。案例研究展示了生物标记物在临床前安全性方面的成功应用,而未来展望则探讨了多组学整合、微生理系统和人工智能等新兴趋势。文章强调了生物标记物和转化科学方法在创建更具预测性、更高效和更符合伦理的临床前安全性评估范例方面的潜力。使用生物标记物可以对人类相关模型进行机理验证,并提供一种将非杀伤性物质的变化与动物或临床研究结果联系起来的方法。通过利用这些工具,该领域可以努力减少对动物试验的依赖,同时提高安全性预测的准确性和人类相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging biomarkers and translational medicine for preclinical safety - Lessons for advancing the validation of alternatives to animal testing.

This article explores the potential of principles established in translational medicine for the use of bio-markers to advance the validation of alternatives to animal testing in preclinical safety assessment. It examines especially how such principles can enhance the predictive power, mechanistic under-standing, and human relevance of new approach methodologies (NAMs). Key concepts from translational medicine, such as fit-for-purpose validation, evidence-based approaches, and inte-grated testing strategies, are already being applied to the development and validation of NAMs. The article discusses challenges in implementing biomarker-based approaches, including standardi-zation, demonstration of relevance, regulatory acceptance, and addressing biological complexity. It also highlights opportunities for advancement through collaborative efforts, technological inno-vations, and regulatory evolution. Case studies demonstrate successful applications of biomarkers in preclinical safety, while future perspectives explore emerging trends like multi-omics integration, microphysiological systems, and artificial intelligence. The article emphasizes the potential of bio-markers and translational science approaches in creating more predictive, efficient, and ethical preclinical safety assessment paradigms in the use of NAMs. Use of biomarkers can enable the mechanistic validation of human-relevant models and provide a means to relate changes in NAMs to animal or clinical study results. By leveraging these tools, the field can work towards reducing reliance on animal testing while improving the accuracy and human relevance of safety predictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信