[为重度精神病患者提供的自助服务:谁使用哪种形式?]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel Richter, Johanna Breilmann, Thomas Becker, Andreas Allgöwer, Reinhold Kilian, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Theresa Halms, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Markus Kösters, Uta Gühne
{"title":"[为重度精神病患者提供的自助服务:谁使用哪种形式?]","authors":"Daniel Richter, Johanna Breilmann, Thomas Becker, Andreas Allgöwer, Reinhold Kilian, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Theresa Halms, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Markus Kösters, Uta Gühne","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01749-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-help can play an important supplementary role in the treatment of people with severe mental illness; however, little is known about the utilization of the various approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the use of various self-help options by patients with severe mental illness and examines potential predictors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>As part of the observational cross-sectional study on patients with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS, N = 397), trained staff collected sociodemographic, illness-associated and treatment-associated data between March 2019 and September 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze a possible association with the use of self-help.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants most frequently reported using self-help literature (n = 170; 45.5%) followed by self-help groups (n = 130; 33.2%), electronic mental health applications (n = 56; 15.5%) and self-management approaches (n = 54; 14.8%). Trialogue seminars (n = 36; 9.9%) were the least used by the participants. The utilization of the various approaches is influenced by sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics (age, education, marital status, migration background, age at onset of initial mental health problems, psychosocial functioning level) but not by factors associated with treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The potential of self-help is not being fully utilized in the sample investigated. The reported use of self-help approaches by the participants ranged between 10% and 46%. The various formats address specific target groups. More targeted information must be provided about the various options and the use of self-help in routine treatment must be actively fostered in order to increase the utilization of self-help.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Self-help offers for people with severe mental illness: who uses which format?]\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Richter, Johanna Breilmann, Thomas Becker, Andreas Allgöwer, Reinhold Kilian, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Theresa Halms, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Markus Kösters, Uta Gühne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00115-024-01749-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-help can play an important supplementary role in the treatment of people with severe mental illness; however, little is known about the utilization of the various approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the use of various self-help options by patients with severe mental illness and examines potential predictors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>As part of the observational cross-sectional study on patients with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS, N = 397), trained staff collected sociodemographic, illness-associated and treatment-associated data between March 2019 and September 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze a possible association with the use of self-help.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants most frequently reported using self-help literature (n = 170; 45.5%) followed by self-help groups (n = 130; 33.2%), electronic mental health applications (n = 56; 15.5%) and self-management approaches (n = 54; 14.8%). Trialogue seminars (n = 36; 9.9%) were the least used by the participants. The utilization of the various approaches is influenced by sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics (age, education, marital status, migration background, age at onset of initial mental health problems, psychosocial functioning level) but not by factors associated with treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The potential of self-help is not being fully utilized in the sample investigated. The reported use of self-help approaches by the participants ranged between 10% and 46%. The various formats address specific target groups. More targeted information must be provided about the various options and the use of self-help in routine treatment must be actively fostered in order to increase the utilization of self-help.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01749-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01749-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自助在重性精神病患者的治疗中可以发挥重要的辅助作用;然而,人们对各种方法的使用情况知之甚少:本研究描述了重性精神病患者使用各种自助方法的情况,并探讨了潜在的预测因素:作为重症精神病患者观察性横断面研究(IMPPETUS,N = 397)的一部分,训练有素的工作人员收集了 2019 年 3 月至 2019 年 9 月期间的社会人口学、疾病相关和治疗相关数据。采用二元逻辑回归分析与使用自助可能存在的关联:参与者最常报告使用自助文献(n = 170;45.5%),其次是自助小组(n = 130;33.2%)、电子心理健康应用程序(n = 56;15.5%)和自我管理方法(n = 54;14.8%)。试听研讨会(n = 36;9.9%)是参与者使用最少的方法。各种方法的使用受社会人口学和疾病相关特征(年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况、移民背景、最初出现精神健康问题的年龄、社会心理功能水平)的影响,但不受治疗相关因素的影响:结论:在所调查的样本中,自助的潜力并未得到充分利用。据报告,参与者使用自助方法的比例在 10%到 46%之间。各种形式都针对特定的目标群体。必须提供更多关于各种选择的有针对性的信息,并积极促进在常规治疗中使用自助方法,以提高自助方法的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Self-help offers for people with severe mental illness: who uses which format?]

Background: Self-help can play an important supplementary role in the treatment of people with severe mental illness; however, little is known about the utilization of the various approaches.

Objective: This study describes the use of various self-help options by patients with severe mental illness and examines potential predictors.

Material and methods: As part of the observational cross-sectional study on patients with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS, N = 397), trained staff collected sociodemographic, illness-associated and treatment-associated data between March 2019 and September 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze a possible association with the use of self-help.

Results: The participants most frequently reported using self-help literature (n = 170; 45.5%) followed by self-help groups (n = 130; 33.2%), electronic mental health applications (n = 56; 15.5%) and self-management approaches (n = 54; 14.8%). Trialogue seminars (n = 36; 9.9%) were the least used by the participants. The utilization of the various approaches is influenced by sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics (age, education, marital status, migration background, age at onset of initial mental health problems, psychosocial functioning level) but not by factors associated with treatment.

Conclusion: The potential of self-help is not being fully utilized in the sample investigated. The reported use of self-help approaches by the participants ranged between 10% and 46%. The various formats address specific target groups. More targeted information must be provided about the various options and the use of self-help in routine treatment must be actively fostered in order to increase the utilization of self-help.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信