氟西汀治疗中风后焦虑症的安全性和有效性--前瞻性随机开放盲法终点试验研究(PROBE)。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Satish Barki, Deepti Vibha, Sudhir Pachipala, Kamalesh Tayade, Shubham Misra, Manabesh Nath, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Nand Kumar
{"title":"氟西汀治疗中风后焦虑症的安全性和有效性--前瞻性随机开放盲法终点试验研究(PROBE)。","authors":"Satish Barki, Deepti Vibha, Sudhir Pachipala, Kamalesh Tayade, Shubham Misra, Manabesh Nath, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Nand Kumar","doi":"10.1177/00912174241296233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prevalence of post-stroke anxiety (PSA) is reported to be 20%-25%. There is insufficient evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants for treating anxiety in such patients. This Prospective Randomized Open Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in PSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center pilot study conducted in India, post-stroke patients (between 1 to 6 months) were randomized to fluoxetine (intervention group: 20 mg/day for 12 weeks) or standard medical care (control group). The primary outcome was improvement in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were anxiety remission (>50% improvement in HAM-A), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), quality of life (SF-36), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). A linear regression analysis was done for determinants of HAM-A to account for baseline differences in the intervention and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients were randomized: (30: intervention, 30: control). The overall prevalence of post-stroke anxiety among participants in the study was 50.8%, and 31.5% experienced both anxiety and depression. The average HAM-A score at baseline was 11, and average follow-up score at study conclusion was 4. There was similar improvement in the HAM-A score at 12 weeks post-randomization in the intervention and control groups [fluoxetine: -8.0 (95% CI = -11.0 to -4.0); control: -7.0 (95% CI = -9.5 to -4.0); <i>P</i> = 0.91]. Likewise, there was no significant difference between intervention and control groups at 12 weeks post-randomization on the mRS, BI, SF-36, or HAM-D. There were no serious adverse events in either group during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoxetine and standard medical care had comparable improvement in HAM-A in post-stroke patients with mild anxiety at 12 weeks. Further study of the pharmacological treatment of post-stroke patients with more severe anxiety is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2018/12/016568.</p>","PeriodicalId":50294,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"912174241296233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in post-stroke anxiety-A pilot prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) study.\",\"authors\":\"Satish Barki, Deepti Vibha, Sudhir Pachipala, Kamalesh Tayade, Shubham Misra, Manabesh Nath, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Nand Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00912174241296233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prevalence of post-stroke anxiety (PSA) is reported to be 20%-25%. There is insufficient evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants for treating anxiety in such patients. This Prospective Randomized Open Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in PSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center pilot study conducted in India, post-stroke patients (between 1 to 6 months) were randomized to fluoxetine (intervention group: 20 mg/day for 12 weeks) or standard medical care (control group). The primary outcome was improvement in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were anxiety remission (>50% improvement in HAM-A), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), quality of life (SF-36), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). A linear regression analysis was done for determinants of HAM-A to account for baseline differences in the intervention and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients were randomized: (30: intervention, 30: control). The overall prevalence of post-stroke anxiety among participants in the study was 50.8%, and 31.5% experienced both anxiety and depression. The average HAM-A score at baseline was 11, and average follow-up score at study conclusion was 4. There was similar improvement in the HAM-A score at 12 weeks post-randomization in the intervention and control groups [fluoxetine: -8.0 (95% CI = -11.0 to -4.0); control: -7.0 (95% CI = -9.5 to -4.0); <i>P</i> = 0.91]. Likewise, there was no significant difference between intervention and control groups at 12 weeks post-randomization on the mRS, BI, SF-36, or HAM-D. There were no serious adverse events in either group during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoxetine and standard medical care had comparable improvement in HAM-A in post-stroke patients with mild anxiety at 12 weeks. Further study of the pharmacological treatment of post-stroke patients with more severe anxiety is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2018/12/016568.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"912174241296233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174241296233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174241296233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:据报道,卒中后焦虑症(PSA)的发病率为 20%-25%。有关抗抑郁药治疗此类患者焦虑症疗效的证据不足。这项前瞻性随机开放盲法终点(PROBE)研究旨在评估氟西汀治疗 PSA 的安全性和有效性:在印度进行的这项单中心试点研究中,脑卒中后患者(1 至 6 个月)被随机分配到氟西汀(干预组:20 毫克/天,12 周)或标准医疗护理(对照组)。主要结果是 12 周后汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)的改善情况。次要结果为焦虑缓解(HAM-A改善>50%)、改良Rankin量表(mRS)、Barthel指数(BI)、生活质量(SF-36)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)。对 HAM-A 的决定因素进行了线性回归分析,以考虑干预组和对照组的基线差异:共有 60 名患者被随机分配到干预组和对照组(干预组 30 人,对照组 30 人)。研究参与者中中风后焦虑症的总患病率为 50.8%,31.5% 的患者同时患有焦虑症和抑郁症。干预组和对照组的 HAM-A 评分在随机后 12 周的改善情况相似[氟西汀:-8.0 (95% CI = -11.0 to -4.0);对照组:-7.0 (95% CI = -9.5 to -4.0);P = 0.91]。同样,干预组和对照组在随机后12周的mRS、BI、SF-36或HAM-D方面也没有明显差异。研究期间,干预组和对照组均未发生严重不良事件:结论:12 周后,氟西汀和标准医疗护理对脑卒中后轻度焦虑患者 HAM-A 的改善效果相当。临床试验注册:CTRI/2018/12/016568。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in post-stroke anxiety-A pilot prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) study.

Objective: The prevalence of post-stroke anxiety (PSA) is reported to be 20%-25%. There is insufficient evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants for treating anxiety in such patients. This Prospective Randomized Open Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in PSA.

Methods: In this single-center pilot study conducted in India, post-stroke patients (between 1 to 6 months) were randomized to fluoxetine (intervention group: 20 mg/day for 12 weeks) or standard medical care (control group). The primary outcome was improvement in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were anxiety remission (>50% improvement in HAM-A), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), quality of life (SF-36), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). A linear regression analysis was done for determinants of HAM-A to account for baseline differences in the intervention and control groups.

Results: A total of 60 patients were randomized: (30: intervention, 30: control). The overall prevalence of post-stroke anxiety among participants in the study was 50.8%, and 31.5% experienced both anxiety and depression. The average HAM-A score at baseline was 11, and average follow-up score at study conclusion was 4. There was similar improvement in the HAM-A score at 12 weeks post-randomization in the intervention and control groups [fluoxetine: -8.0 (95% CI = -11.0 to -4.0); control: -7.0 (95% CI = -9.5 to -4.0); P = 0.91]. Likewise, there was no significant difference between intervention and control groups at 12 weeks post-randomization on the mRS, BI, SF-36, or HAM-D. There were no serious adverse events in either group during the study.

Conclusion: Fluoxetine and standard medical care had comparable improvement in HAM-A in post-stroke patients with mild anxiety at 12 weeks. Further study of the pharmacological treatment of post-stroke patients with more severe anxiety is needed.

Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2018/12/016568.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (IJPM) bridges the gap between clinical psychiatry research and primary care clinical research. Providing a forum for addressing: The relevance of psychobiological, psychological, social, familial, religious, and cultural factors in the development and treatment of illness; the relationship of biomarkers to psychiatric symptoms and syndromes in primary care...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信