特发性支气管扩张症患者支气管动脉栓塞术后复发咯血的独立风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Jibo Sun, Xiang Tong, Dongguang Wang, Lian Wang, Shijie Zhang, Sitong Liu, Xiu Li, Qingqing Jia, Jiehao Chen, Yao Ma, Hong Fan
{"title":"特发性支气管扩张症患者支气管动脉栓塞术后复发咯血的独立风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jibo Sun, Xiang Tong, Dongguang Wang, Lian Wang, Shijie Zhang, Sitong Liu, Xiu Li, Qingqing Jia, Jiehao Chen, Yao Ma, Hong Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12931-024-03019-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is a lack of research on multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) isolation in bronchiectasis-related hemoptysis. The aim of this study to analyze the risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis following bronchial artery embolization (BAE) and compare the recurrent hemoptysis-free rates between MDR-PA, non-MDR-PA, and non-PA isolation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with idiopathic bronchiectasis-related recurrent hemoptysis who underwent BAE at an university-affiliated hospital. Patients were categorized based on PA susceptibility tests into non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were conducted to identify independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis. The Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted to compare recurrent hemoptysis-free rates after BAE for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 432 patients were included. 181 (41.90%) patients experienced recurrent hemoptysis during a median follow-up period of 25 months. MDR-PA isolation (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.120; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.249, 3.597], p = 0.005) was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis. Antibiotic treatment (aHR 0.666; 95% CI [0.476, 0.932], p = 0.018) reduced the risk of recurrent hemoptysis. The cumulative recurrent hemoptysis-free rates for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA were as follows: at 3 months, 88.96%, 88.24%, and 75.86%, respectively; at 1 year, 73.13%, 69.10%, and 51.72%; and at 3 years, 61.91%, 51.69%, and 41.10% (p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDR-PA isolation was an independent risk factor of recurrent hemoptysis post-BAE. Reducing the occurrence of MDR-PA may effectively decrease the recurrence rates of hemoptysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolation is an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization in patients with idiopathic bronchiectasis: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jibo Sun, Xiang Tong, Dongguang Wang, Lian Wang, Shijie Zhang, Sitong Liu, Xiu Li, Qingqing Jia, Jiehao Chen, Yao Ma, Hong Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12931-024-03019-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is a lack of research on multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) isolation in bronchiectasis-related hemoptysis. The aim of this study to analyze the risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis following bronchial artery embolization (BAE) and compare the recurrent hemoptysis-free rates between MDR-PA, non-MDR-PA, and non-PA isolation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with idiopathic bronchiectasis-related recurrent hemoptysis who underwent BAE at an university-affiliated hospital. Patients were categorized based on PA susceptibility tests into non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were conducted to identify independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis. The Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted to compare recurrent hemoptysis-free rates after BAE for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 432 patients were included. 181 (41.90%) patients experienced recurrent hemoptysis during a median follow-up period of 25 months. MDR-PA isolation (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.120; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.249, 3.597], p = 0.005) was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis. Antibiotic treatment (aHR 0.666; 95% CI [0.476, 0.932], p = 0.018) reduced the risk of recurrent hemoptysis. The cumulative recurrent hemoptysis-free rates for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA were as follows: at 3 months, 88.96%, 88.24%, and 75.86%, respectively; at 1 year, 73.13%, 69.10%, and 51.72%; and at 3 years, 61.91%, 51.69%, and 41.10% (p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDR-PA isolation was an independent risk factor of recurrent hemoptysis post-BAE. Reducing the occurrence of MDR-PA may effectively decrease the recurrence rates of hemoptysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03019-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03019-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,缺乏对支气管扩张相关咯血中多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌(MDR-PA)分离的研究。本研究旨在分析支气管动脉栓塞术(BAE)后复发性咯血的风险因素,并比较MDR-PA、非MDR-PA和非PA分离术的无复发性咯血率:一项回顾性研究针对在大学附属医院接受 BAE 的特发性支气管扩张相关复发性咯血患者。根据 PA 药敏试验将患者分为非 PA 组、非 MDR-PA 组和 MDR-PA 组。通过单变量和多变量考克斯回归来确定复发性咯血的独立风险因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较非 PA、非 MDR-PA 和 MDR-PA 患者 BAE 后的无复发性咯血率:结果:共纳入 432 例患者。181例(41.90%)患者在中位 25 个月的随访期间出现复发性咯血。MDR-PA 分离(调整后危险比 (aHR) 2.120; 95% 置信区间 (CI) [1.249, 3.597], p = 0.005)被确定为复发性咯血的独立危险因素。抗生素治疗(aHR 0.666;95% CI [0.476,0.932],p = 0.018)降低了复发性咯血的风险。非 MDR-PA、非 MDR-PA 和 MDR-PA 的累计无复发性咯血率如下:3 个月时,分别为 88.96%、88.24% 和 75.86%;1 年时,分别为 73.13%、69.10% 和 51.72%;3 年时,分别为 61.91%、51.69% 和 41.10%(P = 0.034):结论:MDR-PA 分离是急性呼吸衰竭后复发性咯血的独立风险因素。减少 MDR-PA 的发生可有效降低咯血的复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolation is an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization in patients with idiopathic bronchiectasis: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Currently, there is a lack of research on multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) isolation in bronchiectasis-related hemoptysis. The aim of this study to analyze the risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis following bronchial artery embolization (BAE) and compare the recurrent hemoptysis-free rates between MDR-PA, non-MDR-PA, and non-PA isolation.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with idiopathic bronchiectasis-related recurrent hemoptysis who underwent BAE at an university-affiliated hospital. Patients were categorized based on PA susceptibility tests into non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were conducted to identify independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis. The Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted to compare recurrent hemoptysis-free rates after BAE for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA.

Results: A total of 432 patients were included. 181 (41.90%) patients experienced recurrent hemoptysis during a median follow-up period of 25 months. MDR-PA isolation (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.120; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.249, 3.597], p = 0.005) was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis. Antibiotic treatment (aHR 0.666; 95% CI [0.476, 0.932], p = 0.018) reduced the risk of recurrent hemoptysis. The cumulative recurrent hemoptysis-free rates for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA were as follows: at 3 months, 88.96%, 88.24%, and 75.86%, respectively; at 1 year, 73.13%, 69.10%, and 51.72%; and at 3 years, 61.91%, 51.69%, and 41.10% (p = 0.034).

Conclusion: MDR-PA isolation was an independent risk factor of recurrent hemoptysis post-BAE. Reducing the occurrence of MDR-PA may effectively decrease the recurrence rates of hemoptysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信