COVID-19 后 30 个月肺功能和心肺反应的性别差异:巴西多中心研究

3区 综合性期刊
Cássia da Luz Goulart, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Mauricio Milani, Fernanda Facioli Dos Reis Borges, Juliana Ribeiro Magalhães, Guilherme Dionir Back, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Luciano Fonseca Lemos Oliveira, André Ribeiro de Paula, Carolina Coimbra Marinho, Déborah Pereira Prado, Celso Nascimento de Almeida, Cristiane Maria Carvalho Costa Dias, Vinícius Afonso Gomes, Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt, Leandro Tolfo Franzoni, Ricardo Stein, Mansueto Gomes Neto, Gerson Cipriano Junior, Fernando Almeida-Val
{"title":"COVID-19 后 30 个月肺功能和心肺反应的性别差异:巴西多中心研究","authors":"Cássia da Luz Goulart, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Mauricio Milani, Fernanda Facioli Dos Reis Borges, Juliana Ribeiro Magalhães, Guilherme Dionir Back, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Luciano Fonseca Lemos Oliveira, André Ribeiro de Paula, Carolina Coimbra Marinho, Déborah Pereira Prado, Celso Nascimento de Almeida, Cristiane Maria Carvalho Costa Dias, Vinícius Afonso Gomes, Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt, Leandro Tolfo Franzoni, Ricardo Stein, Mansueto Gomes Neto, Gerson Cipriano Junior, Fernando Almeida-Val","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21101293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: (I) to verify if there are sex differences in respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, and effort limitation in individuals recovered from severe acute COVID-19 30 months after the initial infection, and (II) to evaluate the influence of length of stay on cardiorespiratory capacity among men and women. <b>Methods</b>: Cross-sectional observational multicentric study with participants from five Brazilian states (São Paulo, Amazonas, Minas Gerais, Bahia, and Brasília). We assessed lung function and respiratory muscle strength by maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and cardiorespiratory fitness by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). <b>Results</b>: 86 individuals were stratified by sex (48 women and 38 men). Females had significantly longer hospitalization for acute COVID-19 (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and showed a marked reduction in MIP (cmH<sub>2</sub>O and % predicted). Regarding the CPET, women presented lower V˙O<sub>2</sub>% predicted, O<sub>2</sub> pulse, and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES, % predicted) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, women also had greater abnormal combinations between RER < 1.10, OUES < 80% predicted, VE/VVM < 15% [3 (6.2%)] and V˙O<sub>2</sub>% predicted < 80%, V˙E/V˙CO<sub>2</sub> slope and V˙O<sub>2</sub>/workload < 8.4 mL/min/W [8 (17%)]. The regression analysis showed a significant influence of age, length of hospitalization (< and >10 days), and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC (%) on the V˙O<sub>2</sub> peak (mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>). Secondarily, we found that women hospitalized for more than 10 days had worse O<sub>2</sub> pulse (<i>p</i> = 0.03), OUES % predicted (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and worse V˙O<sub>2</sub>% predicted (<i>p</i> < 0.009). <b>Conclusion</b>: Women exhibited more pronounced impairments in several key indicators of cardiopulmonary function 30 months post-infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-Based Differences in Pulmonary Function and Cardiopulmonary Response 30 Months Post-COVID-19: A Brazilian Multicentric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cássia da Luz Goulart, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Mauricio Milani, Fernanda Facioli Dos Reis Borges, Juliana Ribeiro Magalhães, Guilherme Dionir Back, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Luciano Fonseca Lemos Oliveira, André Ribeiro de Paula, Carolina Coimbra Marinho, Déborah Pereira Prado, Celso Nascimento de Almeida, Cristiane Maria Carvalho Costa Dias, Vinícius Afonso Gomes, Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt, Leandro Tolfo Franzoni, Ricardo Stein, Mansueto Gomes Neto, Gerson Cipriano Junior, Fernando Almeida-Val\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph21101293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: (I) to verify if there are sex differences in respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, and effort limitation in individuals recovered from severe acute COVID-19 30 months after the initial infection, and (II) to evaluate the influence of length of stay on cardiorespiratory capacity among men and women. <b>Methods</b>: Cross-sectional observational multicentric study with participants from five Brazilian states (São Paulo, Amazonas, Minas Gerais, Bahia, and Brasília). We assessed lung function and respiratory muscle strength by maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and cardiorespiratory fitness by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). <b>Results</b>: 86 individuals were stratified by sex (48 women and 38 men). Females had significantly longer hospitalization for acute COVID-19 (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and showed a marked reduction in MIP (cmH<sub>2</sub>O and % predicted). Regarding the CPET, women presented lower V˙O<sub>2</sub>% predicted, O<sub>2</sub> pulse, and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES, % predicted) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, women also had greater abnormal combinations between RER < 1.10, OUES < 80% predicted, VE/VVM < 15% [3 (6.2%)] and V˙O<sub>2</sub>% predicted < 80%, V˙E/V˙CO<sub>2</sub> slope and V˙O<sub>2</sub>/workload < 8.4 mL/min/W [8 (17%)]. The regression analysis showed a significant influence of age, length of hospitalization (< and >10 days), and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC (%) on the V˙O<sub>2</sub> peak (mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>). Secondarily, we found that women hospitalized for more than 10 days had worse O<sub>2</sub> pulse (<i>p</i> = 0.03), OUES % predicted (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and worse V˙O<sub>2</sub>% predicted (<i>p</i> < 0.009). <b>Conclusion</b>: Women exhibited more pronounced impairments in several key indicators of cardiopulmonary function 30 months post-infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21101293\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21101293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(I) 验证重症急性 COVID-19 康复者在初次感染 30 个月后在呼吸功能、呼吸肌力量和用力限制方面是否存在性别差异;(II) 评估住院时间对男性和女性心肺功能的影响。研究方法横断面多中心观察研究,参与者来自巴西五个州(圣保罗、亚马孙、米纳斯吉拉斯、巴伊亚和巴西利亚)。我们通过最大吸气压力(MIP)和最大呼气压力(MEP)评估肺功能和呼吸肌强度,并通过心肺运动测试(CPET)评估心肺功能。结果:按性别对 86 人进行了分层(女性 48 人,男性 38 人)。女性因急性 COVID-19 住院的时间明显更长(p < 0.05),MIP(cmH2O 和预测百分比)也明显下降。在 CPET 方面,女性的预测 V˙O2%、氧气脉搏和摄氧效率斜率(OUES,预测百分比)均较低(P < 0.05)。此外,女性在 RER < 1.10、OUES < 80% 预测值、VE/VVM < 15% [3 (6.2%)]和 V˙O2% 预测值 < 80%、V˙E/V˙CO2 斜率和 V˙O2/ 工作量 < 8.4 mL/min/W [8 (17%)]之间的异常组合也更多。回归分析表明,年龄、住院时间(< 和 >10 天)和 FEV1/FVC (%) 对 V˙O2 峰值(mL-kg-1-min-1)有显著影响。此外,我们还发现,住院超过 10 天的妇女的氧气脉搏(p = 0.03)、OUES 预测百分比(p < 0.001)和 V˙O2预测百分比(p < 0.009)均较差。结论感染后 30 个月,女性在心肺功能的几个关键指标上表现出更明显的损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex-Based Differences in Pulmonary Function and Cardiopulmonary Response 30 Months Post-COVID-19: A Brazilian Multicentric Study.

Aim: (I) to verify if there are sex differences in respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, and effort limitation in individuals recovered from severe acute COVID-19 30 months after the initial infection, and (II) to evaluate the influence of length of stay on cardiorespiratory capacity among men and women. Methods: Cross-sectional observational multicentric study with participants from five Brazilian states (São Paulo, Amazonas, Minas Gerais, Bahia, and Brasília). We assessed lung function and respiratory muscle strength by maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and cardiorespiratory fitness by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Results: 86 individuals were stratified by sex (48 women and 38 men). Females had significantly longer hospitalization for acute COVID-19 (p < 0.05) and showed a marked reduction in MIP (cmH2O and % predicted). Regarding the CPET, women presented lower V˙O2% predicted, O2 pulse, and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES, % predicted) (p < 0.05). In addition, women also had greater abnormal combinations between RER < 1.10, OUES < 80% predicted, VE/VVM < 15% [3 (6.2%)] and V˙O2% predicted < 80%, V˙E/V˙CO2 slope and V˙O2/workload < 8.4 mL/min/W [8 (17%)]. The regression analysis showed a significant influence of age, length of hospitalization (< and >10 days), and FEV1/FVC (%) on the V˙O2 peak (mL·kg-1·min-1). Secondarily, we found that women hospitalized for more than 10 days had worse O2 pulse (p = 0.03), OUES % predicted (p < 0.001), and worse V˙O2% predicted (p < 0.009). Conclusion: Women exhibited more pronounced impairments in several key indicators of cardiopulmonary function 30 months post-infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信