Ruben Geevarghese MBBS , Henry Kunin BS , Elena N. Petre MD , Rebecca Deng MPH , Samagra Jain BS , Vlasios S. Sotirchos MD , Ken Zhao MD , Constantinos T. Sofocleous MD, PhD , Stephen B. Solomon MD , Etay Ziv MD, PhD , Erica Alexander MD
{"title":"微波消融肝脏中难治性寡转移非小细胞肺癌","authors":"Ruben Geevarghese MBBS , Henry Kunin BS , Elena N. Petre MD , Rebecca Deng MPH , Samagra Jain BS , Vlasios S. Sotirchos MD , Ken Zhao MD , Constantinos T. Sofocleous MD, PhD , Stephen B. Solomon MD , Etay Ziv MD, PhD , Erica Alexander MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate safety and effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of liver metastases (LMs) secondary to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent MWA of LM from March 2015 to July 2022. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. Postprocedural adverse events were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-three patients with 32 LMs were treated in 27 MWA sessions. The mean dimension of the largest index tumor was 1.96 cm (SD ± 0.75). Technical success was 100%. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 26 (81.3%) of 32 tumors. The median length of follow-up was 37.7 months (interquartile range, 20.5–54.5 months). The median LTPFS was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.87–44.10 months). The median OS was 31.7 months (95% CI, 11.1–65.8 months). Ablation margin was a significant factor for LTPFS, with tumors ablated without a measurable margin being more likely to progress than those with measurable margins (subdistribution hazard ratios [HRs], 0.008–0.024; <em>P</em> < .001). Older age (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.28; <em>P</em> < .001) and presence of synchronous lung metastases (HR, 14.73; 95% CI, 1.86–116.95; <em>P</em> = .011) were significant predictors of OS. Serious adverse events (CTCAE Grade ≥3) within 30 days occurred in 2 (7.4%) of 27 sessions, including pulmonary embolus and severe abdominal pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Percutaneous MWA was a safe treatment for NSCLC LM, with longer survival noted in younger patients and those without synchronous lung tumors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 266-273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microwave Ablation of Refractory Oligometastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Liver\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Geevarghese MBBS , Henry Kunin BS , Elena N. Petre MD , Rebecca Deng MPH , Samagra Jain BS , Vlasios S. Sotirchos MD , Ken Zhao MD , Constantinos T. Sofocleous MD, PhD , Stephen B. Solomon MD , Etay Ziv MD, PhD , Erica Alexander MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate safety and effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of liver metastases (LMs) secondary to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent MWA of LM from March 2015 to July 2022. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. Postprocedural adverse events were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-three patients with 32 LMs were treated in 27 MWA sessions. The mean dimension of the largest index tumor was 1.96 cm (SD ± 0.75). Technical success was 100%. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 26 (81.3%) of 32 tumors. The median length of follow-up was 37.7 months (interquartile range, 20.5–54.5 months). The median LTPFS was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.87–44.10 months). The median OS was 31.7 months (95% CI, 11.1–65.8 months). Ablation margin was a significant factor for LTPFS, with tumors ablated without a measurable margin being more likely to progress than those with measurable margins (subdistribution hazard ratios [HRs], 0.008–0.024; <em>P</em> < .001). Older age (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.28; <em>P</em> < .001) and presence of synchronous lung metastases (HR, 14.73; 95% CI, 1.86–116.95; <em>P</em> = .011) were significant predictors of OS. Serious adverse events (CTCAE Grade ≥3) within 30 days occurred in 2 (7.4%) of 27 sessions, including pulmonary embolus and severe abdominal pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Percutaneous MWA was a safe treatment for NSCLC LM, with longer survival noted in younger patients and those without synchronous lung tumors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 266-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044324006547\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044324006547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microwave Ablation of Refractory Oligometastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Liver
Purpose
To evaluate safety and effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of liver metastases (LMs) secondary to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent MWA of LM from March 2015 to July 2022. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. Postprocedural adverse events were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.
Results
Twenty-three patients with 32 LMs were treated in 27 MWA sessions. The mean dimension of the largest index tumor was 1.96 cm (SD ± 0.75). Technical success was 100%. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 26 (81.3%) of 32 tumors. The median length of follow-up was 37.7 months (interquartile range, 20.5–54.5 months). The median LTPFS was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.87–44.10 months). The median OS was 31.7 months (95% CI, 11.1–65.8 months). Ablation margin was a significant factor for LTPFS, with tumors ablated without a measurable margin being more likely to progress than those with measurable margins (subdistribution hazard ratios [HRs], 0.008–0.024; P < .001). Older age (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.28; P < .001) and presence of synchronous lung metastases (HR, 14.73; 95% CI, 1.86–116.95; P = .011) were significant predictors of OS. Serious adverse events (CTCAE Grade ≥3) within 30 days occurred in 2 (7.4%) of 27 sessions, including pulmonary embolus and severe abdominal pain.
Conclusions
Percutaneous MWA was a safe treatment for NSCLC LM, with longer survival noted in younger patients and those without synchronous lung tumors.
期刊介绍:
JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.