{"title":"预测 COVID-19 和肺炎患者的临床结果:机器学习方法","authors":"Kaida Cai, Zhengyan Wang, Xiaofang Yang, Wenzhi Fu, Xin Zhao","doi":"10.3390/v16101624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals who progress to a critical stage requiring mechanical ventilation are classified as mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Accurately predicting the discharge outcomes for this specific cohort, especially those with COVID-19, is of paramount clinical importance. Missing data, a common issue in medical research, can significantly impact the validity of analyses. In this work, we address this challenge by employing two missing data imputation techniques: multiple imputation and missForest, to enhance data completeness. Additionally, we utilize the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) penalized logistic regression method to select significant features. Our real data analysis compares the predictive performances of extreme learning machines, random forests, support vector machines, and XGBoost using 10-fold cross-validation. The results consistently show that XGBoost outperforms the other methods in predicting discharge outcomes, making it a reliable tool for clinical decision-making in the treatment of severe pneumonia, including COVID-19 cases. Within this context, the random forest imputation method generally enhances performance, underscoring its effectiveness in managing missing data compared to multiple imputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 and Pneumonia Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Kaida Cai, Zhengyan Wang, Xiaofang Yang, Wenzhi Fu, Xin Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v16101624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals who progress to a critical stage requiring mechanical ventilation are classified as mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Accurately predicting the discharge outcomes for this specific cohort, especially those with COVID-19, is of paramount clinical importance. Missing data, a common issue in medical research, can significantly impact the validity of analyses. In this work, we address this challenge by employing two missing data imputation techniques: multiple imputation and missForest, to enhance data completeness. Additionally, we utilize the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) penalized logistic regression method to select significant features. Our real data analysis compares the predictive performances of extreme learning machines, random forests, support vector machines, and XGBoost using 10-fold cross-validation. The results consistently show that XGBoost outperforms the other methods in predicting discharge outcomes, making it a reliable tool for clinical decision-making in the treatment of severe pneumonia, including COVID-19 cases. Within this context, the random forest imputation method generally enhances performance, underscoring its effectiveness in managing missing data compared to multiple imputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 and Pneumonia Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.
In the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals who progress to a critical stage requiring mechanical ventilation are classified as mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Accurately predicting the discharge outcomes for this specific cohort, especially those with COVID-19, is of paramount clinical importance. Missing data, a common issue in medical research, can significantly impact the validity of analyses. In this work, we address this challenge by employing two missing data imputation techniques: multiple imputation and missForest, to enhance data completeness. Additionally, we utilize the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) penalized logistic regression method to select significant features. Our real data analysis compares the predictive performances of extreme learning machines, random forests, support vector machines, and XGBoost using 10-fold cross-validation. The results consistently show that XGBoost outperforms the other methods in predicting discharge outcomes, making it a reliable tool for clinical decision-making in the treatment of severe pneumonia, including COVID-19 cases. Within this context, the random forest imputation method generally enhances performance, underscoring its effectiveness in managing missing data compared to multiple imputation.
期刊介绍:
Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.