{"title":"妊娠糖尿病与不良妊娠结局风险的异质性:一项队列研究。","authors":"Yixin Gong, Qunhua Wang, Suyu Chen, Yujie Liu, Chenghua Li, Rong Kang, Jing Wang, Tian Wei, Qin Wang, Xianming Li, Sihui Luo, Jianping Weng, Xueying Zheng, Yu Ding","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Diabetes has increasingly been recognized as a heterogeneous disease, with clinical characteristics and outcomes risk varying across different phenotypes. Evidence on heterogeneity of gestational diabetes (GDM) is yet to be provided.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the insulin physiology and pregnancy outcomes of GDM phenotypes characterized by fasting hyperglycemia or postload hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2050 women who underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were prospectively recruited and followed up until delivery. Women were categorized into normoglycemia (NGT, n = 936), isolated impaired fasting glucose (gestational-IFG, n = 378), and isolated impaired postload glucose tolerance (gestational-IGT, n = 736) groups. Fasting blood sample at mid-pregnancy were collected to measure C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were used to evaluate insulin physiology. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gestational-IFG had greater insulin resistance (HOMA-IR 3.11 vs. 2.25, QUICKI-CP 0.94 vs. 1.03, both P < 0.01), and gestational-IGT had worse β-cell function (C-peptide 2.00 vs. 2.26 ng/ml, P < 0.05) when compared to one another. Gestational-IFG was more strongly associated with excessive gestational weight gain (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.18-2.23) and large-for-gestational-age infants (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.03) than gestational-IGT. The risk for neonatal brain injury was increased in gestational-IGT (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04-4.09), but not in gestational-IFG (P = 0.439). Gestational-IGT showed a stronger association with the risk of preterm birth compared to gestational-IFG (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GDM exhibits distinct insulin physiology profiles. Pregnancy outcome varies between each phenotype. These findings provide evidence on risk stratification and diverse strategies for the treatment of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity of gestational diabetes and risk for adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yixin Gong, Qunhua Wang, Suyu Chen, Yujie Liu, Chenghua Li, Rong Kang, Jing Wang, Tian Wei, Qin Wang, Xianming Li, Sihui Luo, Jianping Weng, Xueying Zheng, Yu Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgae754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Diabetes has increasingly been recognized as a heterogeneous disease, with clinical characteristics and outcomes risk varying across different phenotypes. Evidence on heterogeneity of gestational diabetes (GDM) is yet to be provided.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the insulin physiology and pregnancy outcomes of GDM phenotypes characterized by fasting hyperglycemia or postload hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2050 women who underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were prospectively recruited and followed up until delivery. Women were categorized into normoglycemia (NGT, n = 936), isolated impaired fasting glucose (gestational-IFG, n = 378), and isolated impaired postload glucose tolerance (gestational-IGT, n = 736) groups. Fasting blood sample at mid-pregnancy were collected to measure C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were used to evaluate insulin physiology. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gestational-IFG had greater insulin resistance (HOMA-IR 3.11 vs. 2.25, QUICKI-CP 0.94 vs. 1.03, both P < 0.01), and gestational-IGT had worse β-cell function (C-peptide 2.00 vs. 2.26 ng/ml, P < 0.05) when compared to one another. Gestational-IFG was more strongly associated with excessive gestational weight gain (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.18-2.23) and large-for-gestational-age infants (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.03) than gestational-IGT. The risk for neonatal brain injury was increased in gestational-IGT (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04-4.09), but not in gestational-IFG (P = 0.439). Gestational-IGT showed a stronger association with the risk of preterm birth compared to gestational-IFG (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GDM exhibits distinct insulin physiology profiles. Pregnancy outcome varies between each phenotype. These findings provide evidence on risk stratification and diverse strategies for the treatment of GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae754\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Heterogeneity of gestational diabetes and risk for adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.
Context: Diabetes has increasingly been recognized as a heterogeneous disease, with clinical characteristics and outcomes risk varying across different phenotypes. Evidence on heterogeneity of gestational diabetes (GDM) is yet to be provided.
Objective: To investigate the insulin physiology and pregnancy outcomes of GDM phenotypes characterized by fasting hyperglycemia or postload hyperglycemia.
Methods: A total of 2050 women who underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were prospectively recruited and followed up until delivery. Women were categorized into normoglycemia (NGT, n = 936), isolated impaired fasting glucose (gestational-IFG, n = 378), and isolated impaired postload glucose tolerance (gestational-IGT, n = 736) groups. Fasting blood sample at mid-pregnancy were collected to measure C-peptide and insulin concentrations. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were used to evaluate insulin physiology. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.
Results: Gestational-IFG had greater insulin resistance (HOMA-IR 3.11 vs. 2.25, QUICKI-CP 0.94 vs. 1.03, both P < 0.01), and gestational-IGT had worse β-cell function (C-peptide 2.00 vs. 2.26 ng/ml, P < 0.05) when compared to one another. Gestational-IFG was more strongly associated with excessive gestational weight gain (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.18-2.23) and large-for-gestational-age infants (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.03) than gestational-IGT. The risk for neonatal brain injury was increased in gestational-IGT (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04-4.09), but not in gestational-IFG (P = 0.439). Gestational-IGT showed a stronger association with the risk of preterm birth compared to gestational-IFG (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.36).
Conclusion: GDM exhibits distinct insulin physiology profiles. Pregnancy outcome varies between each phenotype. These findings provide evidence on risk stratification and diverse strategies for the treatment of GDM.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.