{"title":"评估核型分析和染色体微阵列在产前诊断中的应用。","authors":"Huafeng Li, Yongli Li, Yanli Zhang, Jinping Zhu, Yuqiang Huang","doi":"10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to compare the difference of the chromosomal abnormalities using karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) as well as to evaluate their application in different prenatal diagnosis indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 3007 pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications from Medical Genetics Department of Linyi Women and Children's Health Care Hospital, who underwent standard G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA, were enrolled from 2018-2022. G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA were undergone simultaneously. All fetuses with genetic variants were enrolled for further analyzing. The frequency and differences of chromosomal abnormalities of the two methods were compared in different prenatal diagnosis indications groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMA improved 4.09% (123/3007) of genetic changes compared karyotype analysis. CMA is on par with karyotyping for detection of aneuploidies and gross unbalanced rearrangements. Serological screening and ultrasound abnormalities were the main indications of prenatal diagnosis. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was highest in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) abnormal group. In the ultrasound abnormality group, the detection rate of genetic variants in nuchal translucency (NT) increased group was higher than other subgroups and there was statistically significant difference in the detection rate of pCNVs. CMA can detect 5.57% (40/718) more genetic abnormalities in ultrasound abnormality group on the normal karyotype. CMA improved 0.67% (20/3007) of genetic changes with clinically significant compared karyotype, brought 3.42% (103/3007) of variants with uncertain significance (VOUS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMA identified additional, clinically significant genetic variants on the basis of normal karyotype analysis, brought a proportion of unclear significant variants. All the pregnant women accepted amniocentesis should be informed about their characteristics of karyotype analysis and CMA by genetic counselors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49173,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation the Application of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Huafeng Li, Yongli Li, Yanli Zhang, Jinping Zhu, Yuqiang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to compare the difference of the chromosomal abnormalities using karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) as well as to evaluate their application in different prenatal diagnosis indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 3007 pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications from Medical Genetics Department of Linyi Women and Children's Health Care Hospital, who underwent standard G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA, were enrolled from 2018-2022. G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA were undergone simultaneously. All fetuses with genetic variants were enrolled for further analyzing. The frequency and differences of chromosomal abnormalities of the two methods were compared in different prenatal diagnosis indications groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMA improved 4.09% (123/3007) of genetic changes compared karyotype analysis. CMA is on par with karyotyping for detection of aneuploidies and gross unbalanced rearrangements. Serological screening and ultrasound abnormalities were the main indications of prenatal diagnosis. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was highest in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) abnormal group. In the ultrasound abnormality group, the detection rate of genetic variants in nuchal translucency (NT) increased group was higher than other subgroups and there was statistically significant difference in the detection rate of pCNVs. CMA can detect 5.57% (40/718) more genetic abnormalities in ultrasound abnormality group on the normal karyotype. CMA improved 0.67% (20/3007) of genetic changes with clinically significant compared karyotype, brought 3.42% (103/3007) of variants with uncertain significance (VOUS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMA identified additional, clinically significant genetic variants on the basis of normal karyotype analysis, brought a proportion of unclear significant variants. All the pregnant women accepted amniocentesis should be informed about their characteristics of karyotype analysis and CMA by genetic counselors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation the Application of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis.
Background: We aimed to compare the difference of the chromosomal abnormalities using karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) as well as to evaluate their application in different prenatal diagnosis indications.
Methods: Overall, 3007 pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications from Medical Genetics Department of Linyi Women and Children's Health Care Hospital, who underwent standard G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA, were enrolled from 2018-2022. G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA were undergone simultaneously. All fetuses with genetic variants were enrolled for further analyzing. The frequency and differences of chromosomal abnormalities of the two methods were compared in different prenatal diagnosis indications groups.
Results: CMA improved 4.09% (123/3007) of genetic changes compared karyotype analysis. CMA is on par with karyotyping for detection of aneuploidies and gross unbalanced rearrangements. Serological screening and ultrasound abnormalities were the main indications of prenatal diagnosis. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was highest in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) abnormal group. In the ultrasound abnormality group, the detection rate of genetic variants in nuchal translucency (NT) increased group was higher than other subgroups and there was statistically significant difference in the detection rate of pCNVs. CMA can detect 5.57% (40/718) more genetic abnormalities in ultrasound abnormality group on the normal karyotype. CMA improved 0.67% (20/3007) of genetic changes with clinically significant compared karyotype, brought 3.42% (103/3007) of variants with uncertain significance (VOUS).
Conclusion: CMA identified additional, clinically significant genetic variants on the basis of normal karyotype analysis, brought a proportion of unclear significant variants. All the pregnant women accepted amniocentesis should be informed about their characteristics of karyotype analysis and CMA by genetic counselors.
期刊介绍：
Iranian Journal of Public Health has been continuously published since 1971, as the only Journal in all health domains, with wide distribution (including WHO in Geneva and Cairo) in two languages (English and Persian). From 2001 issue, the Journal is published only in English language. During the last 41 years more than 2000 scientific research papers, results of health activities, surveys and services, have been published in this Journal. To meet the increasing demand of respected researchers, as of January 2012, the Journal is published monthly. I wish this will assist to promote the level of global knowledge. The main topics that the Journal would welcome are: Bioethics, Disaster and Health, Entomology, Epidemiology, Health and Environment, Health Economics, Health Services, Immunology, Medical Genetics, Mental Health, Microbiology, Nutrition and Food Safety, Occupational Health, Oral Health. We would be very delighted to receive your Original papers, Review Articles, Short communications, Case reports and Scientific Letters to the Editor on the above mentioned research areas.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
